richard is not banned, and the trial is void

Yay

This was luigi's first trial so don't blame him

i dont blame him

Also I still don't even know what evidence IG used cause the stupid link did not work

Wait there is a trial for imgflip?!?

You can certainly object to the trial process or the charges themselves.

However, I’m not sure the stream owner has the authority to overrule a ban imposed by the elected government.

Here we get back into the territory of “is this stream a true democracy, or a monarchy with Potemkin democracy characteristics”?

If there is evidence to support banning a user (and the evidence in this case is overwhelming), the stream owner should not disturb the elected government’s judgment.

sure, but the way the judgment was not handled properly, so it is currently void. I can't stop people if they want to try it again if they do it correctly.

Lol the evidence is them being mad butthurt

There’s your “defense” again, in a nutshell.

The “u mad bro” defense does not appear to fly with this sophisticated government.

about as sophisticated my dogs foot

yall tryna ban someone cuz you don't like his jokes

how tf that sophisticated? also r u still mad when i called u a 30 year old permavirgin

Better than being a 37 year old permavirgin.

wrong

it was only 19.95 😎😎