She's not. Most of what she posts is BS, but she has a point here. The only religious groups that really stress the importance of their beliefs to others are those of Christendom, and that in a far lesser degree than atheist individuals argue about their philosophy. Atheists are leveling out the population at this point- there is no clear majority in America. The number of atheists has been rising since it is a radical, leftist, "woke" idea to believe that things can create themselves, and the universe can define its own rules so clearly- it has been since the beginning of the French Revolution.
What I know about atheism is that it is a game of deduction. And that can be played two ways. Atheism functions as a statement of "you cannot provide to me concrete evidence that directly suggests there is a god, therefore, there is no god". This is evidently a faulty idea that only functions on small scales, and men of belief can retaliate just the same- "You have no concrete evidence to suggest there is no God, therefore, there is a God". Of course, the same is quite applicable, it's simply a statement used to make clear the lack of value in the prior claim. Determination of what is based on what is not rarely functions.
My two cents is a commonly held belief that I am certain you have heard time and time again- how can things be generated in such perfect harmony? Odds are, they really can't.
Caption this Meme
