Please discuss.

1. Not very keen on the “alliance” concept. I think it can get messy and lead to drama. I’m okay with having an external stream for Congress. However, I would disband all militaries and make the government 100% pacifist.

2. “With malice toward none, with charity for all” — see #1.

3. Yes.

4. I would streamline the impeachment process as IncognitoGuy has described, and amend the Constitution to abolish militaries.

5. We need to restore a culture of respect here and tame the culture war stuff. Leave that to the other politics streams. This should be for roleplaying democracy, having fun, and generating ideas for improving Imgflip.

I don't think disbanding the military for IP is a good idea. This is gonna leave us vulnerable

My reasoning is:

1. Militaries should be defensive only.
2. With the stream-ban option, they’re no longer necessary for that purpose. WhiteNat comes back: boom, he’s stream-banned. Any other bans can and should be decided by Congress and the President.

Which I'm trying to resort to. We do not attack unless attacked upon.

1: Maybe
2: peace
3 yes
4 idk yet
5 idk

We kinda have the same things in mind did you see mine

Just did

Okay

I am not running for president but I guess let's awnser some questions
1It depends if we ally with a stream they must have a good back ground and also be able to fight
2 both if we get attacked we will strike back also we won't attack random streams
3 in my opinion no he didn't really deserve to get banned people have done worst maybe a supenshion (I know he did get suspended but mange it could of been longer)
4 I have not read it yet but I will now since I probably will go back on computer (I tried reading it on phone but did not work)
5 VOTING it was to easy this time but me and Luigi are gonna try to change that

1 I'm pretty radical, so idk if people would support me
2 war if necessary, for national protection
3 i don't know who he is
4 i would enshrine the right to unionise, and give said unions power
5 idk

I am not running for Vice President

1. No because we are a government for all of Imgflip and making alliances will damage us in the long run

2.I will only use war when there isn’t any other reasonable way to solve a conflict

3.I don’t want to get into the Richard conflict because I don’t know much about it

4.I will keep it

5.I will make sure that this stream doesn’t split off because with all the controversy’s happing all the time

1. Yes
2. Mainly Peace, but if we get attacked we gotta ask congress to go to war
3. If he was being serious, yes, if he was joking about e v e r y th i ng. Maybe not.
4. Make it bettttttttter
5. Toxicity, and activity for users to do.

1. Tbh, I don’t know.
2. Peace
3. Yes
4. Not really.
5. Idk

-I would consider alliances with streams after thoroughly investigating them to see whether they promote peaceful values and do not harbour any form of dangerous toxicity.

-I would certainly prefer peace and will push for pacifism as much as possible, but if conflict arrives (as it often does here) and diplomacy fails I will not hesitate to take action to defend this community.

-Absolutely. Richard promoted terrorism and didn't appear to express any form of remorse for his actions. He also failed to launch any coherent defence so a trial would have been pointless. His behaviour was completely inappropriate for a Congressman and he deserved both a permanent impeachment and a temporary stream ban.

-I am completely open to any new amendments if demand for one arises, but I am perfectly content with the constitution in its current form for now.

-I believe that the stream owners should have their powers restricted to prevent any possible power abuse. This will help protect the rights of the people.