CO Judge eviscerated lawyers that pushed Trump's election lies during sanction/disbarment hearings

You mean like when he warned the nation that Biden would trash the nation's economy (hyper inflation and no meaningful jobs growth) fling the southern border wide full open, and set fire to the Middle-East again? Those types of . . . 'lies' . . . that just happened to be true?

FGS... so you're telling me that you're completely willing to believe what a decades long known pathological liar tells you - who made over 30,000 documented lies during his administration alone - but are incapable of independent thought such that you cannot discern fact from fiction outside the prism of your own partisan politics. I feel sorry for you. Most people I know learned by the age of 15 that all politicians lie and to never take anything they ever stated at face value.

You just said that politicians -- such as Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, for instance -- lie and to never take anything said at face value and then chastize me for believing anything that Trump ever says? You might want to go back and check yourself for logical consistency unless you LIKED being told more than 78 times the deliberate straight up lie from Barack that "If you like your current health care plan and M.D. then you can keep them, period." Or in other words YOU might apply your own philosophy to yourself and . . . grow the hell up.

Yes, Clinton and Obama lied too as did Bush and every other president I've lived through - all of which were about policies proposed or enacted - but none of them ever did so repeatedly on a daily basis. Trump can't even discuss the most inane topics without making things up or straight out lying about them too. So tell again how I've been inconsistent.

So in order to give them a pass you are now moving the goal posts to exclude these other presidents? So SOME lies are just fine as long as it's about policies proposed or enacted? Maybe that's being . . . inconsistent.

Reading comprehension isn't exactly your strong suit but jumping to erroneous conclusions certainly is. Nowhere did I defend the lies other presidents have made.

Are you a California clown who still thinks Obama's the President ?

This is the 2nd federal judge in two different states within the past 10 days that have held sanction/disbarment hearings against lawyers that promoted Trump's lies about election fraud for self serving social, economic and/or political self interests rather than adhering to truth, honesty or ethics.

Yes, because a group of Democrat judges suspended a license without the person being present to defend themselves is justifiable right?

Why is it that those possessing the least amount of educational and/or professional experience in any given field always seem to be the ones crying foul and/or some type of hidden conspiracy taking place when none actually exists?

As someone who actually possesses multiple post secondary educational credentials and has spent over two decades in the legal profession, there's absolutely nothing untoward that took place with regards to Guiliani's hearings nor his suspension. Nor will there have been any when he is ultimately disbarred, which is pretty much guaranteed at this point due to his prior actions.

You mean like when leftists and Never-Trump RINOs pushed a Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy for two freaking years and then impeached Trump based on what they KNEW AT THE TIME was a disinformation document produced by the Russians FOR Hillary Clinton upon which Barack Obama gave his blessings?

I didn't fall for that narrative either.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanctions-hearing-2020-lawsuit/2021/07/16/90392266-e661-11eb-b722-89ea0dde7771_story.html