Now we’re getting into interesting territory of what we might consider to be the “ethics of memeing.”
I’ve thought about this myself. It seems reasonably clear to me that if a woman is: (1) A celebrity, (2) Posing; (3) In a professional-quality photograph, then it’s reasonably likely that she intended for that photo to be shared. Indeed, I get most of the images I post off of celebrity fan pages. Sometimes the photos come directly from their Instagram or Twitter account, which they or a personal assistant curate themselves.
That said, not every photo I (or other memers) post meets all those criteria. In the boobs stream and other such streams, most of the women aren’t recognizable to me and aren’t already famous.
Do they aim to possibly one day *become* famous actresses or models by taking these photos? Or did they just mean to share them with friends on social media? It’s usually not clear.
It’s also not clear that, even if a woman poses for a photo, that she would necessarily consent to having text written on it or other alterations.
Worth noting that people who are depicted in photographs are the automatic holders of the “copyright” of the photograph. (The person who took the photo also might have a copyright). So, if someone objects to being in a meme on Imgflip, they can presumably contact the site with a copyright infringement request and have it taken down.
Frankly this isn’t limited to women, either. There are ethical issues involved in posting *any* man or woman who “becomes a meme.”
Think about Bad Luck Brian. Why did he become the internet’s face of Bad Luck? Do you think that’s how he wants to be remembered in life? Well, now it’s too late. Everyone’s seen that image.
Most of Imgflip is theoretically built upon a foundation of other people’s images being used in a way they didn’t necessarily agree to. That’s a difficult philosophical problem. If the mods cracked down on every meme that didn’t have the subject’s explicit consent to the alteration, then the website would be 99.99% gone.