Hey, IG. If Omega somehow keeps insisting on a trial, I agree to be your lawyer. How about that so Omega can stop the insisting? Omega will lose in the first few minutes, anyway. It would be just so Omega could stop commenting and we could get this completely over with.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Oh thank goodness. Yes please. The guy just loves to have a reason to start petty squabbles and stubbornly fight on to the bitter end. Let’s give that troublemaker no more reason to bother us. However, I have a feeling that may not be enough because even when envoy ruled against him he stubbornly continued arguing. He’s got issues.
The courtroom will give him taste of his own medicine, they'll insist that they're right, which in this case, they are. If I'm not wrong, the trial starts Saturday at 5 PM EST/EDT, see you there.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
I’ll do my best to arrive on time, but timezone differences can be a bother sometimes. Thanks for the help by the way. That guy is just so exhausting. I’m considering blocking him after this is over because it’s clear he enjoys starting pointless arguments that drag on forever. The only other users I’ve blocked are synthetic-Mantis (who repeatedly replied to me with content I considered to be very anti-Abrahamic despite my requests for him to stop) and a few users who insulted my deceased dog.
If RichardChill24's personal opinions have to be respected and can't be used in attack adds then CSF's personal opinions have to be respected and can't be used in attack adds.
So apparently one of IG's defenses is that since I broke the rules I can't call anyone else out on breaking the rules? Five upvotes to anyone who comments with the problem in that argument.
He's in a higher position than the court... Whatever, we're gonna have a trial and prove IG not guilty. He doesn't deserve any of this, but here we are.
THIS THE MUDSLINGING RULE; THIS IS THE PART OF IT ALLEGEDLY BROKEN; READ OVER IT AGAIN, NOWHERE DOES IT SAY ANY MEME UNRELATED TO THE STREAM IS NOT ALLOWED. THERE HAVE BEEN UNCOUNTABLE AMOUNTS OF IMAGES POSTED TALKING ABT IRL POLITICS, YOU WANT US TO GO CHASE THE POSTERS OF THOSE IMAGES DOWN AND HOLD A TRIAL FOR THEM? THIS TRIAL IS EMBARRASSING AND THE IMAGE IN NO WAY BREAKS THE RULE. OKAY TO ADDRESS THIS POINT, THIS SECTION OF THE RULE IS TALKING ABT USING SCREENSHOTS, OR REFERENCES FROM SEPARATE STREAMS. IG’S IMAGE DOES NOT DO EITHER. WHILE I’LL ADMIT THE IMAGE IS UNRELATED TO THIS STREAM, IT IS NOT FROM ANOTHER STREAM WHICH IS WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE HE’S GUILTY. IN CONCLUSION: INCOGNITO GUY IS WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT INNOCENT
