A thing called “evidence”

The pink courts not allowing evidence, is not lack of proof.

True. Lack of proof is lack of proof. I don't like the idea of being lied to and I've gone down every rabbit hole that anyone has bothered to point me to, and they all have led to nothing.

You have suspicions. You don't have evidence. The burden of proof lies with the accuser because you can't prove a negative. It isn't about a specific accusation; it is about the fact that you can't believe Trump lost. If we disprove one thing, you move on to another accusation.

If there is evidence, it should 100% be looked at. But when Trump lawyers were brought before judges to make their cases, they didn't. Why? Because they had nothing and didn't want to lie to judges.

When dominion sued one of Trumps lawyers that made statements about election fraud, her defense was "nobody reasonable should have believed what I was saying." < I paraphrased

States have gone through full manual recounts and still the fraud claims continue. There is nothing that will satisfy you except a redo or handing the office to Trump. And if we did a redo and he lost, we would just start this whole thing again.

Statistics is science. Biden only out performed Obama in key swing states, not NY, CA, IL. Many running accumulated vote totals went DOWN on election night, which is impossible. Zero coattails. Also, how do you explain pristine mail-in ballots. There are many rabbit holes for you.

Can you give a few more specifics or even a link?
"many running totals went down" where?

I have no knowledge of how a baseline ballot comes through. Maybe pristine is the standard. Also, there were mail drops for some ballots. I imagine a ballot in a stack of ballots might be better protected. But that is just me guessing and not really of any value. Where was this reported?

This isn't how I would expect a group with evidence to act. I would expect them to publish it far and wide and get into the specifics. They should force people to disprove the specific details of the allegation, and if they can't, then you've got them. I would only expect the level of vagueness to be in place if there were no evidence. Its hard to disprove vague allegations.

Why aren't OAN and NewsMax investigating and publishing the claims? Why am I having to go down rabbit holes to find evidence? I will, because I like doing research (I'm so boring), but I shouldn't have to.