This was a rare exception

That's well over 93% of his interactions with black people being completely peaceful. He's a mostly peaceful police officer.

so you agree? except for the killings, a real stand-up guy

At least as good as BLM.

really? that's over 15 million people? have they killed over 30 million people?

I'm sorry you're too retarded to understand an analogy and a joke.

oh ok. i guess your analogy was to deep for me. so how many people have they killed?

Okay, retard, the constant defense of BLM over last year was that the protests were mostly peaceful. That 93% of the protests involved no rioting or violence.

This is almost certainly a lie, but let's take it at face value.

Judged by those standards, Derek Chauvin is a mostly peaceful police officer. Well over 93% of his interactions with black people did them no harm at all.

I'm sorry you're so retarded I have to spell this out for you.

so you're saying they didn't kill anyone?

"so when you consider the damage perperson, "

Oh, so now we can talk about damage per person, hmmm?

Can we talk about the per person violent crime rates of white Americans and black Americans?

Can we talk about the per person rate of black on white murders and the rate of white on black murders?

well i'm not a legal scholar in general, but i think the courts look at these things on a case by case basis. so no matter what white on black or black on white crime demographics might be, i think that Chauvin's case was only tried based on his action, the circumstances of the incident, and the actions of Floyd

but it's a free country so talk about whatever you want

Sure, Cathy Newman, that’s exactly what I’m saying.

so when you consider the damage perperson, including killings, i don't see how BLM is nearly as harmful Chauvin. but listen to this: a lot of people think he got a raw deal.

"i think the courts look at these things on a case by case basis."

Oh, so you're not talking about Chauvin & Floyd as part of a bigger problem. It's just this one, isolated case, and you're not trying to make a larger point at all, right?

i was relying to your comment, you bag of cats, and i referred to the Chauvin case specifically (eye roll). don't you have chores to do or homework or anything at all?

You can't have it both ways, asshole. You can't make this about the broader societal context when talking about the case, and then pretend it's just the one incident and nothing else impinges on it when that broader context becomes inconvenient to you.

The sophistry you creeps display is astounding.