Imgflip Logo Icon

MSM is pure propaganda. Journalistic Integrity does not exist there

MSM is pure propaganda. Journalistic Integrity does not exist there | WHEN YOUR ANONYMOUS SOURCE IS THE SAME SOURCE USED BY EVERY OTHER NEWS AGENCY AND IT’S WRONG AND UNVERIFIABLE AND HAS TO BE RETRACTED; IT IS NOT NEWS, IT IS PROPAGANDA. THE SHEER NUMBERS OF RETRACTED STORIES POINTS TO A LACK OF JOURNALISTIC HONESTY AND INTEGRITY. | image tagged in msm lies,propaganda,sounds like communist propaganda,democratic socialism,democratic party | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
17 Comments
TransitLovingLeftist
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
only one of those do that: CNN.
Bluessol
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
The new yook times has had to retract several stories they published because they were false
TransitLovingLeftist
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
at least they care to retract stuff. CBC, I have never seen retract anything unless they made a mistake. And that's not a lot.
Bluessol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Why do you think they have to retract stories? Because they don’t verify the story and it’s a lie. When all the companies tell the same lie it’s propaganda not news
TransitLovingLeftist
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No. Retracting stories is a normal part of journalism. People make mistakes, we're people. The fact that they own up is good for the industry. Have you ever seen Fox retract? No, because 90% of what they publish is a lie. If they were to retract, they would retract 90% of their stuff.
Bluessol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You’re deluded. They would be forced to retract, but they aren’t because they tell fewer whoppers. Making a mistake is way different than disseminating unverified propaganda. That’s what the MSM do and you’re to caught up in you SJW wokeness to see it. They are fooling you because you are a fool.
TransitLovingLeftist
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
This was found from an OPINION website. You're a wacko. Ever wonder why Fox isn't there? He's a wacko and needs Fox to live.
Bluessol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You are obviously a child, an ignorant one at that. Fox isn’t there because they rarely have to retract their stories and they don’t have the same stories as those listed. Those listed have the same stories and promote completely unverified propaganda as news and eventually have to retract many of them. They wait till the damage is done though.
TransitLovingLeftist
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Fox isn't there because the guy who made the post is a wacko. Stop trying to be logical, you can't.
Bluessol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Who cares who made the post, it’s true. You’re the whacko for begging to be told lies by your “news” source instead of truth. Sometimes the truth is painful, so you fear the truth.
TransitLovingLeftist
0 ups, 3y
"who cares who made this post" I do. It matters, because HE'S NOT A REAL JOURNALIST. Unlike the people in the "propaganda" networks.
Bluessol
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
No the link you posted simply inserts their counter bias.
TransitLovingLeftist
0 ups, 3y
No, it doesn't. They are the number one source, look on their homepage mkay.
Bluessol
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Truth is truth regardless of who tells it. Only fools believe unquestionably what other fools tell them.
TransitLovingLeftist
0 ups, 3y
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/stone-cold-truth/ there's the proof of the stupid source.
TransitLovingLeftist
0 ups, 3y
being fake.
TransitLovingLeftist
0 ups, 3y
And this isn't the truth. The source proves it.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
WHEN YOUR ANONYMOUS SOURCE IS THE SAME SOURCE USED BY EVERY OTHER NEWS AGENCY AND IT’S WRONG AND UNVERIFIABLE AND HAS TO BE RETRACTED; IT IS NOT NEWS, IT IS PROPAGANDA. THE SHEER NUMBERS OF RETRACTED STORIES POINTS TO A LACK OF JOURNALISTIC HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.