Imgflip Logo Icon

Are you as tired of the Democrats double standard as I am?

Are you as tired of the Democrats double standard as I am? | AN ALLEGED GROUP OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS RIOT FOR A FEW HOURS. CALLED FOR PEACEFUL PROTEST. DEMOCRATS PANIC.  ACT LIKE IT WAS WORSE THAN 9/11. IMPEACHED FOR INSURRECTION. CALLS FOR INSURRECTION MULTIPLE TIMES. LEFTS RIOT, LOOT, BURN AND MURDER FOR A YEAR. GETS AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE SHE IS A DEMOCRAT. DEMOCRATS IGNORE IT LIKE THIS IS NORMAL. | image tagged in double standard,democrat,false charges | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,199 views 22 upvotes Made by anonymous 3 years ago in politics
55 Comments
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Amazing. Every word of what you just said is wrong. | image tagged in amazing every word of what you just said is wrong | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You have no idea what it is like from the eyes of a conservative. Because the left has absolutely convinced themselves that a more socialistic life is the norm and everything outside of that is an aberration, they cannot see reality.

Try living in the real world for a change. You guys get away with all sorts of crap all the time. If a conservative did 1/1000th of what a leftist did they would be burned at the stake.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Amazing. Every word of what you just said is wrong. | image tagged in amazing every word of what you just said is wrong | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
a good time to re-use this meme
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
It is? It does nothing more than the last meme. It's just empty words.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
it was a good time to re-use it as you said no facts their.
AND FOR THE LAST F**KING TIME IM NOT A LEFTIST
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Then why are you disagreeing with me?
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Because not everyone is a treasonous alt right shill.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Hey! Mind your own business. :)
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
because you say leftists are socialist. they're not.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
If it smells like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.......
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
it smells like a parrot, walks like a sheep, and sounds like a cultist.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"how"
The ultimate goal of the architects of Obamacare was from the start, single payer government run healthcare. The left wants to nationalize all healthcare.

Obama tried to nationalize the banks and the automobile industry. To a certain extent he did. Controlling interest in GM and Chrysler belongs to the unions and the federal government. Speaking of unions, Dems have always been big on unions. Unions were started in America by the early 20th century Progressives (aka communists).

Unions operate on the Labor Theory of Value. Marx incorporated that theory into his idea of communism even though it had been disproved earlier. The Dems are fully behind this theory also.

The theory is that labor sets the price of goods and services. It is the forerunner to the collective controlling the means of production, which is a socialist and Marxist idea. The collective cannot make decisions so the government does it for them. In this case labor is the collective.

The problem with labor setting the price of good and services is that someone can do a really poor job of building a product but they are paid the same as someone who did an outstanding job because they put the same amount of labor into the products. When those who work hard to make a good product see that they are paid the same is the poor workers they tend to stop putting in the extra effort. Then quality suffers all across labor. This is why the Soviet Union could never produce a car that that anyone wanted.

The Labor Theory also makes the mistake of confusing the value of an individual (which is infinite) with the labor they perform. So if their labor is not up to par then their value to society is diminished. And as in all collectivist systems the individual is expendable.

The Dems aren't there yet but they have already started with cancel culture which is the same thing as devaluing a person in society.

Everytime the Dems gain power one of the 1st things they do is raise taxes. This is because they have no value of private property rights. The government did not earn that money, the individual did. The government has no rights to anyone's money and they never have. Taxation is theft.

The goal of socialism is the complete elimination of private property rights. If you own nothing then you live at the convenience of those who do own your house, your land, your car, your family and your life. You are a slave whose sole purpose is to work to support the oligarchs.
0 ups, 3y
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I'm not talking about you. I was talking about how leftists are exactly like socialists.
0 ups, 3y
how
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Maxine is a FINE AMerican. She has the most "perfect" conversations ever- perfect!
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y
Lol!!!
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Did your parents have any children that lived?? SMH LOL
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Yes, and then the Qanon people sold them to the pizza place and ate them.
1 up, 3y
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Another crazy Leftist!!!

Sad. SMH
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
does your SMH shake because of Parkinson's? Can you whistle Dixie Ken?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I don't have Parkinson's; but do have childhood type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis!!!

Got any "jokes" about those???

Typical behaviour from a disgusting, Leftist tool!!! SMHID
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Hope you are an organ donor. Yes, that type 1 will make sure you wont live into your 50's. From the guy that asked if my parents had any kids that lived
0 ups, 3y
You make fun of people with neurological diseases??

You probably burst out laughing when a St. Jude's Hospital commercial comes on tv. Disgusting prick!!!

And, you're a Leftist, fifth column troll, probably dying of the AIDS his boyfriend pumped up his ass!!!!

You are one disgusting, treasonous, subhuman piece of SHIT!!!
2 ups, 3y
Why do all the people that stormed the Capital claim they were doing it for tRUMP when they got arrested? They all heard the dog whistle.
1 up, 3y
I too, am tired
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Lets be honest. Maxine gets away with her BS simply because she is BLACK!!! Didn't you get the memo?? Blacks can commit any number of crimes, then get paid for it. Laws don't apply to BLACKS!!!
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
That is not entirely true. In order for anyone to be above the law they first have to be on the left. The further left the more they can get away with. As long as the black person in question is a leftist then they can, just like Hillary Clinton, get away with murder.

Black conservatives, on the other hand, are guilty of everything without doing anything and they are guilty until proven innocent. And being proven innocent means to make a complete apology for even thinking like a conservative and committing to falling in line with the leftist group think. The white leftists think they don't exist. To them all blacks are leftists. To black leftists they are "Uncle Tom" or "House n****** ".
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
"That's why many members of Antifa have been arrested over the years?"

Antifa are "useful idiots". They're like Hitler's brown shirts and when Hitler was done with them he killed them. The left has no problem throwing Antifa under the bus.

What I mean (and I should have been more clear) is that you first have to be on the left, in a leadership position and be liked by the powers that control the left. For example, Bernie Sanders can get away with some things but not everything because he is less liked by the powers that control the left. That is why they used the Dominion, Smartmatic and other voter fraud machines to keep him from winning the primaries in 2016 and 2020. The powers wanted Hillary and Biden.

When Hillary lost in 2016 the powers were done with her, which means she can't even jaywalk and get away with it any more.

"Who did Hillary Clinton murder? And I thought you conservatives are all about innocent until proven guilty"

Jeffrey Epstein.

Actually I don't know for sure.

There is a list that floats around on the internet that I have seen several times. It is a body count of people who are associated with the Clinton's since the Arkansas days. You can make what you want out of that list. Some of it sounds just too coincidental while most of the people on the list sounds more like it was just a coincidence.

Anyway is was mostly a joke. There are a lot of conservatives that believe that Hillary kills anyone who gets in her way. Maybe she does. She is not a nice person and she is very corrupt. She had top secret classified documents on her private email server. Lots of them. Anyone else would have had their security clearance revoked and thrown in jail for much less than what she did. Who was she mailing those documents to? The Clinton Foundation made a ton of money raising money to help Haiti. The Haitians haven't seen a dime of any of that money the Clinton Foundation raised. My guess is that they never will.

So if you want to know who Hillary has allegedly killed then do a search on the internet for the Clinton body count. I just know that in my lifetime I do not know anyone who has been murdered. I know people who have died in traffic accidents, from cancer, from heart disease and old age but not murder. The, however, Clinton's know a lot of people who have been murdered. Much more so than the average person. I mostly believe that they are responsible for those murders. Especially Vince Foster.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"So the left is like Hitler now? Also, you didn't disprove my point that numerous members of Antifa have been arrested"

Left is closer to the Nazis than the right is. I am not saying you are Nazi's. Why would I try to disprove you when you were right. Several Antifa members have been arrested.

"Those would be the same "voter fraud machines" that said that Trump won the election in 2016?"

Yes, those would be the same. The problem the Democrats had is that in order to try to make everything look legit they had to win just enough. But they didn't take in to account the electoral college. They also didn't stop the counting in the middle of the night to re-calibrate the machines like the did in 2020. They were not about to make the same mistake twice.

People were complaining in every election since we stared using those machines in 2012 that their votes were being switched from Republican to Democrat.

"And when you consider how many thousands of people the Clintons have in there broader social network, it wouldn't be surprising that they would know some people who died under what some people would say are mysterious circumstances"

I'll bet that Obama, Biden and Trump all know many fewer people who have been murdered than the Clinton's.

"And I'm pretty sure you don't know anywhere near as many people as her to begin with. And a lot of the "murders" haven't actually been confirmed to be murders, people just say they are murderers"

So have you looked at the Clinton body count before? Is this Snopes telling you this or FactCheck? If it is either of them you most likely have been lied to.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"Sure, if you ignore the fact that the Nazis were far-right"

I've told you many times the Nazis were NOT far, near or any other right. They were a very authoritarian government ruled by a megalomaniac. Authoritarian governments are always left wing. And if this isn't clear to you then look at the government that was created by the founding fathers. It was very small and very limited. We had the most freedom we have ever had. That freedom stayed pretty much the same until the early 20th century because our government was severely restricted.

That government was a far-right government. Since the 20th century our government has been growing exponentially in size and in power. We are far less free than we were even 20 years ago and that freedom is slipping away fast. And that is because we are moving left.

There is absolutely NOTHING in common with the right and the Nazis. Nothing at all, not in any way shape or form. The right is for maximum freedom for the individual and minimum government. The Republican leadership talks like that but they don't act like that but the Republican voters are mostly only interested in freedom.

Individual freedom did not exist in Nazi Germany.

The idea that Nazis are on the right is a lie. It does not matter that the lie is taught in schools. If Nazis are on the right and communists are on the left then there is no room for freedom. You just cannot find freedom between two authoritarian government systems especially when, foundationally speaking, the two systems are identical.

I know you don't want them on your side but that is just how it is. If you don't like it then re-evaluate what you think is important. If you think your freedom is more valuable than a government that promises you everything then welcome. If you want a government that is powerful enough to give you everything and also powerful enough to take everything then stay with the dark side of the force.

"Something coming from Snopes doesn't mean it's automatically false"

When it comes to politics Snopes and FactCheck are the LAST places you want to go for accuracy. If you want to find out if an urban legend is true or not then Snopes is pretty accurate. With politics they are 100% a mouthpiece for the Democrat party. I just avoid Snopes altogether.
1 up, 3y,
4 replies
You should just post this this INGSOC 'poster' instead of typing your doublespeak nonsense out.

Hitler is the Messiah of the far/alt right.
Nazis were the Angels who were supposed to usher in their notion of Kingdom of the Gods on Earth.

Your notion about the fledgling USA is also likewise inverted.
The 'Founding Fathers' INVENTED Liberalism, or rather were inadvertantly forced to allow it (first ever, the closest we came was Cyrus the Great, which, as you know, became the first Messiah of the Jews and the only Gentile one because of it. Ironic too, as Hitler referenced his people, the Arani, to conjure the ancient mythology he strived to revisit), namely because they were worried that their fresh-off-the-revolution-fighting new serfs might turn around and eat them for dinner if they crowned Washington king as was suggested.
They couldn't afford crowd control. They even had to come up with the Second Amendment because they couldn't afford to hire and train a profesional army. They couldn't even afford bullets, so getting drafted, as a real volunteer, was a BYO deal.

It was a new thing, this no-Monarchy experiment, as far left as anyone could be at the time short of Anarchy. If I recall correctly, it was the Quackers that were the first Liberals. Yes, those austere, simple, basic, no frills living folks were Progressives in a land of Subjects of the British Crown. I'll skip the details because I've got things to do and you'll just do your usual:
1. Claim ignorance.
2. Look it up after I dare you to.
3. Verify what I say yet proceed to say you are contradicting me and it proves the opposite in Trumptardia.

Big goverment-isms started early on, and while George Washington as President officially was opposed to political parties and Federalism, he was heavily influenced by his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton.
Previously Hamiltan was a leader in the effort to replace the weaker central goverment envisioned by the Articles of Confederation with the stronger one allowed by the Constitution that replaced it.

Later, Jefferson and James Madison's opposition to this lead to the origins of the Democrat party, which favored limited and decentralized goverment.

Authoritarians appeal to those willing to turn control over to a figure who will reign in the chaos they see during periods of cultural, social, and economic flux. That's why Alt Righters go jizzy over Putin, as did those in what they saw as an imploding Russia. Same deal with Trump.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
"The 'Founding Fathers' INVENTED Liberalism"

Not true. The concept was around long before them. The one who is considered the father of liberalism is John Locke.

There is HUGE difference between classical and modern liberalism. I am a classical liberal. Modern liberalism came about in the early 20th century. Progressives appropriated that word to hide the fact that they were all in love with Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini (and that is just a historical fact that you can look up). The early 20th century Progressives looked at this tyrannical dictators as the "men of the future". Author H.G. Wells was part of the Progressive movement, he referred to himself as a "Liberal Fascist".

They wanted to promote the idea that somehow liberty was found in these authoritarian regimes.

There is no freedom on the left.

The left right scale was not the same back in the days of the founders and right up to the Progressive era. It wasn't liberals on the left and conservatives on the right. It was totalitarianism on the left and anarchy on the right.

Then along came the Progressives screwing everything up, like they usually do. When the news came out that Stalin (and the NY Times tried to suppress that news for as long as they could) was a genocidal tyrant the Progressives panicked. Their hero turned out to be a monster. They begin to distance themselves from Stalin.

Then another huge blow was that Hitler turned out to be the same as Stalin. The Progressives still believed in the ideals of Socialism and Communism and kept them on the left but the Nazis and Fascists they blamed that on the right. And that is when and how that scale came to be.

The Progressives completely removed freedom from the scale . Anarchy is no where to be found. The founding fathers don't even have a place on that scale and that is why that scale is so completely idiotic.

Total government control is and always has been on the left and no government at all is on the right. The founding fathers put us just a few steps to the left of anarchy.

So you can keep your INGSOC poster. We who are for small government and maximum freedom for the individual do not need or want your authoritarian rule over us. We can make our own decisions on how to live our lives, thank you very much.

BTW Orwell's 1984 was written about a futuristic communist regime. And where is communism on the scale? BTW another International Socialism and Communism are identical. Just ask your former hero, Stalin
0 ups, 3y
" "The 'Founding Fathers' INVENTED Liberalism"

Not true. The concept was around long before them. The one who is considered the father of liberalism is John Locke."

Looks like you failed to read the rest of that sentence and the second paragraph.
Allow me to facililitate that for you:

"The 'Founding Fathers' INVENTED Liberalism, or rather were inadvertantly forced to allow it (first ever, the closest we came was Cyrus the Great...) namely because they were worried that their fresh-off-the-revolution-fighting new serfs might turn around and eat them for dinner if they crowned Washington king as was suggested.

.....

It was a new thing, this no-Monarchy experiment, as far left as anyone could be at the time short of Anarchy. If I recall correctly, it was the Quackers that were the first Liberals. Yes, those austere, simple, basic, no frills living folks were Progressives in a land of Subjects of the British Crown."

Would "introduced to America" have made more sense to you than my dollop of exaggeration and have you not heard Cyrus the Great predates Locke by a couple of millenia and centuries? Granted, being a monarch, he wasn't exactly what you might call a "Liberal," but credited with the first Bill of Rights and allowing those he liberated from Babylon to return to their lands and worship as they wish, he was something of a radical back when kings demanded to be worshipped as gods.

True to form you:
1. Claimed ignorance.
2. Looked it up after I dare you to.
3. Verified what I say yet proceed to say you are contradicting me and it proves the opposite in Trumptardia.

Since you took a snippet of what I said in order to distort it with your lies, I, as usual, stopped there and didn't read the rest of your revisionist lies.

I understand mischaracterization is part of your Alt Right need to alter everything to suit a bogus narrative spun out of interweb conspiracies and childish fantasies and that's part of a need to want to control, subjugate - as your constant "we" refrain and "leftrightleftright"-isms and "vs" paradigm echo. But that's just the frail psychology of someone who feels he has no control over his own life, his own thoughts, his own identity.
It's kind of sad, really, but somewhat funny too, in a lame pathetic way.
That's why the Trumps, Hitlers, Mussolinis and Stalins appeal to you and fascinate you and your ilk so. They are the ultimate in what you wish to be, but knowing you can't, you latch on to them, hoping you might almost...
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Dude! I'm not "alt-right". I don't even know what the alt-right believes. I know it is fun for people on the left to use the latest "[fill-in-the-adjective]-right" expression as a form of ridicule. But if you are going to call me something then perhaps you should ask what I believe because so far you are batting a big fat zero.

Yeah so I missed your sentence that explain that classical liberalism is older than the founding fathers. So what. How much of what I type do you actually read?

I am not altering history I am explaining it to you. I didn't invent the Progressive movement. They existed and they are the beginnings of the socialist/communist/nazi/fascist movement that is the Democrat Party and everything left of the Democrats.

That wasn't altered to suit me, it is ignored by you to suit you.

"True to form you:
1. Claimed ignorance.
2. Looked it up after I dare you to.
3. Verified what I say yet proceed to say you are contradicting me and it proves the opposite in Trumptardia."

Then you repeated this bit of nonsense that has nothing to do with me.

Is this just a generic list that you post to everyone you disagree with?

Let's pull apart your convoluted No. 3 sentence.

"Verified what I say" - this is what you are saying. - positive
"proceed to say you are contradicting me" - negative - opposite of you.
"and it proves the opposite in Trumptardia" - 2nd negative - the same as you.

The two negatives cancel each other out so that sentence ends up saying:
"What I say...proves...Trumptardia".

So then if you support Trump why would you use the contrived slander, "Trumptardia"?

Yes that is taking "snippets" of that sentence but as you can clearly see I distorted nothing. I laid it out very clearly. Two negatives cancel each other out.

As far as the historical facts that I laid out for you, you are more than welcome to verify those facts. However, you won't find verification in any of your revisionist texts. So you need go to the original sources.

I know the truth can really hurt but just know that it is not your fault that you have been lied to about who the left really are. And if it turns out that you want to live under an authoritarian dictatorship (many people do) there are plenty of countries around the world that will make all of your wildest dreams come true. Of course you'll have to explain why you support Trump.
0 ups, 3y
You don't know what anything means.

Then it's explained to you.

Then you pretend you suddenly know tomes on the subject but invert it because the purpose of trying to boost your frail facsimile of flaggelating ego is not to subject it to adjectives that hurt your precious little feelz.

"Alt Right" is that which you and the rest of your mundane ilk strive so very hard to be and end up just as much a silly caricature of it as it is of itself.
Perhaps you should look the term up and why your type adores autocrats and see them as a fix to your first world non-problems that threaten to render your imperiled existence back unto the nothingness from whence it came?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
"Then you pretend you suddenly know tomes on the subject but invert it because the purpose of trying to boost your frail facsimile of flaggelating ego is not to subject it to adjectives that hurt your precious little feelz."

You read a few comments that I posted and now you think you know me? Just to let you know I have no ego. I've been married over 30 years and the ego was the first thing to go. It's not frail, it's non-existent.

I never said I "know tomes". I've read several books but I am not an expert on anything. What I do know is how the economy works and doesn't work. I never studied economics in college but years later I started thinking about economics. There were a few things that I sort of figured out. Then I started reading and studying people like Milton Friedman, Frederick Von Hayek and Thomas Sowell. I was amazed to find out that what I had figured out with my little brain was correct. And since I have learned so much more from them and others.

Enough to know that Democrats know absolutely nothing about economics. They all engage in magic thinking. The pass bills that increase the national debt by trillions at a time now without the slightest concern about who is going to pay those expenses.

And there you are right there in the midst of all of that lunacy just shouting out names at anyone who actually thinks about horrifying destruction the Dems are doing.

So when we say this spending has to top you call us Nazi's. And somehow you have convinced yourself that you are correct.

"Alt" is an abbreviation for "Alternate" or "Alternative". When used as an adjective to "right" it means something other than the "right wing". It can even mean the exact opposite of the right which would make them leftists.

I don't know who they are or what they believe or even if they actually exist. I think they may have existed for about 5 minutes during the 2016 election but fell apart. The ONLY ones using that adjectives are leftists thinking they are all superior. They use it as a pejorative. And just like when you guys call us racists, it has no foundation in reality. It is just another way to make yourselves feel superior. The problem is that it doesn't really work, does it. You still don't feel superior like you want to be. So you have to keep calling us names and trying to pigeon hole us into some farcical straw man.

You do not know the first thing about me. You know nothing about what conservatives think and why they think it
0 ups, 3y
Good gosh, you alt righties sure are snowflakes.
Funny, always talking about guns and this civil war against who knows what that hasn't happened yet. But point to the logo emblazoned on your tee shirt, and it's sobbing time again.

Perhaps something milder than tee shirt politics would be better suited for you? I hear crocheting is calming.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
You're not right in the head. Buh bye!
2 ups, 3y
Rich people are leftists.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
How is it your "fixer" goes to prison for committing crimes for you, but you don't go to prison?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Leftist fifth columnists infiltrating our court system to insure the treasonous Democrats get the result they need to continue their campaign of ruining our nation!!!

That's how.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Losing elections have consequences- Clumpy lost by a LANDSLIDE, 4 years of Biden, 8 of Harris.. Enjoy!
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Losing an election is one thing. Having an election STOLEN by Leftist fifth columnists is quite another, cupcake!!!

Also, Jo and the Ho are illegitimates. They are only here to bring our nation down for THEIR Communist Chinese masters!!!!

And you support them, making you a treasonous dog!!!! SMHID
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nope, they won by MILLIONS of Outstanding Fine American VOTERS- all fair, ask the Supreme Court, or any court.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You mean the court the fifth columnists are trying to pack with THEIR judges now???

Oh yeah, that's "proof" that the fifth columnists didn't steal and election.

So, so stupid!!! SMHID
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I read where it was said this was the cleanest, most perfect election- in history- surpassing George Washington's win! Mr. Biden won in a LANDSLIDE- did you read that part. 8 million more TRUE Americans did not want the CLOWN back in office- a One term- LOSER
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
LOL!!!

I guess you do know how many votes he had. You lot printed them up so you could steal the election!!!

Disgusting, Leftist!!! SMHID0
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
"You lot printed them up so you could steal the election!!!"
If you are more comfortable using your first language here, go ahead. Your Engresh good today no.
In this country, courts, both local, district and the Supreme Courts require, what we call, proof or evidence. Saying or repeating words that you hear your CULT leader use, isnt proof little guy.
1 up, 3y
"You lot" IS good English. BRITISH English, that is.
0 ups, 3y
The Supreme Court, that your ilk wants to pack with THEIR cronies, refused to even look at the evidence, which, as a citizen, means the court is as illegitimate as "Joe and the Ho's"...ahem..."win"!!!

I don't expect a Leftist fifth columnist, that attacks people with neurological disorders, to accept FACTS!!!

So, just keep being a disgusting, Leftist bigot!!! SMHID
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
AN ALLEGED GROUP OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS RIOT FOR A FEW HOURS. CALLED FOR PEACEFUL PROTEST. DEMOCRATS PANIC. ACT LIKE IT WAS WORSE THAN 9/11. IMPEACHED FOR INSURRECTION. CALLS FOR INSURRECTION MULTIPLE TIMES. LEFTS RIOT, LOOT, BURN AND MURDER FOR A YEAR. GETS AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE SHE IS A DEMOCRAT. DEMOCRATS IGNORE IT LIKE THIS IS NORMAL.