stalin vs. hitler

Hitler was the leader of the National SOCIALIST Workers Party (the German is abbreviated as "Nazi"). The difference between communism and socialism is that under the latter, the government directs production, while in the former the government both owns and directs the means of production.
Nazis in communists fought in the streets for control of Germany over the same pool of potential support - German socialists. Many of the Nazi party's early supporters were formerly communists. They did not defect from left to right, they defected from one form of socialism (International, i.e. Soviet-dominated socialism) to another (German national socialism). Hitler developed the latter to prevent the USSR from making a puppet out of Germany, giving "good Germans" a nationalist alternative to Soviet-dominated communism. Theirs was not a battle between "left" and "right," it was a battle between to peas in a pod, without enough room for them both.

a fight between Germany VS USSR with no other allies? Hitler would have won.

Pffft. The Russians overran the Germans with no help from anyone at all - most of it fueled by Hitler's rookie strategic mistakes. The only way Hitler was ever going to win that war was if everyone just rolled over and let him - which, spoiler alert, is not a valid warfare strategy.

read comment again.. German vs USSR "WITH no allies" Key word. you know 1v1..
Stalin was almost beat. Had Germany not had a war on 2 fronts.. etc etc..

Yeah, I saw. It's not true. Germany were just as close to break point through the whole thing as the Russians were BECAUSE HITLER WAS AN AMATEUR.

more like hitler was insane. but if he had the armies that were on the western front fighting Russia it would have been no contest.

Remember "No allies" which means USSR would have had no resources to make arms etc and germany would have had double the military there..

No, there absolutely was a contest and Hitler lost it. He DIDN'T like listening to academy-trained generals. He DIDN'T like talking about logistical goals. He FREQUENTLY passed up the opportunity to capture cities and strategic locations to instead engage tactically on the battlefield, which allowed the Russians to completely ignore numerical disadvantages because if you have the supply base to fight again next spring then the Nazis were basically winning battles that didn't matter. Hitler did not understand or have patience for campaigning seasons, which allowed the Russians to use winter to devastating advantage - THE GERMANS WERE NEVER EQUIPPED TO GO PAST MOSCOW EVEN IF THEY COULD. MORE TROOPS ON THE EASTERN FRONT WOULD NOT HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE.

Sorry, but Hitler was NEVER going to win that war. He was very much a man who was effective when striking quickly at a world that hadn't yet decided how to respond, but he lacked the training or the patience for the perpetual war that HE HIMSELF WAS GOING FOR.

He was a dumbass. You worship a dumbass.

you are getting upset about a fictional fight and you are as prejudice as he is you pos. You are like him..

You brought it up. I'm fully aware that diplomacy is part of the game so I was never that interested in playing "what if" in the first place.

"You brought it up" actually you replied to my thread and the op brought it up.
Me calling you Prejudice was because you stated that I "worship him" Nope !!!

What are you complaining about now? I called the OP on their bullshit too. I didn't single you out here.

you said I worship hitler, you are wrong as usual

They are both totalitarian. They just got their people to swallow whatever words let them take over.

Stalin was not particularly fascist, nor was he trying to be. Communism's goal was globalist, not hypernational colonial. Remember that? Globalism is left wing? Remember that whole thing?