>Even if it is indeed so, "abnormal words" do not make an argument or statement invalid by default. What counts as normal in one culture is abnormal in another.
I mean use words that others understand. If you had an inside joke, you wouldn't share it with others.
>You are not my maker, nor an elder.
Slurring is offensive and hurtful, and age has nothing to do with authority. You could be the oldest person ever and still be a neo-nazi terrorist
>Definitely true. However, it is very possible for protests to turn violent, thus becoming riots.
this means there is no such thing as a violent protest. A protest can turn into a riot, but everything after that transformation is not considered protesting. You could say it is a riot because a few water bottles were thrown. But if you think about how many people threw them, and how many people didn't, it wouldn't make sense to lable an entire group according to the actions of a few.
>Very true, but why though?
That is yet to be seen. Videos are posted online and on multiple sites where police are beating protesters. These people have no evidence of using violence in offense. Some not even in defense. But when the officer notices the cameraman, they hit them with any object they can find even after the cameraman repeatedly shouts "I'M PRESS! I'M PRESS!" I know multiple people have seen the rubber bullets used against press, both on camera and in person, but i don't need to watch it to belive it, as it is very gory and there are testimonials.