Black Lives Matter!

Regardless, the fact that they even drew guns on a six year old only pushes the message behind BLM even further - Police Reform *is* long overdue.

a six yr old girl was arrested for being black?

imma need sources for that one

Didn't say that. You twisted what this meme said to fit that assertion. Google this, the news about it is everywhere from multiple sources.

I didn't twist anything, it's implicit in your post

yes

Implicit would mean that this was my intentional inference. You're seeing what you want to see because of your racist bias.

that's why I said that you had "implied" it in your post ...because you "implied" it in your post. I didn't have to "infer" it, it was right there in your post, "implicitly"

Implying is a strawman argument. I never said that or made such intentional implications. This is called implicit bias: you're picking up what you want to hear.

"implication" is NOT a "straw man" argument. I never said you implied it intentionally, i just pointed out that you implied it in your post ...because you did

"implicit bias" nope, just "implicit"

I did no such thing. I know what I was stating and that wasn't it. You can't re-write what I wrote, sorry.

you implied that a six year old black girl was arrested because she was black ...get over yourself already!!

"is that "mostly false" as in "mostly peaceful" ...so, the truth?!"

Not everything is binary. The fact that some of the right wing needs to have everything binary speaks volumes for their mental deficiencies.

While in this meme, Obi-wan is a hypocrite for using an absolution statement calling the sith out for using absolutions, I have not dealt in absolutions here. You have. Simp.

who on earth am I simping for here?????

Noun
simp (plural simps)

(slang) A simple person lacking common sense; a fool or simpleton.

Nice crowd-sourced dictionary, though. Let me know when you wanna be taken seriously xD

I am British tho' and I can assure you , nobody in britain says "simp" ...well, apart from the internet-literate, for internet reasons

Really? I play Eve-Online with a bunch of british people and they use the word liberally [freely.] It stands to reason if they use it on the internet, why wouldn't they use it IRL? I use it IRL. Maybe you're the exception to the rule.

So, if you're British, what're you doing being hyperfocused on American politics? You don't see me running around talking about what's-his-face ... Boris? Yeah, Boris or Brexit. That's your guys' affairs.

I mean, if we're being honest, you're asking me this question:

"when was the last time you saw a 5yr old black child being executed in the street by a white man and then have the msm sweep it under the rug?"

Looking over your submissions, I think I only saw one or two British/EU memes. The rest were about Biden/Trump.

no, if you're being really honest, all we're doing here is dancing around your deflections of me pointing out that your meme implied a 5 yr old black girl was arrested *because* she was black

I focus on American politics because what happens in America will generally happen here at a later date.

I didn't see *you* chipping in on Brexit but I did see president Obama and now president Biden chip in with threats against us, if we left the EU

Simp, as it's used now on the internet, means exactly what I described it as. No-one, literally no-one ever called anybody a Simp (as you defined it) irl in the UK ...simpleton, yes, simp no

Are we really dancing around my deflections? Or are we dancing around your projections because you were clinging to the urban dictionary like a moth to fire because it had the definition you wanted? Then, you tried to use Webster's claiming it had the definition you were talking about, failing to address the part where it directed you to another definition for reference. Which, also included my definition that I am referencing.

Having viewed the history of the word "simp." I see where you're coming from. It points heavily to rap music mentioned in the 80s when the word was, as you said, relating to the submissive nature men can have to women. But, also in the text, it does mention my definition as well. However, in the context in which I used the word, the intended definition was one who is simple. Neither of us are wrong in this case. But, since I used the word in my language and knew the intent, explained the definition, am the owner of the words spoken, I am right as I chose what word to use with what definition. So, you could choose to take the wrong definition, but that'd just make you an idiot with a bad comeback, by attempting to deliberately ignore the intended meaning.

Much like cancel culture. There's the definition that you recognize, but I am highlighting another version of cancel culture as well that the right-wing doesn't want to take credit for because they literally can't stand the notion of their own hypocrisy. It causes cognitive dissonance. Here's the link to the word history of Simp, by the way.

https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/simp/#:~:text=The%20internet%20teen%20slang%20simp,too%20subservient%20to%20a%20woman.

As for my meme? Companies and organizations are included in cancel culture. But even so, so what?

Kaepernick was cancelled by right wing for taking a knee during the national anthem. He's a person, not a company. Same for every senator and representative who voted against Trump. They're actually using government means to censor their representatives and senators while accusing democrats of just that because twitter, an entity separate from the US government, decided to block Trump. As well as Amazon for shutting down Parler, which is the platform that was largely used to coordinate the January 6th capitol riot.

Nothing but hypocrisy as far as the eye can see.

I do use imgflip for British memes, but I tend not to post here due to the lack of people who know anything about what's going on in the UK

exactly where are the sources? the evidence that this incident was race motivated? oh wait there is none!

Do you need a "let me google that for you" link?

Well, I know of a black 4 year old girl in Atlanta just sitting in her car BLM activists gunned down in cold blood.

But the crazy left likes to ignore things that don’t fit their narrative.

I remember, wasn't that in the same week George Kirby died of a fentanyl overdose?

#Sblm

#Some...

Fake news, he didn't die of overdose. Check your sources

but the criminal lawyer who wants to get rich and famous from this case says he was murdered ...and he wouldn't lie, would he?!

#GetaBrain

See comment below. I advise you to take your own advice :)

no, that one is true

Suffocation was not the CoD. But it was a heavy factor that brought the CoD (cardiac arrest.) If he died of suffocation, he would've died on the street.

he did tho'

I don't know what experience you have of working with drug addicts, i have a fair bit. When people take these drugs they know that they must keep their airwaves open, he would've died in any position except for the one where he would be sat down with his head hanging backward

Fake news:

The notion that Floyd died "because* of fentanyl.

Mostly false.

The HCME did list drug use as being a factor that could have contributed to the death of George Floyd. But it reported that neck compression and cardiopulmonary arrest played a larger role in his death.

The HCME and family-ordered autopsies ruled homicide as the cause of death.

Neither report claims that Floyd died of drugs or a pre-existing condition, but instead that his heart stopped and that the cause of death was restraint.

is that "mostly false" as in "mostly peaceful" ...so, the truth?!

he died of covid, so suck it up

Do you even check your sources?

Just because you have a low IQ doesn't mean that when you die, that's what killed you, Magus.

Just means you have a low IQ. Like Floyd had tested positive for COVID. Or, if you die in a planecrash. Odds are you didn't die of HIV if you had it. The crash killed you.

Your attempt at fake news is laughably pathetic.

Given the diagnosis, it actually adds more credibility that the police officer killed him by cardiac arrest complicated by prolonged asphyxiation, if he had COVID. Too bad the officer didn't get it. But, when you can't breathe, I guess you can't spread the virus... so.

it was a joke ya retard

Sorry, your idiocy was so convincing I took you seriously. My bad. It was consistent with everything else I've been getting from you.

Black people getting arrested isn't freaking racist

When's the last time you saw a white child held down the pavement at gunpoint for an allegedly stolen vehicle while someone on scene was trying to provide vehicle registration but the police wouldn't look at the evidence...?

when was the last time you saw a 5yr old black child being executed in the street by a white man and then have the msm sweep it under the rug?

no you need to stop black people killing white people indiscriminately

That's not an excuse for police brutality; that's racism by mass generalization.

would you rather be an armed cop confronting an unarmed black guy, or vice versa?

an armed cop is FOUR times more likely to be "SHOT" TO DEATH by an UNARMED black guy, than an unarmed black guy is to be killed by a cop of any color

funny what those stats say when you can actually read them, huh!?

Also, of the ten or eleven unarmed black guys who were killed by cops in 2020 ...do you know how many of the "white supremacist/institutionally racist" cops were actually white?? hmmmmmm?!?

you're still justifying use of excessive force on the black community. The argument you make suggests that because police are four times more likely to get shot by "unarmed black men" that the use of excessive force is justified. That's racism. Assuming a stereotype by color *then acting on it to stop it from starting.* When instead, you can take preventative measures.

I mean, I can see how your argument makes sense when police shoot unarmed black men in the back or unarmed black men who are trying ro run away. Kinda makes your stats fallible, doesn't it?

Where did I "justify" the use of excessive force on anyone? kneeling on someone's neck is not "excessive force" ...to the best of my recollection these were IDF tactics which Obama bough in for the US police forces. It wasn't racist...it wasn't even troublesome... when Tony Timpa was the victim. Are you familiar with that case?

No, my argument doesn't suggest that at all ...you're inferring it, that's all. My argument was quite simply, people like you call the deaths of unarmed black men "statistically disproportionate" but you neglect to look at other stats, such as the one i highlighted ...or the fact that 50% of all murders in the US are committed by 7% of the population

my stats are only fallible if you do what you just did ....and simply make stuff up

I wrote: That's not an excuse for police brutality; that's racism by mass generalization.
You wrote: would you rather be an armed cop confronting an unarmed black guy, or vice versa?

Thereby, you're justifying it; making excuses for police brutality.

99% of statistics on the internet are made up. You're also being ambiguous as to what the 7% represents of the population as a whole. You're trying to lace your arguments with enough "truth" (which is not the same as fact) to make you seem credible, which you aren't. Not here. Not ever :D Good talk though. You're not going to get anywhere with me. So who are you trying to convince, me? Or yourself?

I'm making excuses for "police brutality" by pointing out that armed cops are FOUR TIMES more likely to be SHOT by unarmed black guys, than unarmed black guys are to be killed by a cop of any skin color...?! really??

my stats come straight from the .gov website

7% of the population is black males ...the ones who commit 50% of ALL murders

"7% of the population is black males ...the ones who commit 50% of ALL murders"
That still doesn't justify needless and excessive police brutality. It never does.

I never said that the FACT that 7% of the population routinely murders 50% of the population was justification for anything. especially when you consider that that same demographic is responsible for 94% of ALL murders involving black victims

I'm simply pointing out that the stats tell a different story ...when you don't cherry-pick them

Right, so by your logic, looking at

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls

White police really have nothing to worry about. Yet, they are the ones comitting the most police brutality.... Hmm...

#getabrain #stopcherrypicking

LOL

ooooh stats ...my favourite. I will definitely check these out over the next few days

in the meantime, I wonder if you could answer this point which for some unknown reason, I NEVER hear anyone talking about ....

of the 10 or 11 deaths of unarmed black men at the hands of the police every year ...how many of those cops were white?

This is not a trick question, I genuinely don't know but I've always been curious (not curious enough to do the research on it!) but curious to know why no-one ever looked at those numbers. I mean, If all 10 or 11 were killed by white officers, then I guess there might be something to look at there, right!?

I don't know if it can be accurately recounted right now, as police reporting on shootings is actually voluntary (at least this was so in 2018). Many aren't reported, the ones we hear about are only those that are shared across social and mass media.

I'm questioning this video (below) as the first name is a member of the columbine shooting duo. So, some confusion there, maybe identical names. But, you can go through the list and look at each name that it plays, google the name and see the data for yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwHGtgOs0cQ

that looks a lot like you're backtracking on your "stats" post

Nope, I'm highlighting a different statistic. Sorry for the confusion.