Nazis love “free speech” when they’re in the minority, but as soon as they’re in power, say bye-bye to liberal thought.

But don't take it from me: Take it from our resident self-appointed experts in Neo-Nazism themselves

I am bothered by the fact that he says that jews wrote books that declared Whites were money hungry pigs, etc, etc.. Because that's what the Nazi's wrote about.

https://www.strawpoll.me/42510223

"Both sides!" Not really.

The difference being that the tradition of liberal thought from the Greek philosophers through the advent of the scientific method, the Enlightenment, and today is fundamentally decent and compassionate, and is truthful or at least aims to seek the truth in good-faith.

While Nazism is inherently bigoted and violent, hostile to truth and seeks to destroy not build.

But other than that: yep! Same thing!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust

Your favorite Fuhrer slaughtered 6 million Jews, many more millions dead overall in Europe due to WWII which at every junction was war of choice launched by the whims of Hitler himself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

The entire WWII conflict killed 70-85 million people around the world, the deadliest war ever. Many of those perpetrated by Hitler's close allies, the Japanese Empire who launched their own wars of choice against Korea, China, the U.S., etc.

Yes, that's a destructive legacy, and your inability to recognize that is hostile to the truth of the historical record.

Now cue your attack on Wikipedia, another emblem of your hostility to reason.

Wikipedia is a more valid source than anything you'll find on Bitchute -- its major articles (such as this one) undergo lots of revision and frequent updates and are the product of immense amounts of human intelligence and scholarship, while being easy to find and readable by a general audience.

I decline your invitation to stop citing it because of your hurt feelz.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

More to the point, the sources WIkipedia cites are valid sources. Here is just the first page of sources cited by the linked article -- 254 sources in total. I could post many more pages of its sources but you get the drift.

You're not listening to me? I'm hurt!

You may be surprised to learn I'm not listening to you either -- I'm only citing information for the benefit of those following along and, one hopes, the mods, who may eventually decide that they do not want the platform they've built for purposes of fun and creativity to be used to spread Holocaust denial and take any actions they deem appropriate.

that list is BS for reasons I already stated in that thread; we don't have to re-hash them again.

"I haven't broken any terms!"

That's what you said last time, brother, shortly before your other account was nuked.

The reality is Imgflip can delete you for any reason or no reason at all. It's their house, their rules. The TOS serves as a guideline for the community, but is not binding on them in any sense.

Certainly the number of racist memes you've posted, your Holocaust denial, openly and proudly carrying yourself around as a Neo-Nazi all added together are as good a reason as any to yeetus deletus.

bruh, do you honestly think people will vote for you?

The Holocaust happened. Look it up in any respectable vetted historical source and stop smoking Bitchute conspiracist crap.

The sources listed at the bottom of the Wiki article I linked above and here will point you in the direction of some real history.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

Wikipedia's co-founder (no longer affiliated with Wikipedia) evidently has a massive conservative bias himself: as such there's little reason to afford his own complaints about bias much attention.

But I doubt even Mr. Disaffected ex-Wikipedian is insane enough to deny the Holocaust.