Day one for the Biden Idiot and the Idiots who voted for him!

Day one for the Biden Idiot! Jobs eliminated because the Keystone Pipeline stopped! Gas Prices Going Up! Large Caravan Coming to the USA to replenish voters who will become wise to the stupidity of Democrats! Going back on the Paris Climate Accord where India and China do not have the same standards as the USA! Good job idiots who voted for Biden. I thought Biden was an idiot but the voters that voted for him are the bigger ones! LOL

It's 1000 jobs, not 10,000. https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2021/01/22/keystone-pipeline-jobs-lost-joe-biden-executive-order-cancel-fact-check/6673822002/

Fake news

Wow, first time he actually does something for the 50ish years he's been in politics... and he messes America up.

And if he try's extra hard, he will get America into Civil War

yeah screw the environment

renewable energy provides more jobs anyways

thats... exactly what y'all do too

That is why idiots vote Biden they have no knowledge of reality. Solar and wind do not provide power 24/7 or Peak power when it is needed most. Just parrot stupidity they read and have 0 real knowledge. Pathetic! I a not sure what I believe Liberals are anymore, Stupid, Pathetic, communists, brainwashed, so sad LOL. It so sad not funny anymore that half our nation can be this way!! LOL

If they were truly serious about carbon-free energy, they'd stop opposing nuclear power, and they'd stop advocating for the destruction of hydropower plants. They are the only source of carbon-free energy that runs 24-7, 365 days a year. There are a whole slew of new generation designs for nuclear plants that are incapable of a meltdown. They even have a design that can run on the waste of old generation plants, reducing it's radioactivity radically.

he never said you were communists so don't get started

Okay didn't see that

Mark my words, "Oil and Gas are not going anywhere anytime soon" not anywhere in the world.
They will probably will still be in widespread use through our lifetimes and even until the end of the century and beyond.
Let me give you an example of why renewables will not meet our needs, Electric cars using batteries charged from traditional or renewable means are just not viable for every one to own and they create a whole other world of pollution when they become scrap which no one knows what to do with it (search for Chinese electric bike dumps to see this problem just from bikes).
Not to mention that if they catch fire they were already a hazardous waste and cannot be put out by regular fire fighting methods.If you see an electric car that has caught fire, all that they can mostly do is watch the thing burn and keep people awasy from the toxic fumes which emenate. They just have to leave it to burn out spewing the toxic plume into the environment you so wish to protect.
The people who run the world financially have decided to push electric cars for the time being even though running cars on hydrogen would make so much more sense as you would only produce water vapour out the exhaust.
You wouldn't need rare earths and poisionous elements to make an internal combustion engine that ran on hydrogen. Then comes a more pertinent fact and that is, if the hydrogen was coming from a stored capacity or was possible to make on demand it would have no range issues. You would just fill up like we do with gas in cars.
Personally I doubt the oil companies with their infrastructure in place for gas would like it much if we could produce hydrogen on demand so it would probably be pushed for the system to be storage based with the research into personal generation from water ignored.
Whatever way things go and whichever sytems they choose to adopt or ignore we will still need Oil and Gas for so many things we currently take for granted right down to producing fertilizers for food production. The picture is much bigger than just saying we are gonna use renewables. Renewables will not meet our present needs let alone the future needs of the world.

There's only two issues I can see with Hydrogen- First, when you combust Hydrogen in a conventional engine, any Aluminum parts exposed to the Hydrogen undergo "Embrittlement", which causes them to erode (this is easily addressed by injecting a small amount of water with Hydrogen, though). Secondly, the energy required to split water into Hydrogen and Oxygen is more than you will get out of combusting it back into water. You can get more Hydrogen from Natural Gas (i.e: beyond the break-even point), but it will also create CO2- which will make the Environmentalists cry. I do think some of the new electric cars are quite remarkable, but you are correct: the batteries essentially come from China owned and run open pit strip mines in Africa.

Yeah it's so complex that when they say we must do this but not that I always have to relate to who is running the show. That is to say that the interests of certain parties who have invested in some area or the other are always pushing their own product and deriding another. From the nuclear you mentioned before/above to methods of making coking coal from poorer grades which in turn produce less harmful outputs. If they don't fit into the agendas of those owning other competing technologies they supress or defund any movement on the technology.
Realistically everybody can do themselves what is required to protect the environments in the first world countries wthout relying on some government mandate, law or tax to enable benefit of the next generation.
Did you ever see the beach buggy that ran on water, Stran Meyer I think was the guys name?

Sorry for the late response- got busy. Yes, I remember reading about Stan Meyer: he was a VERY prolific inventor (the patent office fast-tracked all his applications because he submitted so many, so often). The problem with his car is the fact that for it to do what he claimed, it would violate the first two laws of thermodynamics (1-you cannot create or destroy energy, only convert it, and 2- Entropy {lack of energy} will always build up in a closed system). He clearly built an operating car with a drivetrain that utilized an Electrolysis unit. I would like to know how far the car could travel reliably, because I suspect that if the car was in fact running off of Hydrogen that was being split out of water at that moment, most likely the battery was being heavily drained to run the Electrolysis unit. The engine's alternator would continue to try to re-charge the battery, but would not be able to keep up- the battery would eventually run down. Now maybe, with a modern battery scavenged from a plug-in hybrid, someone could get enough range out of this set-up to make it worthwhile (i.e: charge the battery, fill the water tank, and drive), but I have my doubts that it would be as efficient as just having more batteries and an electric motor. Also, I have read about people claiming to be using these Electrolysis units in their cars to inject Hydrogen into the air intake of their gas cars, supposedly radically increasing their fuel mileage. I have no idea how safe this idea is: I wouldn't try it with any car I cared about, that's for sure. I have also read about people adding various chemicals to the water to increase the amount of Hydrogen released, supposedly past the "Break Even" point. The questions I have regarding the use of chemical solutions are 1-What's the by-product and what will you have to do to get rid of it, and 2- what will any by-products do to the Electrolysis unit. Stan was a very smart, self-educated, and well regarded individual (he was involved in the Reagan Era "Star Wars" defense program) regardless of what people think about his car. Sorry for the extreme length of the response, but it's not a simple subject by any means.