Liberal logic

Hillbilly? Is that who you think they are? Just a bunch of hillbillies?

I'm anti rioting regardless of who is doing it.
I saw a bunch of real partiots at the protest and a surprising number of antifa thugs in disguise. But a lot of the people actually breaching the capital building are having way to good of a time. If they were having a good time rioting, I wanna go out on a limb and assume they aren't the smartest people or actual political activists.
There's plenty of people who just wanna watch the world burn. So yeah, imma call em dumb hillbillies.

the line "fiery but mostly peaceful protests" was made by the news to anger the people they wanted clicks from

Well the media and left wing politicians had 6 months to condemn the communist rioting & didn't bother. Our next president Kamala is on record as supporting the Antifa thugs.
It took Trump and his crew an hour to condemn the violence. So I'm officially ignoring any left wing complaining about the capital rioting.
It was still absolutely wrong and if I was running the show I'd have sent in the Marines to clean house, but that's another topic.
So since they didn't retract 'fiery but mostly peaceful' in an hour it'll haunt them for all time.

"Well the media and left wing politicians had 6 months to condemn the communist rioting & didn't bother"

you can tell that to the curfews that happened literally the same week when the first protests happened

"It took Trump and his crew an hour to condemn the violence"
still implying that he was completely fine with it happening

"So I'm officially ignoring any left wing complaining about the capital rioting."

because you can't debate for a dime

"So since they didn't retract 'fiery but mostly peaceful' in an hour it'll haunt them for all time"

at least it has your attention and anger, along with hatred towards a """"""communist rioting"""""" because of what was displayed on a TV camera

Curfews aren't public condominium and you know that. Our next president [ms Kamala] is one the record supporting BLM, Antifa & the commie thugs burning down the country. You know that's not remotely similar to condominium.
Don't try to defend 6 months of rioting, looting and burning. Don't try to debate it cause the left just spent 6 months cumming their pants for every stone thrown and every building lit on fire. The right has never wavered in condominium of riots. So don't even start cause you'll lose.

"Curfews aren't public condominium and you know that"

ok..? we weren't arguing about condominium. you told me that no democratic politician had condemned the rioting, even though curfews were put in place after the fact.

"Our next president [ms Kamala] is one the record supporting BLM, Antifa & the commie thugs burning down the country. You know that's not remotely similar to condominium."

you know that one isolated politician doesn't decry the curfews.

"Don't try to defend 6 months of rioting, looting and burning"

i'm not defending it lol. i even donated to someone who had suffered from the damage.

i'm saying that the majority of the 6 months wasn't that. the media just pointed the cameras at it to make people angry and make money off of the views.

"Don't try to debate it cause the left just spent 6 months cumming their pants for every stone thrown and every building lit on fire"

maybe i should use the word "cumming" to describe a conservative's feelings towards trump every time he does another drone strike.

"So don't even start cause you'll lose."

good thing i wasn't defending it. just pointing out the zeal towards being outraged by a phrase CNN used to trigg' people and rile them up.

You're talking about curfews & the US military popping terrorists with drones? What the heck does that have to do with anything?
I'm sorry for wasting your time. I thought we were discussing my meme. Apparently you wanna have your own unrelated argument. Have a good day.

"You're talking about curfews & the US military popping terrorists with drones?"

let's deliberately ignore everything else i've said, shall we?

i'm convinced over the 2-3 days you've not responded, you've suddenly forgotten. but ok

You're trying to debate around the margins of the issue rather than the meme I made. You've said:
'Fiery but mostly peaceful' was a joke to piss off the far right. Then you immediately follow it up with: 'the majority of the six months wasn't like that!'
So outta one side of your mouth you say: it WAS peaceful! & outta the other saying 'the liberals lied about the riots being peaceful to F with the right!' The thing about that is that I have a long enough memory to remember the riots. So your argument that I should ignore my eyes and ears and all media and all photos & only believe a random 'peaceful socialist' is really stretching it. If it was so peaceful we wouldn't need to discuss it, cause our cities wouldn't have been gutted warzones to begin with.
You can't have your Stalinist cake and eat it too. Either the far left travels back in time and calls for the immediate resignation of Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi & all the leaders of BLM for being on the record supporting violence or shut the [heck] up about 8 hours of right wing riots (which incidenly, Trump already condemned, something we've never got from Biden or Harris.)
But continue. Continue debating unrelated things. See how well that works out for you.

"You're trying to debate around the margins of the issue rather than the meme I made"

good. sometimes it's important to pay attention to detail. and holy crap, some details. literally every meme on the front page was about that one stupid headline.

"'Fiery but mostly peaceful' was a joke to piss off the far right. Then you immediately follow it up with: 'the majority of the six months wasn't like that!'"

my point was that it was made to piss off the far right. i never actually defended the rioting. show me where i did. the only way i'm """"""defending"""""" the rioting is by some magic, me disagreeing with you means i endorse anarchy. when i said the majority of the six months wasn't that, i mean that the arson was only in isolated incidents that got newsworthy attention. a weird choice of words, "fiery, but mostly peaceful protests," instead of just saying, "some guys committed arson." it's almost as if they wanted the negative attention.

"So outta one side of your mouth you say: it WAS peaceful!"

uh oh, some guy on imgflip doesn't know what grey areas are. typical imgflip user.

what i was saying was that it was meant to be peaceful, and a lot of cities didn't suffer from burning. a lot of the violence was provoked by cops and individuals undercover.

"outta the other saying 'the liberals lied about the riots being peaceful to F with the right"

they didn't lie about it being peaceful. they just worded the headline in a provocative way.

"The thing about that is that I have a long enough memory to remember the riots."

i got to remember the provocateurs and the violence against peaceful protestors. that's something. but yeah, just think about what the tv tells you to. look at the burning fire, sheeple. aren't you glad not to be one of them?

"If it was so peaceful we wouldn't need to discuss it, cause our cities wouldn't have been gutted warzones to begin with"

""""""warzones"""""" you have no right to call minneapolis a warzone until it starts looking like sarajevo or damascus.

"You can't have your Stalinist cake and eat it too"

people who compare others to nazis/commies can't debate for a dime, and shouldn't have a voice in politics.

"Either the far left travels back in time and calls for the immediate resignation of Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi & all the leaders of BLM for being on the record supporting violence or shut the [heck] up about 8 hours of right wing riots"

iT wAs OnLy EiGhT hOuRs
like that makes it ok to storm the capitol

There's a lot to unpack here. So I'm gonna do an abbreviated version:
●Your link goes a comment where you deny that antifa exists before refusing to support them. Which beside that fact that that's a massive lie, you didn't condemn anything if you deny it's exsistance. At some point it would be great if you would stop talking outta both sides of your mouth.
●'seeing the burning doesn't change what happened!' You're the one saying the commie riots weren't that bad.
●I never said I was ignoring the right's riots. I said you can't say one word about it because of your sides well documented support for commie riots. Hypocrisy only cuts one way here. I'm uniformly against all rioting. It didn't take me six months to suddenly be against political violence.
● YES your claim that the riots weren't too bad and the news lied about it is supporting political violence.
● 'plenty of people condemned the riots' Nope. Because you guys are on the record being for it before you were against it. Not u personally, but your side. The majority still lie and say the riots were mostly peaceful. Oh wait... yes YOU personally.
● my reference to the Antifa (excuse me, none existant idea!) Thugs trying to breach the White House was to remind you that you can't use the "butt breaching the carpital!" Argument. You conveniently forgot about your side's attempt to do the same thing.
Yes, I know. You didn't forget. You don't think the White House is part of the capital because TRUMP= BaD! HIm= RAcISt!
●You actually win the argument by using the word cuck. Turns out THAT was the non sequitur that would finally stop me from responding to your continuous 'throwing everything at the wall and hoping something sticks' bullcrap. Turns out (as we speak! Can u believe it?) My non existent wife it getting screwed up the bum by a super well hung liberal! You win. You must be proud. Damn proud!

"Your link goes a comment where you deny that antifa exists before refusing to support them."

are you illiterate? because nowhere did i deny antifa's existence. only an illiterate or a disingenuous person can bring up that conclusion

"At some point it would be great if you would stop talking outta both sides of your mouth."

you keep using that phrase without knowing what it means, or when to use it. literally all i did was point out about how a headline is weirdly worded and the people stupid enough to fall for it.

"'seeing the burning doesn't change what happened!' You're the one saying the commie riots weren't that bad."

i like how you put an exclamation point in my statement to turn it from a talking point into a strawman. this argument literally goes nowhere. also, gee i didn't know that being against police brutality was somehow communist. i thought it was quite the opposite.

"I said you can't say one word about it because of your sides well documented support for commie riots"

eyyy the all-powerful freedom of speech god says i can't talk about an issue because of something that happened that i had no control over. you would've been invaluable to the founding fathers when they were writing the constitution.

"'plenty of people condemned the riots' Nope. Because you guys are on the record being for it before you were against it. Not u personally, but your side"

my side? what, you mean libertarians? they endorsed the riots? also, just because you said "nope" doesn't mean you're correct.

"Oh wait... yes YOU personally"

gee that's quite the backtracking. a bold take, if i say so myself. i hope you can back it up with rock hard evidence.

"my reference to the Antifa (excuse me, none existant idea!) Thugs trying to breach the White House was to remind you that you can't use the "butt breaching the carpital!" Argument"

the supreme dictator of argumentation says i can't use a certain event for reasoning because of his illiteracy-- i mean, very good sense of understanding.

"You didn't forget. You don't think the White House is part of the capital because TRUMP= BaD! HIm= RAcISt!"

i never called trump racist throughout this discussion. how's the moral leverage? also, the white house is part of the capital, just not part of the capitol.

"You actually win the argument by using the word cuck"

cuck

You keep avoiding the issue because you don't have an answer.
My meme: liberals are all hypocrites because they pretend to be anti riot after 6 months of supporting commie violence. I didn't use those words but the message was clear.
You keep trying to talk in circles because of course you can't actually denounce your black hoodie antifa thugs. I'd snap shot the comment and get you kicked from your Bernie stream.
So here's the deal:
You claim your boys burning down my city repeatedly was mostly peaceful because they didn't burn down every city in the US and there were some

Protests in other cities that didn't involve burning. You know this to be BS. No one believes this.
You claim an 8 hour riot is worse than a six month riot because 'storming the crapital!' (Wink wink! Like if the far right were actually storming the capital we woulda brought black hoodies, stones, pipes, & phony bombs... That's not our MO...) and I didn't hear one word from the commies or liberals when antifa tried to storm the White House and then set DC on fire. That didn't bother you? Or it didn't count because the fires were mostly peaceful and no one you knew died? Again total BS.
I made this meme for you: The self righteous lefty that thinks they're gonna get a get outta jail free card for 6 months of bloody rioting because of one day of bloody right wing rioting.
So denounce your antifa thugs 6 months of bloody riots or pick a different meme to troll.

"You keep trying to talk in circles because of course you can't actually denounce your black hoodie antifa thugs"

eyyy a little research would've told you i already did that.

"I'd snap shot the comment and get you kicked from your Bernie stream."

snap this:
imgflip.com/i/4tkzvr#com8504537
or continue making bs talking points because it makes your point somehow valid

"You claim your boys burning down my city repeatedly was mostly peaceful because they didn't burn down every city in the US and there were some Protests in other cities that didn't involve burning. You know this to be BS. No one believes this"

seeing the burning at face-value also distorts the perception. still doesn't change anything that's actually happened.

"You claim an 8 hour riot is worse than a six month riot because 'storming the crapital!'"

i never said it was worse. i'm just pointing out that it's idiotic to ignore it, like you said you would.

"and I didn't hear one word from the commies or liberals when antifa tried to storm the White House and then set DC on fire"

because you didn't listen lol. i've heard plenty of people on the left condemn it.

"That didn't bother you? Or it didn't count because the fires were mostly peaceful and no one you knew died?"

it did. you just wish it didn't bother me for moral leverage points. disingenuous cuck

"So denounce your antifa thugs 6 months of bloody riots or pick a different meme to troll."

eyy already did that

"But continue. Continue debating unrelated things. See how well that works out for you."

happily will, because i like bringing up things no one expects, and it exposes everyone on the site for not really being qualifiable or knowledgeable for well-versed, grey-area-tackling political opinions, let alone convincing anyone that they're right.

The only reason you people refuse to debate the topics at hand is because you have no leg to stand on. The 'maybe so butt what about this unrelated topic! My uncle has a Cadillac!' Debating style isn't smart or sneaky. It's the last bastion of the highly educated yet woefully outclassed debater.

"The only reason you people refuse to debate the topics at hand is because you have no leg to stand on"

you know that's not true. my comment about the headline is still related. don't pretend no one else brings up red herrings. the reason why i brought up the headline was because it seemed disingenuous of the news to word it in some way and the right that pretends to be anti-media fall for it.

Nico Nico Nii Curse!

Noice!

NICO NICO NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Noice!👍