Hmm

I know that, but so many seem to believe you have to hate a sinner to hate a sin. If that is the case, then logically I can assume everyone pretty much hates everyone around them, because if you have to hate someone to hate something they do, and they’ve got some sin problem you can’t handle, then you hate them.

No.
But I'm not going to get into it

No, you disagree with someone in their believes, that doesn't mean you hate them as a person.

XD

What Puppy said, im not bothering

Just because you don’t agree with LGBTQ doesn’t mean you hate people who are part of the community.

I believe so too. I just have so many ppl that tell me otherwise.

Gasp, you can't think for yourself.

No you can easily disagree without hate! You can also have strong negative feelings about someone while agreeing with their philosophy or religion.

Yeah

Well no. I'm not in the mood for an argument so just don't reply, thanks.

I think my parents think lgbtq is wrong but they accept my uncle :/

I don't know of anybody who thinks Christianity is morally wrong. But you can still disagree with someone's religion and still love them as a person.

Yes i believe so, too. And I am the same with LGBTQ+. I believe it is morally wrong but can be friendly with people who support it and people who are a part of the community.

Immoral how?

Ayn Rand thought Christianity was morally wrong.

That's weird, but okay.

No one can legitimately say Christianity is “wrong” unless you’re some fundamentalist wacko. The ultimate goal of any religion is an enlightenment of some kind.

To say an LGTBQ+ is “wrong” is, in my opinion, defying the will of whatever ‘Creator’ you believe in as well as defying the laws of nature.

How exactly is it defying the laws of nature? A homosexual couple is not even capable of giving birth.

Just because homosexual couples can’t give birth does not make them unnatural. There are documented instances of homosexual couplings found throughout nature.

You are aware that penguins (who have been seen doing this) are also notorious for robbery? So just because an animal does something doesn’t make it right. Should we eat our children because Komodo dragons do it?

You’re equating homosexuality to cannibalism?

Seriously?

I mean female ducks are raped by the males does that make rape morally ok?

Hi Timber :)

I'm sorry who?

No, i didn’t equal them. I said “just because an animal does something doesn’t make it right”. What about that is equaling the two? I just simply gave an outrageous example no one would disagree with to prove my point.

You used a ridiculous example of equating eating children to two consenting adults engaging in sexual intercourse.

Penguins aren’t the only instances...and the “robbery” throw-in is laughable.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/gay-male-penguins-steal-lesbian-couple-s-eggs-dutch-zoo-n1244575

This one? They didn’t steal it to eat it.

Komodo dragons also have a limited geographic range and, as a result, limited food sources so if eating their young (as well as their old and sick) is the only way to continue to exist as a species, it’s natural.

I mentioned this to again prove the point that an animal behaving a certain way does not make it right. Why can’t you hear this point?

I know that. But should we do it and use them as an excuse to say it’s completely natural?

No, it was some troll named Madtitan. https://imgflip.com/i/4sfypa

Goodness. That’s just wrong.

He would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for my good friend Mooooooo coming in and clearing up the situation.

Hence the comments sign MT

Homosexuality is as natural as heterosexuality is. You can’t choose to be either. You either are or you aren’t.

And, ultimately, love is love.

Anonymous heads up. ClassConservativeCrusader and Camogirl.tn are Timber alts. It's Timber trying to groom y'all. Welcome. ~MT

What are you talking about?

It's okay, I've been accused of being an alt for timber and others. by some people. They would rather attack your character by saying we would be dishonest than actually argue a point

“Debate the ideas, not the person behind it”

It’s a solid creed to live by.

I’ve been accused of being bluessol’s alt b4

If it is, it’s the most pleasant he’s ever been.

Kudos.

Do you know who this deleted guy is talking about? and who's Timber?

Probably timber1972

He deleted for some reason.

He’s ‘grooming’ you. Common tactic used by online predators, like Timber-who is a classic sociopath. He was pulling the same crap with Kamizaze. until T17 was busted.

His other confirmed alts include:
https://imgflip.com/user/Craft_Werk

and

https://imgflip.com/user/ForeignForeigner

It’s part of some lame revenge scheme of his, doing his lame Pied Piper routine to infiltrate streams and get members banned if he can, etc.

This is a just a friendly ‘anonymous’ heads up. Do with that what you will. Ciao

Thank you kindly.

If what you’re saying is true (and I’ve previously suspected it was), so be it. One cannot be groomed if one does not actually give a damn about one’s account. If it makes Karen happy to think he’s playing Trojan Horse, play away.

It wouldn’t shock me if they were one and the same because it’s just the kind of lame thing he would do.

Did you know he challenged me to a physical fight, but when the challenge was accepted, Karen conveniently failed to mention a time and place, as I requested?

Typical internet pussy move.