Newsmax, Fox News, Lou Dobbs just aired these notes to "clarify" its coverage of Smartmatic and Dominion

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/28/dominion-tells-mellissa-carone-cease-defamatory-claims/4059316001/

Same laws Facebook Twitter and Google need to be bound by.

They already are if you use them to slander another. They’re just tools and platforms.

No they aren’t. They have 230 ’protections. Unlike news media or newspaper. They can’t be sued for libel or slander. If they could you would see a lot less of it.

The state censoring or regulating Twitter and FB for refusing to protect corrupt politicians like Trump is about as tyrannical as you can get- like Russian & China levels of oppression. GTFO with that anti-democratic sh**

What is Anti democratic is censorship, which is what these platforms have done with prejudice and bias. KMA, either they become publishers or stay out of the political debate in public access areas either virtual or real life. You are ok with Suckerberg deciding what you get to hear? And it’s ok because he’s not the government. Your sense of democracy is very shallow even for a leftist.

It’s not FB or Twitter’s job to make Trump look good, period

It’s not their job to make him look bad either period.

It’s there personal property. They are not newspapers. If it’s true, it ain’t defamation- that’s why Newsmax is walking back their comments.

Trump is free to go after individuals on social media . You go after the end users, not the tech. Kinda like you guys don’t want guns banned, only the killers, right? Irony is a funny unfaithful mistress, ain’t she?

The are protected by the 230 protections or they would have been sued a thousand times over. It is public access so their censorship has limitations to continue under the 230 protections. These will be repealed and they will have their private property and will allow no speech for fear of being sued. Good riddance. It is nothing like the second amendment protections of the right to bear arms.

Senate can’t do shit. You need both the house and the senate to agree to overturn electors. As if a democrat majority in the house would agree to that. They won’t even get that in the Senate now that Mitch has tuned Trump out. You are delusional.

As for social media, I hope those big corporations do get broken up. That’s a very ‘liberal’ wish we have. Glad to see you onboard, conservative. Whose having the last laugh?

Who said anything about electors? Your TDS is showing. The leftist media and their social media stooges will be dealt with. You ain’t got that much of a majority in the house. Only a few defectors, and there are lots of democrats who agree on big tech abuses, and it passes. The only question will be will China Joe protect those who helped him cheat to get elected by censorship.

FB and Twitter aren’t being regulated. Trump has been ousted, and that dream goes with him

We will see, senate is still investigating and it looks like
Google will be broken up withanti monopoly laws. Can’t wait hahahahah.

Your “Trump Defeated Syndrome” is clouding your judgement. That’s what it sounded like. It’s all your cult leader talks about these days. Doubt it that you’re not onboard with his latest coup attempt.

Except I don’t have a cult leader that’s what you fools don’t get with your agree or die tyranny. Trump is your cult. The Trump haters club that’s infected with TDS so virulent it drives you to insanity.

Lame. Violation of first Amendment

Violation of the first amendment is not allowing the Washington post to put out the Hunter Biden Story so you can help your candidate on a supposedly unbiased media which is a blatant violation of 230 protections

Funny you didn't mention Parler.

What about it? If they start making decisions on who is allowed to speak then they should forfeit the 230’protections as well. You can’t censor the debate and keep the protections. It’s that simple. You want to play like it’s freedom of speech, but when they censor debate it’s the exact opposite of freedom of speech. I doubt you care very much about speech freedom.

How about regulating OAN and Newsmaxx?

They are regulated as publishers. You just don’t like what they say. It’s not about regulating publishers, it’s about regulating people claiming they aren’t publishers to avoid the same regulation all publishers have.