System Lord Pelosi

Seriously, is she planning galactic domination with that outfit?

I love the Stargate Memes -- I don't agree with your message. Note that Pelosi agreed to give up her power rather than fight for it at the end of her term; the graceless would-be Goa'uld is the one desperately clinging to power.

I disagree. This election is more like the episode where Col. O'Neill was accused of murdering Senator Kinsey and everyine was trying to stop SG1 from proving otherwise.
When the Establishment Politicians accused Trump of Russian Collusion they got a multimillion multiple-year investigation. This election, they won't even investigate the cornucopia of affidavits and video of election meddling.
Watch Tim Pool. www.youtube.com/timcast

Well, this is tRump. Desperate to be worshipped, and already in the pocket of a hostile foreign power. When the head of Cybersecurity, the recent AG, and the Secretary of State all denounce Russia's cyber-infiltration and tRump tries to muddy the waters with an uninformed denial (oh, those missed security briefings!) it's pretty clear he's serving his true master and leaving our service people, government systems, and even private companies in the lurch.

And thus you prove yourself a low-information and zealous individual who will drink from naught but the teat of the mainstream churnalists who hate Trump.

Let me guess: you think burning buildings is "peaceful protest".

I am unaware of Governor Whitmer (the woman in your meme, btw) burning any buildings. Instead, she's weathered multiple threats from domestic terrorists as she tries to keep the people in her state safe.

Governor Whitmer has blatantly defied the order of the supreme court of her state and has opted to shut down her state via unconstitutional edict; this makes her a criminal.
I do not agree with the attempt to abduct her, nor do I support making threats on her life. I do support her arrest by proper authorities.
And the real domestic terrorists have burned down many buildings in what many politicians, even Whitmer, have called "peaceful protests", a blantant lie to their constituents.

She tested her executive authority; the Michigan Supreme Court rebuked her. That doesn't make her a criminal. It means that she's participating in the tripartite American system of government.

And, yes, some arson occurred around some few BLM protests. That doesn't make the majority of people who are standing up for Black rights terrorists. Again, think of it in the reverse: there are a few bad actors in the anti-abortion movement who have threatened and even killed clinic staff -- does that mean that protesting against abortion makes you a terrorist?

She's a criminal because she's stomping on the Constitution, which she is sworn to uphold. The Supreme Court said she couldn't and she's defying it, proving she's criminally authoritarian.

And people who rioted were not protesting for anyone's rights. They were terrorists who took advantage of a political situation to cause destruction and murder people; 30+ people were killed in thise riots by those terrorists.

Give me a specific citation for these 30 people. As far as I can tell, you're conflating mostly peaceful protests (yes, with a few bad actors) with terrorism. You're sounding very much like KIng George must have "those awful colonial terrorists . . . destroying commercial property".

Actual killings in this country, and acts of terror, have mostly been perpetrated by those on the right.

And about that "commercial property":
They didn't just destroy property; they destroyed black-owned and operated businesses. They destroyed jobs. The small business' insurance policies wouldn't even cover the rubble removal, so they couldn't rebuild like the bug corperations could.
They destroyed a firefighter's life-long dream of owning and operating a sports bar; they put it to the torch and then came back to rob his safe and it was caught on film by a news crew as they interviewed him on-site.

And how DARE you compare me to George the Tyrant! Me, whose family bleeds Red, White, and Blue! Me, who's currently serving to defend the freedom you enjoy without lifting a finger to defend it yourself!

I appreciate your service. The freedom you defend also includes the freedom to protest "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." I'm not condoning rioting or destruction, but I want you to keep your eye on the many thousands of people who are peacefully protesting in accordance with their First Amendment rights.

The same Congress that just passed a bill that sent millions of dollars to other nations under the guise of a stimulus? That's your source? Wow.

The same FBI that abused the FISA warrant system in order to spy in the Trump campaign? That blackmailed Flynn into pleading guilty to a crime he did not commit? The same FBI that assassinated a conservative because he held a protest in Oregon?

Whenever someone who has "right-wing" views attacks, they are condemned by conservatives, liberals, and leftists alike. Whenever a leftist attacks, the media covers it up or explains it away. The media hasn't covered even half of what Antifa does; hell, I'd be surprised if they even covered a quarter. They are constantly trying to denunk Andy Ngo, especially after he was brutally attacked by Antifa.

Rioting is not "peaceful protest". Looting is not "peaceful protest".
And if BLM were more proactive about getting rid of bad actors, they wouldn't be getting bad press. No, they were lax in their responsibilities and bad actors got the protestors all riled up and turned it into a riot.

Also, not Pelosi.