politics

Your "triggered" reply in defense of your emotions....just proves that you are an emotional parasite. The universe helps the person who is in a relationship with you but then it is 99.9% likely that you do not have one.
And your second whining episode was clear to everyone else but you and so I will make it clear for just you......"modern-day democrats, whose ancestors were the slave-masters of the Blacks...." I hope that this clarification for only you will make you happy but then I doubt that it will....

Hahhaha...Only to you, everyone else understood what I had meant.

I'm really enjoying this. I hope it continues.

Naw! It is dead....He (or she or it) finally realized that "zee" is slow on the uptake! Cannot help it as "zee" (have to be politically correct here) with tail between the legs and pitiful whimpering and all....scuttling away, before I whack it like a bug!

My pronoun is 'Trump won"

Shame. Been heavy on the quotes there. Doesn't really deconstruct what you were saying, repeating it and saying you're wrong.

My last comment was just to get you to make another triggered response...and then I left you for 19 hours to stew, as I have a life but not you as you are stuck in your grandma's basement sponging off of those poor feeble folks. Triggering libbies never fail as you are so tightly wound up and ready to be triggered every second. I am just shocked that you had only made two comments instead of 10! Psst! Psst! You guys never seem to get that one response is enough....but then again I know that your thoughts come in bits and pieces. Naw! We conservatives are quite precise in what we say....everyone here understood what I was saying except low uptake you! Don't blame me if your uptake is really low....just blame your darn useless parents (based of the fact that anyone one who could make something like you have to be useless. And what did you go for when you had first commented? Yeah! Right!....my English, rather than to face the fact that it was YOUR liberal ancestors who were the slave owners, and not the Conservatives.

Democrats (liberals...same thing....are you going to argue that they are not one and the same?) fought to preserve slavery? You are fuc@ing nuts! Is that what they had taught you in college? Or did you learn that from CNN on one of your long hauls (I know that you are falsely claiming that you have a job but I know that you had been huddling in your basement for the last 20 years and sneaking up every now and then to raid grandma's fridge). Hahaha! Yeah! Liberals are quite good at changing or obscuring history to hide their nasty slave master days and they can as they own the universities and every single history professor is now a liberal....and they are the ones who are rewriting America's history today.

Name me one Conservative who had owned a slave at the cusp of the American War in 1860.

Ever since the Democratic Party was formed in 1829, its members have fought against every major civil rights initiative and have a long history of discrimination. They had defended slavery, had started the Civil War, had opposed Reconstruction, had founded the Ku Klux Klan (TWICE), had imposed segregation, had perpetrated lynchings, and had fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and the 1960s.

Now look at the Republican Party was founded in 1854 in comparison, as an anti-slavery party. Its driving goal was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories and to eliminate it. This goal was thwarted by the Supreme Court. In the 1857 case
Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court ruled that slaves were NOT citizens but property. The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery were all Democrats. The two justices who dissented were both Republicans.

Oh shit! You are now going to claim that the parties had flipped right? But that would be like trying to convince someone that all the cops decided to become fiendish bandits and all of the bandits decided to become virginal cops. That is so ludicrous that it is not worth a second thought unless of course, you are a liberal who was taught to believe what has been stuffed down their small feeble minds without questioning....rather than to question and do their own research....in other words, to think for themselves. Sigh! If this is your belief then name me 2 Senators who had switched from the racist democrats to become virginal Republicans and 2 Republicans who had become fiendish liberals?

You are just playing with the word "conservative".....Of course, the democrats had conservative values in the 1800s and early 1900s....almost everyone then had conservative values as America (as was most of the world at that time) was a conservative society. They were just were NOT the Conservative Republican Party....They were then the racist democrat party who at that time had conservative values in a conservative society....But oh my how far left have they fallen since then. America has moved leftwards since then (as has most of the Western world)....both the democrats as well as the Conservatives. John F. Kennedy would be recognized as a raving mouth-frothing Rightie today based on his policies and his largely conservative values when compared to today's standards.

What a magnificently bad choice. William Aiken Jr was a democrat party U.S. House of Representatives from the democrat state of South Carolina's which was the FIRST state to secede from the Union. He had represented the 6th district of SC from March 4, 1851, to March 3, 1853. I WILL REPEAT....He was NOT a Republican but a member of the democrat Party. He did not want secession (not every racist slave-owning member of the democrat party had wanted to secede) but you can judge a person by the friends that he keeps, as every single one of his friends was a secessionist. But if that is the best that you have then it is the best that you have.

You said that "Modern Democrats support supported civil rights legislation". Yeah! Much of this is made by the democrats with their boasts of this being one of their greatest accomplishments. But the records paint a different picture....if you look at the record on who had voted for that law, then you will see that only 63% of Congress's democrats had voted for the Civil Rights while about 80% of the Republicans had voted in favour. In the Senate, it was 69% of democrats VS 82% of the Republicans who had voted in favour of the CR Bill. Without the Republicans' massive endorsement, those Civil Rights Legislations would NEVER have passed. I should also point out that of those racist democrats who had voted against that bill, were 20 of 21 (DixieCrats) Southerners (the descendants of the democrat party's slave-owning class of the 1800s) had voted against it.