If you read Maslow's hierarchy of needs, it's clear that human beings needs are progressive, in that they build upon each other. If a more basic need at the bottom of the pyramid is unmet, the higher needs are not attainable.Don't be deluded by this theoretical "proper socialist structure", it has never been accomplished because it goes completely against the nature of mankind.
Long ago communists set in play a plan to destroy the United States and publically declared their goals of discrediting the founding and founders of the United States (you can google the 1963 45 Communist Goals which were entered into the Congressional Record) In these Goals, numbers 29-31 have done the greatest harm to understandinng the truth.
Accurate history has been withheld and distorted for generations now. Search engines like google have eliminated links to historical documents, but occassionally you can get to the truth. Look up Governor William Bradford, leader of the Pilgrims who came to Plymouth Rock. The place where they landed had been abandoned by the native Americans there, and the initial form of government was socialist in nature. Everyone worked and put their produce from commonly held property in a common storehouse. The colony was starving to death, because as Bradford explained the young men were reluctant to do work to provide for another man's family. When he granted ownership of landand each family had self determination of their efforts and produce, the colony thrived with an overabundance of food and resources, and from this abundance people were able to exchange their excess for the skills and production of others- the free market worked and the socialist experiment failed. Finding the real truth is more difficult, one book that explains and documents this is called "The Light and the Glory"
Another example of the collasal lie is the 3/5ths compromise in the Constitution. For years socialists have said this is baked in racism in our founding, but as escaped slave Frederick Douglas came to understand, without the compromise, two nations would have emerged on the continent, one free and one slave. Instead of calling slaves less than human as many believe, the compromise was solely about slave states trying to count slaves as free for purposes of the census which determined representation in Congress. As Douglas explained, the brilliance of the compromise was that it was designed to end slavery through political work as the free states outnumbered and
