Anarcho-collectivism

My example is currently occurring in capitalist countries. Your example could not happen under anarchist communism because there would be no state, there would be no money, and obviously if you were starving you would obviously not be receiving everything that you need. If there was a shortage of food, another collective’s surplus would be given to the collective in need. Production would ensure that necessities are satisfied first.

"anarchist communism" is a self contradiction as communism requires a state. And you just gave an example where it could happen in your refutation and showed state level decision happening.

That is not state level decision. Anarchist institutions like worker’s committees have delegates that voice the needs of their collective. Communism is the abolition of private property, the state and wage labor and money. What about this seems contradictory to anarchism to you? Perhaps you are thinking of the transitional state that Marx talks about, but anarcho-communists reject.

State: a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government.

Nothing that I just described fits that definition. Lmao.

Except that it fits squarely under the deifinition. " Anarchist institutions like worker’s committees have delegates that voice the needs of their collective." There's your government leadership, and you have defined it as a republic.

There are no hierarchical institutions, production and structure is decentralized, and there is no central authority establishing, defending and maintaining labor exploitation or the will and wealth of the ruling class. Nobody considers it a government or a state because it isn't.