No, all the media are not fake news. I never said that. Sure, there are a lot of so called journalists who feel it is their job to tell the public what to think. I find them easy to spot, but you... apparently not so much.
The bottom line is you cannot discredit my point by making an extreme, irrelevant point like that. Your tactics are quite clear and ineffective.
As for Project Veritas, even you should be able to imagine that they are a target of many kinds of media, not just liberal media. And I'm sure that some of what they have done is questionable due to their agenda, and should be investigated by serious journalists. I'm not sure the Guardian qualifies, but you seem to give them credence.
I treat Project Veritas like I do any other purveyor of information, be it the New York Times, CNN, FOX News, Washington Post, NewsMax, etc., etc., meaning I don't instantly believe any of what they say without checking into it. You don't strike me as having that same philosophy.
What we can say for sure about Project Veritas, is that in many cases they release an entire video or audio, and what was said cannot be denied. I haven't heard all that they've released regarding CNN, but it doesn't take a serious journalist to see that what's been reported that Zucker has said is more likely true than not, and the context is clear. All you have to do is watch their network for a half hour or so at random times to see that they have a transparent agenda, and that agenda is not reporting the news objectively.