What are you gibbering about now? Evidence of crimes are reviewed in a court presided by a judge. Every judge makes a commitment to that job. My uncle's a judge, been targetted for assassination by the Mafia for forty years, still puts them away like it's just his day job.
If a judge feels personally threatened by a case, they declare a mistrial and it goes to another judge.
But if a judge strikes down evidence because it just doesn't prove the charges, that's just shitty evidence. That's not a conspiracy to discredit evidence, that's literally evaluating the evidence and finding it lacking.
Or prove that they're being blackmailed or something, but then you just have the same problem all over again. Either way, stop wasting everybody's time including your own by doubling down on these unprovable mystery-boxes.