Curfew is useless...

4b4h81.gif (click to show) He's right you know

48albu.gif (click to show) Thank you my good man

Rioting and looting can't spread the covid because the covid knows which side of the political spectrum you are on. Therefore, since rioting and looting supports the far left communist agenda it gets a pass. Lol 😉

LOL

So you condemn the ANTIFA riots?

Good, because many leftists don’t.

Ok good.

Hehehe

I'll just leave this here. Supporting rioting and arson if things don't go your way is the very definition of supporting rioting and arson...

Hehehe. Good try. You supported someone threatening to "burn it all down," If they got a supreme court justice they didn't like. WE know what that means. U know what that means. EVERYONE knows what that means. That means u support voting with motive cocktails if you don't get your way. Don't try to weasel out of it now using your finely tuned debating skills. And don't pretend to be anti- rioting if you're only anti rioting after it becomes politically adventurous to be anti- rioting.
God bless.

The comment refers to 'burning it down.' You know what that means. The left REALLY knows what 'burning it down' means. And you know that 'burning it down' is direct reference to arson and rioting. Another thing the left knows all about.
Like I said: don't try to weasel out of it. You got caught. Don't feel bad, you're not the only person to get caught in their hypocrisy this year.

That's right, in the year 2020, the year of liberals and commies literally burning cities down for 5 months we are supposed to believe a liberal commie threatening to burn things down if he doesn't get his way is a clever euphemism for playing cards against humanity or sending angry tweets. Good try.
Btw: as soon as you get to the Bill Clinton 'that depends on what the meaning of is is,' argument, the debate is over.
Have a good day.

Besides that the second part is incorrect. Saying,”we will burn the entire thing down” is specific. “Entire” encompasses all buildings. They are threatened specifically even though entire is broad it is still specifically targeting everything.

Tweet? In the meme response in the Kermit part is rebutting a threat.

He says burn it all down. That’s a direct threat

Wrong, that is most certainly a threat that could get you arrested depending on circumstances.

The response in support of the tweet does and uses it as the base of argument that it is not a terroristic threat. The threat to burn it all down is a terroristic threat even it doesn’t specify specifics.

Doesn’t have to specify to be a terroristic threat. A threat is a threat broadness or scope doesn’t negate it.

No it actually is

It’s a terroristic threat regardless the same as saying we are gonna kill all white people. You don’t have to specify which white people you are going to kill in order for it to be a threat.

Regardless I don’t support hate speech or terroristic threat laws unless they show a clear intention of carrying it out and having the means to do it.

State laws vary but yes in California based on certain criteria in regards to intent and ability.

Everything

It’s specifies everything

That's right. But the point of posting this was, who made this meme originally. A lot of people on imgflip supported the riots by 1st denying their existence then claiming they were mostly peaceful then claiming they were the far far right's fault then claiming they had never supported them...

Ah ok 👍

Preach, man, preach.👍