It's Over Donald!

40 Trump lawsuits and not a single bit of evidence was presented. Conspiracy theories don't work in court. Even Rudy told a judge "this is not a fraud case".

Well that's going beyond fake news and into paranoid delusion territory.

Nice to move those goalpost there. Why don't you go back and read the comment I replied to and see how your now saying something different.

Falsehoods and faulty reasoning to get what you want, rather than seek the truth. That's why you shouldn't use either.

pure malarkey

How old are you? Malarkey?

I was mocking your hero, Biden, you ignorant ass.

Whatever...
Who cares what you think. Certainly not me.

Wrong number of cases by Trump, he won a few because he had evidence presented in court. You also have a out of context quote about a non-fraud case as well. So basically the whole comment was based on fake news.

And prove me wrong is not a good standard and frequent from people that dish out fake news so they do not have to prove their own arguments. Also quite of bit of evidence of election irregularities and some outright fraud have been produced. So more fake news to backup your fake news.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/dozen-compelling-pieces-evidence-voting-irregularities-2020-election

sure ignore the evidence and insult to cover, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/group-files-emergency-petition-wisconsin-after-finding-potentially-150000

Man, this has aged badly

Not really, not only is latch not allowed to change the constitution of Penn by case law (see the minority opinion), the litigator wouldn't have standing to sew until after injury occurred (that means an election has to happen first), and they only asked for court to find a remedy (that doesn't mean throw out votes).

Considering these three facts it is a garbage ruling meant to sidestep the issue rather than do there job. So a blatantly unconstitutional law is left on the books.

You don't have standing to sue until you have an injury, so he couldn't sure until after the election by the law. Also the ruling didn't cover when they learned that the law was unconstitutional as thus assumes a major part of latch which is supposed to be an affirmative ruling. Additionally not applying here did come from experts as it is part of the minority opinion.

And then even without relief on this election, the unconstitutional law is still left on the books when it should be thrown out. Given this and that the ruling was on strait party lines, I say that it is a garbage ruling.

Thoe dost project too much

Thou*. My bad...

Great...another low-IQ disciple of
Vag inalCanal who thinks I'm a limey.

Can't you think and speak for yourself, or are you a born follower?

Nonsense...post that screen shot. You won't because you can't.

Rudy did make the statement: https://time.com/5914377/donald-trump-no-evidence-fraud/

Still out of context statements that do not give credence to the underlying claim. Sorry that you don't know that in a court case, you stick to the issue being litigated rather than bring in issue that would need to be settled in completely different suits.

Your comments are all batshit crazy just like the arguments made in all the election fraud lawsuits that were laughed out of court.

The cases brought to court where not based on election fraud, so as you can see the very bases of your beliefs is based off of a lie, which you then insult me for correcting to cover for your lack of facts.