It's not the count, it's what they're counting

This isn't about Trump or Biden. This is about election fraud. If Biden won fair and square, I'm good with that. That's democracy. Voter fraud is not democracy. This, and all future elections, need to be protected.

Ah, another thoughtful comment. So rewarding.

LOL Seriously, though. IMO there should be no room for any fraud, period.

If you can prove that 300 votes are fraudulent, the courts are happy to knock 300 off the total and nobody would ever argue. But nobody is telling Biden to go home over 300 votes.

That's not what these lawsuits and recounts are about. They're about insisting that hundreds of thousands of votes be declared illegal (state law applies, by the way, so they weren't) and THEN recounted. And THAT is some bullshit. This isn't about how much room for fraud there is, this is about how much fraud you can prove happened.

So you're trying to look like you're the neutral ground guy saying "oh, but fraud isn't a Trump versus Biden thing" - but we can see through you more than you realize. Independent researchers have been saying FOR DECADES that fraud is much more rare than Republicans have been claiming that it is and behold, the moment came to show proof that they were right the whole time, and they didn't have any.

I don't have the patience. You don't care about fraud, serious or innocuous. You just don't like Democrats.

Go to YouTube and watch "Interview with Source on Electronic Vote Fraud." Scary. Also, you don't know me at all, yet you claim to through a few memes and comments? Please. We could be standing next to each other at Starbucks and neither one of us would ever know it. I believe in democracy, and I am old school. Before Obama when an election was over, it was over. Better luck next time getting the candidate you support into office. And, I don't hate anyone. I can disagree with you, but I don't hate you. Truth.

No.

No no no and no.

If you have evidence, go straight to the courts with that shit.

The judges were not impressed and have thrown all accusations of fraud right the f**k out of court.

You don't get to tell me to watch your videos. No. You take that evidence to court. I'm not interested. As far as I'm concerned, no proof has turned up, no proof has been recognized, Biden won, end of story.

So what you're saying is that if it's not on CNN, it's not credible? I share the link, which contains evidence, by the way, to expand, to broaden, to enlighten, to consider an alternative. Sticking your head in the sand does not mean the evidence is not there. Look beyond what the media is pumping out, and look at the data sets coming from the swing states. Everything points to voter fraud like we've never seen before.

COURT

CREDIBLE EVIDENCE GETS HEARD IN COURT!

Not on YouTube. Not on CNN. In court. You prove it in court.

Because your problem right now is that NONE OF THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN!!!

Well, time will tell, and we shall see. I believe the data indicates a need to have an investigation, gather the evidence, and reveal the truth. And, actually, one can just as easily say for YOU to prove that there was no fraud. Because what you're saying is that there was no fraud? Zero? Everything was legit? "Come on, man." Have you looked at the numbers? The anomalies? The 2020 election numbers results are so skewed from established trends that have been consistent for generations, that the only answer is outside influence.

Nice try, but what argument? It's not a debate when you will not consider the other side and simply just state what you believe. Which, in your case, is unsubstantiated and based purely on emotion. You are in denial, use vulgarity, and indicate yelling by typing with all caps. Which further indicates that your thought process is emotional, not logical.

F**king hell

WE CAN TELL NOW! THE JUDGES HAVE THROW ALL THE LAWYERS FOR THIS OUT ON THEIR ASS!

There's no time will tell about it: the time to make your proof was NOW and y'all failed to do so in court!

Struck a nerve there, huh? Triggered? You mad, bro? Your head IS in the sand.

A lot of people say that when they lost an argument.

I honestly don't know if they are capable.

Yeah, it's almost like there was no point in even asking for a recount.

You haven't proven fraud so the recount was the same.

Exactly.

I feel like you haven't quite noticed that the point undermines your meme, not reinforces it.

The recount considered all votes that were submitted, and were generally accurate. They need to prove which votes are fraudulent and omit them from the valid votes. That is how I interpreted your comment. How does that undermine the meme?

Because if people weren't going to accept the recount anyway because they're never happy with the unproven and unprovable amount of fraud that could still be out there maybe, then what's even the point?