Affidavits not evidence?

Liberal view on this situation:

1. You must prove ballots are fake before seeing any ballots.
2. You must prove vote numbers are incorrect before a recount
3. You must show there is enough fraud to swing an election to investigate fraud that could swing an election
4. Anything that is found and rectified doesn't count.

Also..
Sworn testimony = anecdotal
Fake/invalid ballots = human error
Machine flipping votes = glitch

and also liberals:
'Theres no evidence'

That's funny, I thought anonymous sources and nameless whistle blowers were like undeniable proof.

Affidavits must be signed by the person making the claim, and it is a crime to file a false one.

Was being sarcastic about double standards...

Online it is hard to tell the difference. See Poe's Law.