[warning: satirical content]

Sources?

Do you not know how to google a headline?
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54874120

I don't google. I use other sites that are actual search engines and not media information control engines.
BBC, what would they know about US elections?
Responding to the actual article 30 people as a sample size out of 10,000 not even close to accurate. That's like +/- 20% accuracy or something.

It's not my fault your google-fu isn't good to circumvent their control.
You should also probably go to dictionary.com and look up the word "projection" in the context of statistics. If you pull 30 random names out of a basket of 10,000... Well, that's pretty telling.

No, I use other search engines so I don't have to circumvent their control. Its a quality of life choice.
You need to learn some maths. 30 names out of 10,000 is a tiny sampling that is very inaccurate.
Example: you pull 3 black or white marbles out of 10, two are black. Therefore 66% or more should be black right? Well it turns out that 5 are black and 5 are white. In order to get accurate results you must draw a certain percentage of the total out at random.
Here's a primer https://greatbrook.com/survey-statistical-confidence-how-many-is-enough/
0.3% of the population was checked. Look at the chart in the link above. That's more than +/-20% variance. That means it could be off by as much as 40%.

funny, tbh he is alive