Statistics

Even with voting being mandatory voting and internet voting, places have trouble getting past 90% due to the rolls not being updated properly. 100% plus equa fraud though.

not sure what you are smoking. if you look at the court transcripts from last night, Rudy went on and on and on about voters fraud and finally when the judge asked him why he kept mentioning it without offering any evidence he admitted there was no fraud and dropped it. they feed you this information through right wing outlets but admit there's nothing to it in the real world. it's called compartmentalization - something liars, gangsters and psychopaths do quite quite often.

sad watching you turds gaslight each other and then get gaslighted

Citation need, but thanks for talking about something else entirely and then accessing me of gaslighting when you ignore the actual topic and reason.

www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/11/18/mark-aronchick-rudy-giuliani-pennsylvania-election-case-vpx.cnn

There's one, an account by opposing counsel.

Not that it matters, in next day or so the Judge will rule against Rudy.

So hearsay instead of a proper citation, but why did you make a claim if it doesn't matter?

"On Wednesday, a federal judge in Pennsylvania rejected the Trump campaign’s request for an additional evidentiary hearing over its effort to invalidate the vote in the state over a set of technicalities"
slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/11/trump-rudy-giuliani-pennsylvania-lawsuits-not-coherent.html

The Judge wouldn't do that if real evidence existed or was being offered, nitwit

LOL, you have to actually see the evidence to judge if it is real, but you proved it was offered and denied it,

And how is that hearsay, ignoramus? He's an officer of the court reporting on what actually happened in court. He's not a witness. There are court transcripts. The lawyer made a public statement. If what he said wasn't true, Team Trump certainly would shred him over it as they need every advantage they can get. This case is being closely monitored. Pull your head out of your ass. sheeeesh Or get a lexusnexus account like I have for school and simply look up the transcripts themselves. They are public since the case falls within the realm of the public interest. I want to discuss the courts and facts and you think you are Mulder from the X-files

Telling what someone else said is the definition of hearsay. You even went to a person that has a stake in the claim and thus would have a built in bias and are trying to argue that it some how has the weight of a transcripts which you have not offered and claimed they are not a witness when that also falls squarely under the definition.

Hearsay: the report of another person's words by a witness, which is usually disallowed as evidence in a court of law.
Witness: a person who sees an event, typically a crime or accident, take place.

As you have denied basic definitions when they do not go your way, you have shown yourself to be extremely biased.

Shusssh. News flash:

A federal judge in Georgia rejected an election lawsuit brought by a Republican elector, Lin Wood, who had alleged in court constitutional violations, perceived fraud in the presidential election and sought to block the certification of election results.
"There's no doubt an individual's right to vote is sacrosanct," Judge Steven Grimberg in the Northern District of Georgia said Thursday evening. But, that "does not mean individual voters have the right to dictate" how votes are cast or decided to be counted.

Also a state judge in Pennsylvania rejected an attempt by the Trump campaign to throw out more than 2,000 absentee ballots for technical reasons.

Baldi, in his opinion on Thursday, made clear fraud was not an issue.
"It must be noted that the parties specifically stipulated in their comprehensive stipulation of facts that there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots. There is nothing in the record and nothing alleged that would lead to the conclusion that any of the challenged ballots were submitted by someone not qualified or entitled to vote in this election," he wrote. "At no time did Petitioners present evidence or argument to the contrary." Grimberg's ruling on Thursday, spoken from the bench, shuts down new rounds of lawsuits in multiple ways.

Judge Steven Grimberg is a Trump appointee. He's in on the fix too?

This nice hat trick of losses were the latest round of defeats for the Trump campaign. Funny how these Judges, many of them Republican, don't seem affected by your sound legal reasoning and your allegations of fallacious logic. Guess they don't have the same level of expert knowledge in the law as you do, dolt

So you changed the subject and even included a non-Trump lawsuit.

The first, individuals do have a right to sue over constitutional violations that affect them, calling them a peon doesn't change that. Had you given a quote that no violation took place that would be different from saying equal protection doesn't apply because your not a big enough group.

The second, which challenged ballots? The context is missing so I cannot judge this. The only case I'm aware of had curing done in different ways and instruction to cure in violation of the law, which the judge refused to acknowledge.

You have google, lazy ass. Look it up yourself.

Maybe if you only listen to newsmax and Trump you might think you bois are winning this.

In the real world, Trump is getting his a$$ handed to him in the courts.

Next up, GA finishes up its recount and is on track to certify President Biden's win. Getting tired of all this winning here

LOL, it's up to you to prove your own claim. 3q0s3d.jpg (click to show)

More Good news for ya.

HEADLINE- Georgia confirms Biden victory and finds no widespread fraud after statewide audit

Georgia has finished its statewide audit, lead mostly by Republicans, of the razor-thin presidential race and President-elect Joe Biden defeated President Donald Trump, according to a news release from the Secretary of State's office.

Biden beat Trump by 12,284 votes, according to the final results from the audit. This is a slight drop for Biden compared to the pre-audit results.

Officials have said repeatedly that the audit confirmed there was no widespread fraud or irregularities in the election.

All this winning is making me sleepy.

Yah, not to mention the three counties that dropped votes for Trump where they state we took the governments word they did nothing wrong and not bothering to check the signatures that would revel fraud the easiest way or checking for fraud in any other way, but just recounting votes. In which they found large stacks of crispy clean unfolded ballots that appeared to have machine printed marks that where nearly all for Biden.

https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1329110955020709894?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1329110955020709894%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theepochtimes.com%2Fgeorgia-poll-worker-says-she-found-pristine-batch-of-ballots-that-went-98-for-joe-biden_3584493.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBdfxJdlvcE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_Gq-2dQ-ow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNhGbSK3gd8

No, burden of proof is on you losers making the accusations. This is a court matter, not some high school debate where you can win by proving the other side forgot to address an argument or some other creative bulls***.

In case you missed it, high school master debater.

HEADLINE- Georgia confirms Biden victory and finds no widespread fraud after statewide audit

Georgia has finished its statewide audit, lead mostly by Republicans, of the razor-thin presidential race and President-elect Joe Biden defeated President Donald Trump, according to a news release from the Secretary of State's office.

Biden beat Trump by 12,284 votes, according to the final results from the audit. This is a slight drop for Biden compared to the pre-audit results.

Officials have said repeatedly that the audit confirmed there was no widespread fraud or irregularities in the election.

All this winning is making me sleepy.

LOL, no it is up to you tp prove your own independent claim, rather than for me to prove you wrong. And the recount didn't check for voter fraud, but did find a massive number of uncounted votes, that the news takes the states word that it was just complete and utter incompetency rather than a deliberate act (without evidence as the media likes to say when they doesn't like what is said).

Oops evidence of fraud to be adjudicated, ttps://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1329110955020709894?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1329110955020709894%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theepochtimes.com%2Fgeorgia-poll-worker-says-she-found-pristine-batch-of-ballots-that-went-98-for-joe-biden_3584493.html

I don't know why it's so hard for Trumpers to get through their heads. If you don't trust American news outlets, by all means, check out foreign ones. Trump supporters are in the minority. That's a FACT.

You haven't even bothered to educate yourself a bit on the topic. It isn't about the a skew toward anti-Trump voters as you'll need a huge surge of pro-trump voters to get the numbers that high and is near impossible with compulsory voting and extra easy access, so that is just a red herring.

Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

"Watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway.

You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't.

Voting is compulsory in Gabon, but it is not enforced; even in Australia where it is enforced, where you can vote by post or online and can be fined for not voting, turnout only reaches 90-95%.

The main reason that a full turnout is practically impossible is that electoral registers, even if they are recently compiled, can rarely be 100% up-to-date."

Here's that article from BBC.

Too bad a careful audit ran by Republicans found bupkis

HEADLINE- Georgia confirms Biden victory and finds no widespread fraud after statewide audit

Georgia has finished its statewide audit, lead mostly by Republicans, of the razor-thin presidential race and President-elect Joe Biden defeated President Donald Trump, according to a news release from the Secretary of State's office.

Biden beat Trump by 12,284 votes, according to the final results from the audit. This is a slight drop for Biden compared to the pre-audit results.

Officials have said repeatedly that the audit confirmed there was no widespread fraud or irregularities in the election.

Yeah so thats what was expected, they recounted the votes and found missing ones.
Now they need to actualy verify votes are correct. What you do when you actually audit the votes for their integrity not recount the votes and label it an audit. They did audit just not the kind required when people have signed affidavits that signatures weren't verified amongst other things.
Anyways the real fraud will have been done electronically, if it can be proven is another thing.

No proof of electronic fraud. You may as well blame extraterrestrials by this point. Could isn't the same as did. It's the dog ate the homework excuse. Time for the nation to move on. Trump lost. If he doesn't stop he risks losing twice and going down in history as the worst President.