1. ?
2. Sweden is doing horribly right now and its response was bad. Even if their response was good, you're cherry picking one country that didn't wear masks (and pretending that its "success" was caused by lack of mask wearing, thereby committing a correlation causation fallacy) in contravention with the unequivocal scientific consensus on masks, which is that they work.
https://time.com/5899432/sweden-coronovirus-disaster/
3. Let me fix what I said. He *tried* to cut the CDC. Still bad. Cutting the funding of the WHO during a global pandemic under any other president would be out of question ludicrous. But since it's Trump, you'll defend it. There are ways to criticize the WHO without cutting its funding, which tangibly cost lives and hurts the virus response of many countries.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/23/trumps-cuts-who-funding-irresponsible-irrational-simply-wrong/
4. Studies have shown that protests have not raised covid numbers in any meaningful sense, due to them all being outside with high rates of mask wearing and other safety measures (besides social distancing). The same cannot be said for Trump rallies, which have extremely low rates of mask wearing and adherence to other safety measures, and some of them are held inside.
5. *ORIGINATED* in China. The fact that it originated in China does not excuse Trump's objectively atrocious response to the coronavirus domestically. Additionally, in order to prove China even had any fault whatsoever in America's abject failure of a response, you would have to prove that China deliberately spread the coronavirus to the US. Until you can, I kindly ask you to f**k off with this claim.
6. He's still trying to, it doesn't make it any better.
The only one with a short memory is you.