The Ultimate Race Map - This map details the geographical origins of the seven races of the world. It is the first-ever race ma

where did you get that from? pretty sure it's inaccurate in a couple of places. My understanding of africa is that black africans were a tiny minority in Africa and that the majority population was the Khoisan people, followed by the Berber in the north of the continent, and I'm pretty sure the Berber weren't semitic i.e. middle eastern ...i could be wrong, but that's my understanding

I designed it myself and it's based off of genetics and history. Berbers are definitely Middle Eastern. Google image Algerians, Tunisians, Moroccans etc and you'll see what they look like. They are not Black or White. They are Middle Eastern.

my understanding was that the Arabs invaded North Africa and (mostly) drove out the Berber, but you're saying they're indigenous?

where are you getting your info?

You answered your own question. Berbers came from Arabs and both are indigenous to the greater Middle East hence they are both part of the Middle Eastern race.

Berbers aren't Arab, they're practically caucasian

can i have this image in a better format for my job role its blurred?

Sure, here is a HD version of The Ultimate Race Map https://i.redd.it/52512599xxo71.jpg You can download the image there. If you have any problems, let me know.

This is a link to a HD updated version of this map: https://i.redd.it/52512599xxo71.jpg

For those who want to download/share this map go to https://i.redd.it/gxrep7np8cv51.jpg

The Ultimate Race Map - This map details the geographical origins of the seven races of the world. It is the first-ever race map to show the natural blend from one population to the next.

You're using a theory that was rejected over a hundred years ago.

You're thinking of the whole Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Negroid, Australoid theory that was based off of skull shapes and appearances only. This isn't a theory. It's basic science using genetics, haplogroups etc. It's obvious to anyone with functioning eyeballs and a brain.

No, Only, it isn't. The genetic differences across the human species is too small and nuanced to really be measurable. Even things like ancestry.com are known to be too vague to be scientifically useful.

The science has moved on from this. Leave it behind, before you get left behind with it.

" The genetic differences across the human species is too small and nuanced to really be measurable."

Which is why we can distinguish by sight someone of pure African ancestry from someone of pure European ancestry. Do you actually believe this bullshit?

Yes, Only, it is. A five-year old can tell the difference between an Asian and a Black but the genetic differences are too small to be measured? Don't overthink things...you might be smarter than this.

It's past time you learned: EVERYTHING is more complicated than it is when you're 5 years old. What you're looking at is maybe one gene to control melatonin production out of 30,000. What you can see is controlled by a tiny amount of the genome. The differences between us are almost entirely social by construction.

And anyone who thinks that they can stop learning about genetics after what they're taught in high school probably didn't even do that well in high school.

There is ZERO scientific evidence that disproves race - on the other hand, there is overwhelming empirical and genetic evidence proving that not only does race exist, it exists in the exact clusters displayed on this map. Yet according to you, planets must now be social constructs too considering Pluto was a planet for 76 years until 2006 then poof...overnight there were only 8 planets in our solar system. I don’t really waste time arguing with race deniers. It’s like debating flat earthers or creationists. It’s amusing for a second but quickly gets old. Fortunately, there’s not many of them. Thanks for the laughs, though!

Yes, the criteria between a planet and a celestial dwarf is pretty f**king arbitrary. What a terrible example to illustrate what you thought was your point.