[original unwholesome accompanying text in comments lol]

im a christian and wHY HAVENT PEOPLE DISCOVERED THAT JESUS DOES NOT HATE HOMOS HE HATES PEDOS OH MY GOD

1 Corinthians 6:9 “Do not be misled. Those who are sexually immoral, ... , men who submit to homosexual acts, men who practice homosexuality ... will not inherit God’s Kingdom.”

well, the first anti-homosexual verse was mistranslated and in fact anti-pedophilia. i believe that at that time people were using a translation of the old testament, like the aramaic one or something, so paul might have been taking that from a mistranslation.

False. Leviticus 18:22 says “‘You must not lie down with a male in the same way that you lie down with a woman. It is a detestable act."
Or check the King James Version: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
Or check the direct Hebrew to English text: "Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman; it is an abhorrence."

still probably mistranslated. the Hebrew could have been changed. I lie with who I want and you can't stop me.

No, I can’t. I can only hope for you to realize where you conflict with the Bible instead of justifying yourself and passing clear rules off as old or poorly translated.

I conflict with that part of the changed bible. The bible has been poorly translated that's just a fact. clear rules the bible is hundreds of years old its hardly relevant you can get good things out of it but its not rules it has rules but that's not a rule.

Ah, so there’s the source of the issue. You don’t believe the Bible is relevant anymore. Gotcha.

what you think that's a gotcha. its hundreds of years old it has good advice but its not a rule.

leviticus 18:22 is exactly the verse i'm talking about.

Are we reading the same one? It clearly says “men with men” and forbids sex between 2 people of the same gender. My only question is how is it physically possible to be as ignorant as you?

i'm reading a bible with the same mistranslation, yes.

things that are thousands of years old will be changed it was probably not about being gay in the past.

Yes, yes it was. To convince yourself otherwise in the pursuit of self justification is shameful.

ok then go back in time and read it. I accept that you think I am a sinner.

He's Jesus after all, What else did you expect?

go home old man

ur drunk

yuck