Isn't it curious how all the people our media decide to label as "dictators" are nevertheless extremely popular with their own populations, sometimes like in Gaddafi's case doing extraordinary things for people's collective health and living standards at the expense of the profits of multinational corporations?
And how strange how we randomly pick some "dictators" to go selflessly overthrowing in the name of "democracy," but not others?
And even stranger that the ones we pick *just happen to be sitting on top of enormously profitable exploitable natural resources like oil and fresh water aquifers?*
Bizarre, I know.