I See Dead People

Then you would be lying.

"In under six months, the more than 60 million unemployment claims filed during the coronavirus pandemic have far surpassed the 37 million during the 18-month Great Recession. The latest figure still exceeds the 665,000 filed during the Great Recession's worst week."
-https://www.businessinsider.com/us-weekly-jobless-claims-unemployment-insurance-coronavirus-labor-impact-layoffs-2020-9

"The latest popular vote total shows Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, with 63,649,978 votes to Trump's 61,943,670, according to the Cook Political Report. Third-party candidates, including Libertarian Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein, received just more than 7 million votes."
-https://www.al.com/news/2016/11/how_many_people_voted_for_dona.html

Yeah, I saw that after I posted it. Sorry, its just unbelievable that so few vote. I think we'll have 200,000,000 vote for Joe and 180,000,000 vote for Trump or thereabouts.

We'll see. Thanks for being cool about it.

Hint: that's more people than live in the US.

I figured you were rounding up the entirety of the population of the US . Failing that, I gave you the benefit of the doubt for not knowing the exact population. You would be over by 60mil, but I didn't care to pursue it. You drew the white flag saying sorry, so I didn't seek to correct you. Once more, Even though the US pop is 323m, there are only about 233m registered voters. Not everyone knows that and sometimes people say I come off as a know-it-all. Didn't wanna do that to ya.

I've got no problem with facts. I'm just predicting more people will vote than exist in the population or at least more people than registered voters.

You're not exactly saying it, but I'm assuming you're talking about voter fraud. How do you think voter fraud will be executed?

Like its being executed now: throwing away republican mail in votes, illegals being bussed to polling stations to vote multiple times, ballot harvesting where they ask you which party you are registered and if you say democrat they drive you to the polling station, partial percentage stealing on each machine using the stolen thumbdrives from that warehouse that was broken into (a pre teen hacked a voting machine in a contest). Basically the same thing they've been doing for years.

https://banned.video/watch?id=5f80dae6b48c16108a75954c

"Going over the news source headlines in the montage...
AP: California rejects over 100k voting ballots. The article goes on to read this: The most common problem, by far, in California was missing the deadline for the ballot to be mailed and arrive. To count in the election, ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received within three days afterward. Statewide, 70,330 ballots missed those marks.

Another 27,525 either didn’t have a signature, or the signature didn’t match the one on record for the voter

Breaking 911: Factual reporting? Rated very low.
Same story from NPR.org: There were only 9 military ballots. Four envelopes were empty Two were sealed. The rest were for Trump. In response Justin Levitt, a law professor said "It is the vital duty of government not to announce partial facts and 'potential issues' in pending investigations," Levitt said in an email interview. "Indeed, it's quite improper to announce the fact of an inquiry. And grotesquely improper to announce whom the ballots were cast for, as if that mattered in the investigation."

New York Post, Right-Center Bias, mixed factual reporting.
AP News states that the family didn't request the registration form, and were amused to receive it in the mail and promptly reported the issue. So, there wasn't any actual fraud there.

Zul Mirza was caught after 89 votes were fraudulent. Hardly enough to swing an election. Vigilance by law enforcement is working.

So before I go on and run out of space to reply, I'd like to leave this here:
California GOP are setting up fake ballot boxes, which is against the law. In spite of this, they are continuing to do so.

As for your montage, it's largely a collection of misleading headlines that try to make alarmist claims about relatively small issues that fit within the statistics of voter fraud which state that the threat is negligible (at best.)"

Where are you getting the ratings from?

Going over the news source headlines in the montage...
AP: California rejects over 100k voting ballots. The article goes on to read this: The most common problem, by far, in California was missing the deadline for the ballot to be mailed and arrive. To count in the election, ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received within three days afterward. Statewide, 70,330 ballots missed those marks.

Another 27,525 either didn’t have a signature, or the signature didn’t match the one on record for the voter

Breaking 911: Factual reporting? Rated very low.
Same story from NPR.org: There were only 9 military ballots. Four envelopes were empty Two were sealed. The rest were for Trump. In response Justin Levitt, a law professor said "It is the vital duty of government not to announce partial facts and 'potential issues' in pending investigations," Levitt said in an email interview. "Indeed, it's quite improper to announce the fact of an inquiry. And grotesquely improper to announce whom the ballots were cast for, as if that mattered in the investigation."

New York Post, Right-Center Bias, mixed factual reporting.
AP News states that the family didn't request the registration form, and were amused to receive it in the mail and promptly reported the issue. So, there wasn't any actual fraud there.

Zul Mirza was caught after 89 votes were fraudulent. Hardly enough to swing an election. Vigilance by law enforcement is working.

So before I go on and run out of space to reply, I'd like to leave this here:
California GOP are setting up fake ballot boxes, which is against the law. In spite of this, they are continuing to do so.

As for your montage, it's largely a collection of misleading headlines that try to make alarmist claims about relatively small issues that fit within the statistics of voter fraud which state that the threat is negligible (at best.)