ey Trumpies would really have a point with the Trump/Covid thing if it weren't for blatant hypocrisy every other day of the year

Bruh this guy just scrolled through 5 months of some guy's tweets just to find that one tweet.

░░▄███▄███▄
░░█████████
░░▒▀█████▀░
░░▒░░▀█▀
░░▒░░█░
░░▒░█
░░░█
░░█░░░░███████
░██░░░██▓▓███▓██▒
██░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓████
██░░██▓▓▓(◐)▓█▓█▓█
███▓▓▓█▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▓▓▓▓█
▀██▓▓█░██▓▓▓▓██▓▓▓▓▓█
░▀██▀░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█
░░░░▒░░░█▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓▓▓▓▓█
░░░░▒░░░█▓▓▓▓█▓█▓▓▓▓▓█
░▒░░▒░░░█▓▓▓█▓▓▓█▓▓▓▓█
░▒░░▒░░░█▓▓▓█░░░█▓▓▓█
░▒░░▒░░██▓██░░░██▓▓██
████████████████████████
█▄─▄███─▄▄─█▄─█─▄█▄─▄▄─█
██─██▀█─██─██─█─███─▄█▀█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▀▄▄▄▄▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▀

Ok, rules for debating

no using that "implied" bs, you could be making shit up and say it was "implied" in the comment

implication is a valid argument to use in a argument as much as your bs logical fallacys

I see... you're implying that you lost the argument... i see

you dont see anything, because you dont understand my logic or are purposely being BELLIGERENTLY IGNORANT

im not being aggressively ignorant; idk if u know what belligerent actually means (think u meant blissfully or something)

"you dont see anything, because you dont understand my logic "

"implication is a valid argument to use in a argument [sic]"

i like to sometimes stretch the definitions of words. aggressively ignorant is a great term to use in a argument.

you copy and pasted what i said again

"i like to sometimes stretch the definitions of words. aggressively ignorant is a great term to use in a argument."

only if u use urban dic cause i couldnt find othr defs on internet

i am using the official definition of belligerent i am simply stretching it to give my statements more depth and meaning, im trying to express how annoyed i am that you are ignoring what you have said in the past and what i have said, its like arguing with a child

i show you what you have previously said and instead of just denieing it YOU HAVE TO ADD logical fallacy to the mix which makes me even more annoyed

" im trying to express how annoyed i am that you are ignoring what you have said in the past and what i have said, its like arguing with a child"

u finally get the feeling i have this whole time ive been arguing with u

"i show you what you have previously said and instead of just denieing it YOU HAVE TO ADD logical fallacy to the mix which makes me even more annoyed"

what does this have to do with the def of belligerent

AMERICAN HERO

also theres a difference between an actual dictator and someone you disagree with politically you'll notice he didn't say its never ok to wish death he said to not wish death on someone for a political reason.

he didnt kill them its a virus, also those deaths have been greatly exaggerated

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/09/trump-coronavirus-deadly-downplayed-risk-410796

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/10/trumps-dubious-claim-that-hes-not-contagious/

That's partially America's fault for being to so fat. Who are at more risk and Europe as a whole has a population a little over double that of America yet has 5 times the amount of deaths? Plus the governors were in charge why don't you start blaming your governor?

Why are the governors in charge? you think a virus recognizes state lines? Remember those Ebola, Swine flu and mers plagues? No? why do think that is? We have 5 times the amount of deaths because the idiot in the WH was telling people not to wear a mask even after he knew how dangerous it is, we have 5 times the deaths because the idiot in the WH did not prepare with PPE and ventilators... we have 5 times the deaths because the idiot in the WH has people that actually believe a word out of his mouth.

The governors were in charge because the constitution says the president doesn't have the power. I said Europe has 5 times more deaths than America with only double to population. Dude ventilators make it worse it's only a last-ditch effort. We are the top producers of ventilators in the world.

He doesnt have the power huh, yes he most certainly does the power and the DUTY. again I ask, how did that Ebola and Swine flu work out? pretty well, and why do you think that is... again?

"That's partially America's fault for being to so fat. Who are at more risk and Europe as a whole has a population a little over double that of America yet has 5 times the amount of deaths? Plus the governors were in charge why don't you start blaming your governor?" as in fat do you mean the large population or the high obesity rate

no

It literally is.

flagging these comments for spam

The context

He never said the second part he only said that if someone disagrees with you politically you can't wish death on them whatsoever.

and i'm guessing he doesn't agree politically with the dictator kim jong un, so he's a hypocrite

What does that have to do with anything? W

hat he said was if you don't agree with someone politically you can't wish death on them, whether for a political reason or not.

"A dictator is a political leader who possesses absolute power. "

but if you want to argue technicalities, i wont stop u

what does trump have to do with this i dont even remembering mentioning him in this thread

what about soleimani tho

if u gonna say syrian airstrikes were the work of obama u gotta say that his death was the work of trump

bruh trump called a drone strike and killed him

"so? solamoni was a dictator obama just bombed kids lol"

moot point, solamoni still a person

" you saying killing a child and killing a dictator are the same in moral terms?"

straw man

point being soleimani is still a person; that counts as trump "purposely killing" someone

killing is killing

also what does this have to do with what we are talking about

also, it'd be great if you could provide sources where it says soleimani was a dictator

"implying"

technically not my argument

"dictator is a human"

well what are they, crabs?

1. if i can easily and logically draw something from your statement you have to understand that your argument is not complete

2.a dictator who has killed thousands might be a human but the problem i have is that you are acting like they are innocent and didnt deserve to die, we all are human doesn't mean that we all look or do the same things, thats like saying since all the people in jail are human and one human killed someone all of them should get life in prison

"this has to do with you saying trump killed a person purposely, which would have invalidated a previous argument i made about kim jon un"

bruh then why are you talking about obama's airstrikes

"huge diffrence between killing a child and dictator"

again, what does children have to do with this. did kim jong un kill children?

" if i can easily and logically draw something from your statement you have to understand that your argument is not complete"

it's a stretch, thats why people dont get arrested for "implying" to do something, not really hard evidence there

"a dictator who has killed thousands might be a human but the problem i have is that you are acting like they are innocent and didnt deserve to die, we all are human doesn't mean that we all look or do the same things, thats like saying since all the people in jail are human and one human killed someone all of them should get life in prison"

how am i acting like that?

"all the people in jail are human and one human killed someone all of them should get life in prison"

tf does this analogy have to do with anything

look, you are implying/acting like you are stupid right now.

1. im talking about obamas airstrikes because leftists act like he was the messiah so i just wanted to show he wasnt a angel

2. you keep saying hes a human and that trump purposely killed him if you keep saying human you arent addressing the fact he helped murder thousands of innocent people, so i wanted you to understand the flawed logic by saying a child is a human so is a dictator is there a diffrence?

3. what does the legal system have to do with anything, and in what situation could you get arrested for implying something? also you could have just answered the question instead of saying ItS A StrAw Man.

4. wdym how am i acting like that, you simply are. you said he was a human and trump purposely killed him, when you say human that doesn't discribe why he got killed and it absolves him of all crimes

5.its an analogy why your logic is severely flawed

im not sure what you mean, also Ad HoMiNem.

"https://apnews.com/article/5597ff0f046a67805cc233d5933a53ed
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/03/asia/soleimani-profile-intl-hnk/index.html
https://www.oregonlive.com/news/2020/01/who-was-qassem-soleimani-brutal-charismatic-iran-commander-who-led-international-network-of-assets.html"

1. only mention of dictator is about saddam hussien
2. no mention of word dictator
3. again, only mention of dictator is about saddam hussien

i guess its because hes a general without absolute power but hey i could be wrong

so if a person said this, they would be stupid?

u gotta provide me with a source i can actually access

bruh u need a subscription for wapo im porr

"he wasn't actually a dictator but he helped dictators kill thousands"

then why call him a dictator? clearly you haven't researched very well

Hating a murderous dictator for being a murderous dictator is pretty much the definition of a political reason.

We’re insisting on some intellectual consistency here

1. im talking about obamas airstrikes because leftists act like he was the messiah so i just wanted to show he wasnt a angel

yes, because obama has something to do with this convo

2. you keep saying hes a human and that trump purposely killed him if you keep saying human you arent addressing the fact he helped murder thousands of innocent people, so i wanted you to understand the flawed logic by saying a child is a human so is a dictator is there a diffrence?

pretty sure there is a fallacy for this but cant think of it off the top of my head

its something like this: if A is in B, and C is in B, that means A is C. this statement is false. Similarly, If soleimani is a Human, and children are humans, that does not make soleimani a child

3. what does the legal system have to do with anything, and in what situation could you get arrested for implying something? also you could have just answered the question instead of saying ItS A StrAw Man.

" legal system have to do with anything"

showing u how "implied" meaning cant stand as an argument, you could say you "implied" something, even if it wasnt implied in the first place

i'm not gonna answer any leading or loaded questions, just like timber1972

4. wdym how am i acting like that, you simply are. you said he was a human and trump purposely killed him, when you say human that doesn't discribe why he got killed and it absolves him of all crimes

bruh its a comparision of what u r doing to me so u get a taste of ur own awful debating techniques

"when you say human that doesn't discribe why he got killed and it absolves him of all crimes"

how

5.its an analogy why your logic is severely flawed

no, that is not my logic.

im not sure what you mean, also Ad HoMiNem.

not really ad hominem, just showing you how implying/acting something isnt necessarily true

1. not really tho

2. thats ur logic tho

3. same, but someone keeps rejecting it and it aint me

4. no its not go read the things i wrote

5. its not my logic if u change things about the logic

6.

a. even if it were im not trying to undermine ur argument
b. its name calling stupid

ok let me ask u some qs

a. Is Soleimani Human?

b. Did Trump order an airstrike to kill Soleimani?

c. Did Trump purposely order the death of a human?

1 and 2 arent even points its just stupidity
3 what logic have you presented? all you are doing is denieing everything i say like a little kid
4.i did and thats liget what you said oml this convo is dumb
5. i didnt change anything ABOUT THE LOGIC ITS YOUR STATEMENT
6. you are by saying im unintelligent therefore decreasing credibility and my argument
its still ad hominem

a. yes but only calling human absolves him of helping murder thousands
b. yes
c. yes but the human he called it on wasnt innocent by any stretch of the word

1-5 is just stupidity

"you are by saying im unintelligent therefore decreasing credibility and my argument
its still ad hominem"

it's unbased

see, Trump has ordered the deaths of humans

also, you gotta recognize people like hitler and stuff are still human

wdym unbased

yeah as a president he has ordered the killing OF HORRIBLE PEOPLE like the leader of isis.

hitler was obviously human but when you say human it doesn't detail what he did AGAIN if you say "human" you are absolving someone from anything and everything he or she has done because the word human is simply a clean slate definition of a person, i cant believe you are fumbling to understand, i know hes ordered killings of people but there is a large difference between killing someone innocent and then killing a isis leader or someone that aided in killing thousands

bruh chop_shop_lock

b like:

"the thing is trump hasnt purposely killed anyone "

and then b like: "yeah as a president he has ordered the killing OF HORRIBLE PEOPLE"

and then chop_shop_lock is like because they're horrible ppl they dont count as ppl but he forgot to clarify cause u should've said "trump hasnt purposely killed anyone horrible" instead

else thats kinda like the no true scotsman fallacy

" "human" you are absolving someone "

source would be greatly appreciated

and what does this have to do with anything again?

you know what? im honestly so tired of this bs

guess u lost the argument ok

i haven't lost, your stupidity simply has no bounds and this argument doesn't have any meaning anymore.

im so f**king tired of having to clear up things for you so im done hide behind your logical fallacys some more be a little more ignorant and maybe you'll win some more arguments

"im so f**king tired of having to clear up things for you"

yeah because u dont clear things up in the first place so u gotta do it

"hide behind your logical fallacys "

bruh im jst pointing out the mistakes in ur argument

adios trash

"i haven't lost, your stupidity simply has no bounds and this argument doesn't have any meaning anymore."

winner of the boldest claim without evidence post

you truely are a f**king retard

thats what ppl say when they dont have any evidence and lose the argument

WHAT EVIDENCE DO I NEED

ITS MY OPINION OF WHERE THE CONVERSATION HAS GONE IF YOU ARE F**KING ARGUING ABOUT ME WANTING TO LEAVE THEN IT TRUELY HAS GONE TO SHIT

u need facts to support ur opinion

TELL ME WHAT FACTS I COULD SUPPLY you know what im blocking you anyway

idk maybe what i said

please stop talking to me or im going to have to block you

adios trash

"i dont have a subscription doe"

i dont either thats why i cant access it

bruh it says i gotta give it one dollar

we just arguing whether 2+2 = 4 or not

like its not even a debate where people have different views its like we're debating facts

prob cause u havent used up ur free articles yet