Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989): The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.

Yes but burning buildings and being paid by Soros a foreigner is treason

1. No one's paid by Soros

2. Burning buildings is arson, not treason.

3. You're deflecting.

Also, I may have accidentally flagged your comment or the previous comment that I made. Sorry abt that.

1. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/george-soros-donates-220-million-radical-blm-groups-including-movement-end-policing-know/
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2020/06/09/minnesota-freedom-fund-faces-scrutiny-for-antifa-and-soros-ties-demands-defunding-of-police/

2. It depends on who pays you and the reasoning behind it.

3. I'm truth telling. I actually agree with the facts in your comment, but you were deflecting from the burning buildings rioting and killings that are going on.

1. Still no evidence that BLM protestors themselves are paid by Soros. It's just racial justice organizations being funded and there is still no evidence of Soros funding in the second article.

2. See above

3. The contention was that the content of the meme had nothing to do with burning buildings but burning flags, but I guess we agree that burning flags is completely legal.

Oh ok, because giving BLM and antifa money doesn't mean the protestors got the money. I guess they are useful idiots then right?

First of all, they weren't BLM and second of all, no protestor is getting paid to protest. They're doing it on their own.

If they weren't BLM what were they?

1. Here is your evidence that You-Know-Who funds the campaigns of DAs and influences the justice system by proxy. How many criminals has this DA failed to charge?4gykxe.jpg (click to show)