I see this was not featured, because the signature notice of the author is considered "spam". It shows that a) the concept of spam is unknown here (don't tell me what it is... I've been cleaning spam for years), and b) that the moderator in question has no respect for the author's original copyright, by considering his signature "spam". I normally do not speak out about how moderators should behave, but this is a clear case of taking the wrong road.
