I had already read this after I started hearing of the conspiracy theories on this subject. It's obvious you didn't read the full article you referenced. And it's also obvious you didn't read the article I referenced. You must be a "headline reader" as well as a believer and spreader of conspiracy theories. Here is the conclusion of your article: In order to evaluate and summarize the 6–100 GHz data in this review, we draw the following conclusions:
1. Regarding the health effects of MMW in the 6–100 GHz frequency range at power densities not exceeding the exposure guidelines the studies provide no clear evidence, due to contradictory information from the in vivo and in vitro investigations.
2. Regarding the possibility of “non-thermal” effects, the available studies provide no clear explanation of any mode of action of observed effects.
3. Regarding the quality of the presented studies, too few studies fulfill the minimal quality criteria to allow any further conclusions. (Translation: NOT PEER REVIEWED!)
BTW, in case you were not aware, the article I referenced came from "Peer Reviewed Studies." and of course yours did not....... nice try.