"I find it disingenuous that you ask me for evidence that Fat_Elvis is lying, but have no issue with his claims that Trump "talks shit", "can't delay the election", and that "herd immunity" is a solid plan."
So you think it's disingenuous to not challenge me on those things?
- He talks shit:
If you, as a snowflake won't even agree with that, then Trump truly should wish that everyone have a nice day, so that your overlords (Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, the whole cabal) will come out and tell people *not* to have a nice day.
- He can't delay the election:
That's just a fact. For you to *not* know that, only proves that you are way out of your depth in this conversation, and that your likely source of "facts" is the proven biased media, like MSDNC, because they don't seem to know it either.
- Herd immunity is a solid plan:
As the great Ronald Reagan might say about you, 'well, there you go again.' Once again, you try to quasi-quote what someone else said, in order to make your point, but you can't even get the quote right!
I never said herd immunity "is a solid plan", now did I? Look back at what I did say. Here it is for you, since you're clearly challenged: "or, at some point, enough will have it and recover, that we will have herd immunity.
That's what I said. Where in that, did I say that herd immunity is a solid plan? You read it that way, so maybe it's you that thinks it's a solid plan?
Or more likely, you've been pre-brainwashed to reject anything that your demagogues in the DIMocrat party claim isn't "following the science", even though they absolutely, positively, do not follow the science.
Time to educate you, out-of-your-depth-boy. There are two extremes govts have taken in dealing with the pandemic. Sweden, which pretty much did what I believe we should have done. Meaning apply some common sense social practices, and isolate the most vulnerable, and NOT kill the economy.
The other extreme is New Zealand, which just shut down its entire country (again) because of four new cases. And btw, as an island nation, it's way easier for them to that, than it would be for us.
Sweden seems fine now. (herd immunity?) These two approaches may end up having the same net result, but which one harms its country, its citizens, and its economy the most?