Trump holding bible

He looks miserable.

so who forced him??

Nobody, of course. I know you know you that, but it's typical snowflake logic to take a photo like this, and just tell us what he's thinking, as fact, as if we'll believe it just because we're told to (same as they believe what MSLSD and CNN tell them what to think!)

It's preposterous and arrogant for them,and for RRPatLaw in particular to pretend they actually know what's in the man's head or heart based on his expression, which pretty much looks like thousands of other photos of Trump.

So, what you're saying is "Objection - speculation." Respectfully, you'd be overruled in a court of law.
Please point out where I said anything about president* dipshit's mental state? The caption merely provides my interpretation of his outward appearance, e.g. facial expression and body language. Ironically (but not surprisingly), you're the one speculating. Thanks for playing :)

I'm not sure you thought your reply through very carefully. You stated: "The caption merely provides my interpretation of his outward appearance..." which is pretty clearly a case of you trying to claim you did one thing with your meme, when you clearly did something else.

Yes, you were absolutely getting to his state of mind. How else would you know that the expression on his face was due to anything?

I get it that memes are usually bereft of facts, so naturally what they state is entirely opinion-based. I just like to point out when someone is stating opinion as fact. You may be able to tell the difference, but there are a lot of really slow people here on the flip who can't.

This is a serious problem, imo, with people who believe what media tells them to believe, or form their opinions based on sound bites or even, gawd forbid, memes. Since they don't know the difference between a fact and an opinion, they believe the opinions presented as facts, for example on CNN, are actually facts.

Your meme is just a symptom of that pathetic situation, imo. (<<<--- see how I did that, with the imo!)

Okay, wow. So many fallacies, where to begin?

First, yes, I did think through my reply, but your strawman response leads me to believe you probably didn't. I stated an opinion based on my subjective interpretation of what is depicted in the image, but I did not attribute my opinion to the person in the image. Based on your response, apparently you did.

Second, your little diatribe about the media asserts your opinions as fact. Oh, the (again, not surprising) irony ...

So to sum up, your response is just an unfortunate symptom of the "my feels = reality" epidemic plaguing half of the U.S. these days imo (<<<--- see how I did that, [sic] with the imo!)

Thanks for playing.

Nobody, it was his bad idea of course.