Imgflip Logo Icon

Most would call it The Bible

Most would call it The Bible | I JUST HAD PEACEFUL PROTESTERS TEAR GASED; TO SHOW YOU THIS PROP | image tagged in donald trump,hypocrite,president trump,dumbass | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,655 views 2 upvotes Made by FunnyDog75 4 years ago in politics
22 Comments
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
It was smoke cannisters because tehy attacked cops, not tear gas. Don't be that dip-wad spreading lies.

https://nypost.com/2020/06/02/park-police-say-protesters-near-trump-speech-were-cleared-for-attacks-on-cops/
0 ups, 4y
Still think it was smoke bombs? Even the park admitted it was tear gas. Don't be that dipshit spreading lies. I would put a link, but it's so easy to find.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You're the f**kwad spreading lies. Even the church officials said it was tear gas, and no one attacked the cops. It was to break up the protesters so Bunker Don could walk across a park, hold up a prop in front of a church to look like a clueless man-child not hiding in the basement. It was a lame ass stunt, plain and simple. I bet his hand was burning. You might want to get your info elsewhere, the NY Post is as good for news as The National Enquirer.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
What amazes me about people like you is you'll believe some klown from the media, who wasn't even there, over the park police. Sure, they may have an agenda... gasp, but you refuse to recognie the media has an agenda as well.

Be honest now, dawg, no matter what Trump does, you're against it, right?

Simple fact; you don't know if it was smoke or gas.

You think you do, but you don't.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
No actually I do know it was tear gas. The church officials said and everyone there said it. The park police got smeared in the media for gasing a completely peaceful protest 15 minutes before curfew for his majesty to pull a ridiculous photo op. So they lied, I'm sure they were made to.

The agenda thing. A lot of talking heads on both sides have an agenda. But there is truth in facts, and just because a news organization said it I don't believe it. I believe in good journalism. And trust good journalists. Opinion pieces are just that, opinions.

Trump just does and says the dumbest f**kin things, over and over. It's embarrassing and dangerous. All he cares about are ratings and crowd size and being "perfect." He is never wrong, everyone makes excuses or lies when he does. Why does he always blame Obama?
2 ups, 4y
So a church official is now an expert on tear gas? Unbelievable...

The Park Police have said it was smoke, at least the last I checked, which has been a few hours. Maybe that's changed? If it hasn't, I'll take the word of the Park Police over a church official, and certainly over the clearly anti-Trump biased media, all day long. The Park Police cannot be forced to lie for Trump. It would not happen. They are bad asses who happen to have some integrity.

Your entire second paragraph is nothing but a word salad, imo. Please let me explain. I am not convinced you know the difference between when so called journalists express their opinion as fact, and actual fact. Nothing in that paragraph indicates why you believe these journalists have reported facts, other than saying you believe journalists report facts because you believe in good journalism. That's somewhat circular logic.

And there it is in the third paragraph. The TDS comes out in the open. Okay, enuff said.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
btw, FD75, now Mark Esper, the Secretary of Defense has also stated that the Park Police did not use tear gas, nor rubber bullets.

I know you'd rather believe Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell and the rest of the self-loathing, Trump-hating media instead, so I get why you actually "do know it was tear gas."
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I don't listen to any left or right leaning talking heads period. I never said you loved Hannity or Ingram or Tucker. Curious, where do you get your news? Do you believe church officials that it was used? Do you think Esper has an agenda?, because his story has changed a few times. Just curious about my questions, don't have a lot of time for back and forth.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I get my news from multiple sources. It seems to me that it takes a lot of effort to check out a story from multiple sources, take their biases into account, find anything in common between what they report, objectively view what each reports that the others don't, then sift through the lies, and then try to formulate an objective opinion. Plus, I have a few go-to sources that somewhat align with my thinking.

But even those have to be viewed with skepticism, because everyone in the media has an agenda. Sorry for not naming names, but I've found out the hard way that anything specific one admits here on the flip, will be used by idiots like Blue diaphragm and Vagabond douché to formulate lies in their pathetic attempts at personalizing their insults. You don't strike me as being like that, but at the time, neither did they. No offense intended with that observation.

Since you mentioned them, I can't take Hannity, and can barely tolerate Ingram. Carlson I find interesting. He's no republican / conservative lap dog, that's for sure. I enjoy his take on things, whether I agree with him or not. Which gets down to my view of the media as mainly entertainment. Informative entertainment, but still entertainment.

Esper's agenda apparently seems to be pissing off Trump, wouldn't you say?
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Wow, I completely agree and try to do the same. Sorry, not much time, I have to wake up early for work. As for Esper, yeah, he's pissing off Trump, probably get fired (resign). Why do reference his comments to defend no tear gas then?
0 ups, 4y
*Why do you*
0 ups, 4y
Actually he was just probably doing his bidding protecting the park police.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Well you can't go around indiscriminately attacking the country and the law and not expect the country to fight back. Eat you own dirt antifa dip-wad.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You're like a child wandering into an adult conversation you know nothing about you dicknut. I was talking about tear gas and peaceful protests. I'm not supporting the looters or violent rioters, they're f**kin criminals, they're the ones who deserve to get their asses gassed.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
That's just it moron. They weren't peaceful. Don't be that jerk wad.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"I'm against clearing out a peaceful protest for a photo op that treats the Word of God as a political prop," said Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., in a statement. While there is no right to riot or destroy property, he said, there is a "fundamental — a Constitutional — right to protest."

It just got violent, when they were removed with riot shields and tear gas for the Bunker Rat's photo op, dimwit.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Then you haven't been paying attention to how many cops and secret service men and women that had been hurt by your (cough cough) peaceful protesters. That in itself proves what an idiot you are.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Ok Deadhead, you win. I'm outta here.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
So long dip shit. You probably have some local businesses to loot and cops to shoot.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Bye, F**KNUT!
1 up, 4y
See ya antifa asswipe!
0 ups, 4y
I wish you weren't lying.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
I JUST HAD PEACEFUL PROTESTERS TEAR GASED; TO SHOW YOU THIS PROP