I get my news from multiple sources. It seems to me that it takes a lot of effort to check out a story from multiple sources, take their biases into account, find anything in common between what they report, objectively view what each reports that the others don't, then sift through the lies, and then try to formulate an objective opinion. Plus, I have a few go-to sources that somewhat align with my thinking.
But even those have to be viewed with skepticism, because everyone in the media has an agenda. Sorry for not naming names, but I've found out the hard way that anything specific one admits here on the flip, will be used by idiots like Blue diaphragm and Vagabond douché to formulate lies in their pathetic attempts at personalizing their insults. You don't strike me as being like that, but at the time, neither did they. No offense intended with that observation.
Since you mentioned them, I can't take Hannity, and can barely tolerate Ingram. Carlson I find interesting. He's no republican / conservative lap dog, that's for sure. I enjoy his take on things, whether I agree with him or not. Which gets down to my view of the media as mainly entertainment. Informative entertainment, but still entertainment.
Esper's agenda apparently seems to be pissing off Trump, wouldn't you say?