Quit indoctrinating children with the homosexual agenda. And the mods tried to censor this because it was "homophobic".

...you know you're allowed to not watch it, right?

It is a children's short film. Children should not be allowed to view inappropriate content.

You're not the judge of what's inappropriate for children. Freedom and liberty.

So it is okay letting a young child a violent film like A Clockwork Orange, The Exorcist, or The Human Centipede? After all, we are not the judge of what's inappropriate for children, are we? Freedom and liberty, right?

Equating gratuitous violence with a happy relationship is just ridiculous, surely you see that?
What the film will do is normalise same sex relationships so that heterosexual children are less likely to be abusive towards homosexual people.

It'll also make homosexual children feel like they are accepted and not alone.

Conversion 'therapy' is abuse.

Also, by your logic, all you should have to do to make homosexual people into heterosexual people is to show them a film with a heterosexual couple in it, which is almost all of them.
It's amazing that homosexual people exist when you think about it...

"What the film will do is normalise same sex relationships"

And how is that a good thing?

"It'll also make homosexual children feel like they are accepted and not alone."

If a child is homosexual, the moral thing to do is provide them with conversion therapy before their condition worsens, not to celebrate their mental health problem.

"Conversion 'therapy' is abuse."

Conversion therapy is not abuse. The real abuse is indoctrinating children with evil agendas, allowing adults to castrate their children, and celebrating mental health problems instead of curing them.

"Also, by your logic, all you should have to do to make homosexual people into heterosexual people is to show them a film with a heterosexual couple in it"

Not at all. What on earth made you come to that bizarre, twisted and false conclusion?

"It's amazing that homosexual people exist when you think about it"

Amazing in a bad way, yes.

are you homophobic? I dont wanna be supporting and upvoting all of your memes because right about now i feel like just downvoting all the memes that i originally agreed with and enjoyed

"homophobic" is such a cretinous newspeak word

It's from the 1960's. Homophobia is such a cowardly, shameful behavior.
It's pretty obvious that the real reason for it, the reason that homosexuality is criticised in the Bible, is because straight men know that on the whole they treat women badly and they're scared of other men doing the same to them.

Whatever you want to tell yourself.

"Homophobia" is a widely used term of dubious meaning. It is a coinage modelled on terms such as "claustrophobia" and "hydrophobia" but unlike those terms "homophobia" has no basis in clinical psychology. In response to the so-called "normalisation" of homosexuality, pro-homosexual activists attempted to stigmatise political opponents using a smear tactic to imply religious believers and others suffered from a "mental illness". The word caught on in academia, news media, and among Hollywood celebrities and is still used to imply discrimination against a person with a disability is perfectly legitimate and acceptable.

Nobody needed to normalise homosexuality, it's been around as long as we have and will be around for as long as we are; good luck with your battle.

is not about phobias, you are being intolerant and you don´t respect LGBT people just because they are LGBT. And where are your scientific proofs? XD

Homosexuality is also present in animals, i think you need to watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=243gqNzPYQg

Yes i has homophobic before, but i changed, you need to understand why homosexuals exists

He is although he might argue with the word homophobic.

what would you use?

I would say homophobic because that's what it is, they just don't like being called homophobic and get into semantics arguments about it.
They will argue that phobic means scared and they are not scared, although they clearly are. It's like when racists begin sentences with "I'm not racist but..."

People want to share their crappy, bigoted opinions but not be called out for it because they are more sensitive than the people they repeatedly accuse of being triggered.

he even says says that homosexuality is a mental disorder. smh

"Memingmemerthatmemes690 ups, <1h
wow, all the notifications i had were just 2 shit stains arguing..."

Haha! Welcome to Imgflip.

A site made for making memes quick.

That's how it originated. But the community turned to shit pretty quick

"That's how it originated. But the community turned to shit pretty quick"

That's one way to interpret people with opposing viewpoints having the opportunity to discuss them.

what i mean is theres people like jeffrey stone for example. but he doesnt really have to do with this

homosexuality isnt a mental disorder

Yes it is

lol if you think that you need help.

That doesn't sound very tolerant

"Conversion therapy is not abuse. The real abuse is indoctrinating children with evil agendas, allowing adults to castrate their children, and celebrating mental health problems instead of curing them."

Adults castrating their children? When? Where?

You presented that as a genuine issue so one skewed example from decades ago won't cut it (no pun intended).

A far more pressing issue is surely the systematic and unnecessary circumcision of newborn boys, literal genital mutilation happening everyday sometimes without parental consent.

shoebat.com/2018/11/29/texas-pediatrician-wants-her-son-chemically-castrated-and-turned-into-a-girl-and-she-is-trying-to-force-the-father-to-pay-for-it/

"Younger petitioned for full conservatorship that same month. Up until this point, he had been allowed to see his kids once a week for two hours and on the first, third, and fifth weekends of each month since 2017, though court testimony indicates he frequently skipped his visitation days. He also launched a social media campaign to “save” his child from the supposed harm of transitioning. For a child of Luna’s age, this is solely social and consists of keeping her hair long, choosing her own clothing, and using a feminine name and pronouns."

-Vox

You can hardly comment on the source considering yours...

It's purely social and at the request of the child, no castration, chemical or otherwise.

The child is too young to make so drastic a decision.

How is it drastic? Childhood is the ideal time to figure out who you are. I mean, that's partially what it's for.
If the child feels differently later on then their choices will reflect that, the Mother is not pushing anything, she is clearly supporting her child's understanding of themselves; that's what good parents do.

It sounds like the Dad is telling his child how to feel and label themself, how does anybody get to tell anybody else how they feel?

The Dad is rejecting the child's feelings.

The child's feelings are not causing anyone any harm.

"How is it drastic? Childhood is the ideal time to figure out who you are. I mean, that's partially what it's for."

Do children get to decide whether they want to reproduce?

"It sounds like the Dad is telling his child how to feel and label themself, how does anybody get to tell anybody else how they feel?"

Replace "Dad" with "Mother" and your comment would be correct.

https://archive.vn/gme3B#selection-563.0-563.105

What does reproduction have to do with it, the only changes during childhood are SOCIAL, that makes no difference to later potential reproduction.

"Do children get to decide whether they want to reproduce?"
No, children don´t decide their sexuality

"What does reproduction have to do with it, the only changes during childhood are SOCIAL, that makes no difference to later potential reproduction."

A sex change is reproduction-related is it not?

Nobody is suggesting that a child has a sex change and it is not an option.

The reality is nothing more than a child going by different pronouns, wearing different clothes and using a different name.

"The reality is nothing more than a child going by different pronouns, wearing different clothes and using a different name."

You forgot "castration".

I didn't forget it, it isn't happening.

"I didn't forget it, it isn't happening."

http://shoebat.com/2018/11/29/texas-pediatrician-wants-her-son-chemically-castrated-and-turned-into-a-girl-and-she-is-trying-to-force-the-father-to-pay-for-it/

It happens, but the problem is not the "gay agenda" and yes that they are not satisfied with the child´s gender

That website is extremely biased, they use clearly persuasive language to argue in favor of the Father, it is not an objective report.

Do you have something that corroborates what the article is saying?

Ok BOOMER

OK, have a think - *is* Disney releasing a children's version of A Clockwork Orange?

No. Why do you ask? What does this have to do with the topic at hand?

Exactly. What was the point of asking that?

Don't ask me. You were the one who randomly brought this up, not me. And if you knew there was no point in asking, why did you ask in the first place?

You're having memory loss of things you wrote two comments ago. See a doctor. There's probably no cure but you'll need assistance for basic things like going to the grocery store and remembering your children's names.

So it is okay letting a young child a violent film like A Clockwork Orange, The Exorcist, or The Human Centipede?

No child of any age should watch those films at all.

The problem is violence and gore, not homosexuality

The problem is violence, gore, nudity and the indoctrination of children with political agendas like the homosexual agenda.

I see that this post wasn´t a joke because of the comments you made

What is that supposed to mean?

you just don´t care about LBGT people´s existence

Incorrect.

THEN WHY YOU SAID THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS A DISEASE. AND THEN YOU SAY
" Incorrect." . I know i was homophobic before, but i have changed after a long research. You should research and understand

Incorrect.

Are you serious?

*cereal

??

lbgt? more like lettuce bacon g r o u n d b e e f and turkey.

XD You´re amazing

LGBT*

Why? Is there sex in it? Gratuitous violence? Homophobia?
In what way is it inappropriate?

There is evidently homosexuality in it. Did you not see the meme?

I haven't read up on the film, are you saying that there's a homosexual sex scene in it?

There is evidently a homosexual scene in it. Did you not see the image?

Ok, then continue with those ignorance in your head and i don´t have to agree with you tho,

but still i think abortion is murder

How am I the ignorant one here?

You´re denying scientific facts

How so?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=243gqNzPYQg

https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/johns-hopkins-psychiatrist-there-no-gay-gene

Ok, if you think that homosexuality is not natural, then just go for it, i dont have to agree with your weak arguments ,sorry if i offended you but DON´T BLACKMAIL ME FOR THIS! That´s it

There's also no heterosexual gene, what's your point?

Why do you think abortion is murder?

Abortion is murder because the fetus is a human being

How much do you know about abortion?

imagine if you´re a aborted fetus. See why abortion is not ok

"imagine if you´re a aborted fetus. See why abortion is not ok"

Ok, I'm a fetus. My brain has not developed yet so I can't think. Even if I could think I would have no concept of life or death.

You don´t have empathy

"You don´t have empathy"

Yes I do, that's why I don't think anyone should be forced to endure the physical and psychological trauma of pregnancy and childbirth if they either don't want a child.
What if there's a problem with the pregnancy and the fetus is harming the pregnant person or the pregnant person's body is harming the fetus or there are twins and one of them is harming the other?

if the fetus is harming the mother, abortion is ok in this case

"if the fetus is harming the mother, abortion is ok in this case"

What about the other instances?

You know abortion usually happens in the first few weeks before the fetus has developed and involves taking two pills?

"What about the other instances?"
In cases of rape, abortion is ok, but in other instances it´s not ok

oh boy, alex do be a lefist thoe

"What about the other instances?"

"In cases of rape, abortion is ok, but in other instances it´s not ok"

So it's about controlling the person who's pregnant?
Typically, men controlling the bodies of women.
According to you it's ok to 'murder' a baby if the pregnant person was raped? I guess you're not a Christian because there are multiple instances of rape being deemed acceptable in the Bible.
There are also instances where god basically arranges it.

I´m Christian and i hate rapists

Be greatful that you were not aborted

"I'm Christian and I hate rapists"

They must be dividing the spoils they took: there must be a damsel or two for each man, Spoils of dyed cloth as Sisera’s spoil, an ornate shawl or two for me in the spoil. (Judges 5:30 NAB)

When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl’s owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT)

Lo, a day shall come for the Lord when the spoils shall be divided in your midst. And I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem for battle: the city shall be taken, houses plundered, women ravished; half of the city shall go into exile, but the rest of the people shall not be removed from the city. (Zechariah 14:1-2 NAB)

“When you go out to war against your enemies and the LORD, your God, delivers them into your hand, so that you take captives, if you see a comely woman among the captives and become so enamored of her that you wish to have her as wife, you may take her home to your house. But before she may live there, she must shave her head and pare her nails and lay aside her captive’s garb. After she has mourned her father and mother for a full month, you may have relations with her, and you shall be her husband and she shall be your wife. However, if later on you lose your liking for her, you shall give her her freedom, if she wishes it; but you shall not sell her or enslave her, since she was married to you under compulsion.”

THEN WHY YOU DON´T COMPLAIN ABOUT ISLAM INSTEAD?

"THEN WHY YOU DON´T COMPLAIN ABOUT ISLAM INSTEAD?"

Where would the relevance be? What made you think of Islam in particular?
Are you talking about a particular passage in the Koran? Are you going to share it?

NO, IT´S BECAUSE ISLAM NORMALIZES RAPE AND HOMOPHOBIA AND YOU DON´T COMPLAIN ABOUT IT

"THEN WHY YOU DON´T COMPLAIN ABOUT ISLAM INSTEAD?"

Whataboutism. So it's ok that your god orders rape because something something Islam?

"NO, IT´S BECAUSE ISLAM NORMALIZES RAPE AND HOMOPHOBIA AND YOU DON´T COMPLAIN ABOUT IT"

So are you gonna share the passage in the Koran where it does that or just continue making unsubstantiated claims?..

I´m just pointing that in Islam countries, rape is normal while in christian countries it doesn´t

"Be greatful that you were not aborted"

I obviously wouldn't know if I had been. Why would I be grateful* for not being aborted. Why should a person specifically be grateful for that?
It makes more sense just to be generally grateful that you're alive.
I'm grateful I was raised by literate, atheists. I'm grateful that I have a really diverse group of intelligent, compassionate friends and as a result I am a critical thinker and not a bigot.

It's an odd thing to tell people what they should and shouldn't be grateful for.
Do you know how insignificant you are and how unlikely your birth was in the first place? You are one of billions of creatures crawling the planet not knowing how long you've got left. We all are.
We all have shared things and personal things to be grateful for, I do find that conservatives have a tendency to worry themselves over the personal choices of others rather than with themselves. It makes me wonder if they are actively avoiding introspection.

*grateful

my respose to this stupid text to end this argument

"My response to end this argument, I don't care!"

Bwhahaha yeah, you demonstrated that by continually coming back to it to write countless comments.
Got homework to finish, have you?
I get it, if your Mom's calling on you, what are you gonna do?

XD

"Do your parents know you support abortion?"

They know I support freedom of choice.
I'm not a fascist.

XD you are answering in the wrong order XD

im back

I did, it looks like they are hugging, not banging.
You can relax now. 🙂

How can a moral human relax when children are being indoctrinated with an evil agenda?

This is the real evil agenda, OK?

"Homophobia" is a cretinous newspeak word.

I see that you have such a lack of empathy. Stop denying reality. Islam countries hate LGBT people. And you hate Islam countries. Guess what? I think you are being hypocrite XD

It isn't newspeak at all, have you even read 1984? You don't sound like you know what you're talking about. In that context *you* are Big Brother, it is you who are trying to prevent people from having access to information and the freedom to express themselves.

It's such a typical conservative move to use the language of oppression against other people despite them being the oppressors.

What affect do you expect that 'indoctrination' to have on them?

https://www.conservapedia.com/Indoctrinate#Liberal_indoctrination

wow, all the notifications i had were just 2 shit stains arguing...

That doesn't really explain why you'd have a problem with it. Your link says that Liberals are making efforts to indoctrinate (the act of teaching a person to accept a belief uncritically) children. It says that they are promoting (to give publicity to so as to increase public awareness) homosexuality.
Being that homosexuality exists and has always existed, that lots of children are homosexual and/or grow up in households with homosexual parents and will continue to mix with homosexual people throughout life. What's the issue with them being taught that same-sex relationships exist?

In fact, children being taught about heterosexual relationships but not homosexual relationships means they are going to have an uniformed and skewed idea of society and is exactly how children learn homophobia. The reason that people are subject to homophobic abuse and violence and are sometimes killed is because children have been taught to be homophobic, it's a learned behavior.

"Atheists have focused considerable efforts on the public schools in order to indoctrinate young people into atheistic beliefs." -Conservapedia

I have a question, what are 'Atheist beliefs'? I'm an Atheist and I don't know what it's making reference to, maybe you can enlighten me?
Where is this standadized set of Atheist beliefs written?

It's curious that the word indoctrination is used in reference to Atheism.

Isn't teaching children to uncritically accept the teachings of the religion that you happen to believe in as fact even though countless belief systems are available and none of them can prove that they have any more truth than any other, indoctrination*?

*indoctrination
[ɪnˌdɒktrɪˈneɪʃ(ə)n]
NOUN
the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically.
"I would never subject children to religious indoctrination" ·

"That doesn't really explain why you'd have a problem with it"

Yes it does.

"Your link says that Liberals are making efforts to indoctrinate"

See? You just explained why I have a problem with it.

"lots of children are homosexual and/or grow up in households with homosexual parents"

And that is not a good thing. Homosexual children exist because of this indoctrination. Forcing young children to grow up in homosexual households is about the most harmful thing one can do to a child.

"What's the issue with them being taught that same-sex relationships exist?"

Because that is as damaging to a child. Just because something exists does not mean young children should be taught about it. Do you want to teach five year olds about adult topics, you sick perverted creep?!

How are types of relationships an adult topic? Why do you think it's ok to teach them about heterosexual relationships? Does that also make you a sick perverted creep? Why are you ok with indoctrinating children about heterosexuality? You just sound biased. That isn't good parenting.
I suppose it's your own personal religious bias that makes you think it's acceptable to tell children that they are going to burn in hell for eternity and that it's their fault someone died thousands of years ago, that's really sick behavior.
Ugh, it makes me think of those Christians who refuse medical treatment for their children who then become disabled or die because they thought prayer would help.

Religion is an excuse for people who want to justify making others suffer. Atheists don't refuse to get their kids medical attention because they think that there's something more effective.

"children being taught about heterosexual relationships but not homosexual relationships means they are going to have an uniformed and skewed idea of society and is exactly how children learn homophobia"

No. Teaching children about homosexuality will give them a skewed idea of society, and that is exactly how children become homosexual.

"The reason that people are subject to homophobic abuse and violence and are sometimes killed is because children have been taught to be homophobic"

No. The reason that children become homosexual is because they have been taught about it at a young age.

Nobody becomes homosexual.

How do you explain all the homosexual people who had both happy childhoods and no exposure to homosexual relationships?

"Nobody becomes homosexual."

How do you explain the existence of homosexuals?

"How do you explain all the homosexual people who had both happy childhoods and no exposure to homosexual relationships?"

All homosexuals developed their mental illness from some exposure to homosexuality.

"All homosexuals developed their mental illness from some exposure to homosexuality."

How do you explain people that had no exposure to homosexuality?

"How do you explain the existence of homosexuals?"

"Recently, scientists announced that they found some genes that might be associated with sexual orientation and a biological explanation for the reason gay men tend to have older brothers.
Probably the strongest current evidence is for genetic contributions—but that doesn't mean we've found a gene. All geneticists know that no complex human behaviors are determined by single genes. There was a lot of research in the '90s where people were hoping to find a genetic marker; that didn't go too well. The current evidence really focuses on twin studies, and these studies suggest that the heritability of sexual orientation ranges between 30 and 40 percent.

Heritability is not about a person; heritability is always about a population. So if we look at the population of Americans and all of their sexual orientations, the estimate of 30 to 40 percent means that amount of the person to person variation in sexual orientation is due to genetic factors. If sexual orientation was completely governed by genes, then heritability would be 100 percent. In other words, genetics raises the chances of you being gay, but it doesn't finish the job. There is clearly something non-genetic going on.

We've looked at a bunch of things, but we haven't been able to nail it down. There has been interest in the fraternal birth order effect, the fetal environment, the hormonal character of the placenta, the way levels of maternal stress may influence the fetal environment and may change the hormonal milieu, but there's been no reliable evidence. The one thing that we reliably know is that your family did not cause this. A lot of parents worry they may have influenced their child's sexual orientation, but we have been able to rule out that part of the environment. Everything else is up for grabs.

The heritability estimates tend to be higher for men than those for women, though we don't know why that's the case. It's possible that it's a very different phenomenon for men than it is for women with different causes, different developmental programs. Sexuality is something for which men and women are very, very different. Puberty occurs differently, the hormonal changes of puberty are different."

"How do you explain people that had no exposure to homosexuality?"

I already did. Try reading my comments for a change.

You explained nothing, you just repeated yourself.

"You explained nothing, you just repeated yourself."

Fine. I will explain again: there is no such thing as a homosexual that has not been exposed to homosexuality.

Hah. Who's gonna break the news to them that they don't exist, I'm not doing it. I bet you would.
Wait, how do you break news to people if they don't exist?

HAVE YOU SLEPT IN SCIENCE CLASS?

"Why do you think it's ok to teach them about heterosexual relationships?"

Because heterosexuality, unlike homosexuality, is natural. It has been scientifically proven that a stable household with one mother and one father present is best for a child.

"Why are you ok with indoctrinating children about heterosexuality?"

You cannot indoctrinate children with normal, natural things. Can you indoctrinate children with maths? You remind me of the characters from this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh3Yz3PiXZw

Also, I do not wish to hear about your sick and bizarre anti-Christian conspiracy theories. If you hate Christianity, then you hate love, forgiveness and morality. You are no better than satanists like Octavia_Melody. May God have mercy on your soul. Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved.

Homosexuality is natural, are you unfamiliar with the definition of natural?

Scientifically proven? Unbiased source? I could easily argue that men are more likely to be violent towards women that they are in a relationship with than women are towards women they are in a relationships with or men are towards men they are in a relationship with.

Children are more likely to be exposed to violence growing up with heterosexual parents.

I didn't say anything about an anti-Christian conspiracy, it's you trying to impose your ideology on me not the other way around. I think people should believe what they want, you are trying to force other people, including vulnerable children to accept everything you say as fact, that's indoctrination.

Do you genuinely believe that heterosexual children can become homosexual by watching a cartoon featuring a same sex couple?

A percentage of the population always has been homosexual and always will be homosexual.
What about gay animals?
Do you think gay animals have a gay agenda?

"Animals having a gay agenda is no less ridiculous than people having one."

You think that people having any agenda is ridiculous?

"Tormenting someone until they say they are not gay doesn't make someone not gay, it makes them repressed and at risk of mental health issues."

How is conversion therapy torment? And how does conversion therapy increase risk of mental health issues? It quite literally cures the mental health issue that is homosexuality.

"People pretending they are not gay because of peer pressure or the risk of losing family are still gay."

So everyone single person who was ever cured by conversion therapy was pretending?

"People are either born gay or they are not; that's how that works."

Nobody is born homosexual. And science is on my side here. According to scientific research, there is no "gay gene". Homosexuality is unnatural and formed by negative experiences.

And I am not the one "raging" here.

HOMOSEXUALITY ISNT A MENTAL DISORDER

where is this research from? EXTREMISM??

"Do you genuinely believe that heterosexual children can become homosexual by watching a cartoon featuring a same sex couple?"

Nothing is impossible.

"A percentage of the population always has been homosexual and always will be homosexual."

Hopefully that can be combatted using conversion therapy.

"What about gay animals?"

What about them?

"Do you think gay animals have a gay agenda?"

I want you to try reading over what you just typed. You think that it is worth asking whether animals are capable of having an agenda?

i can jump off a 400 foot building onto sharp razor blades, get cut, then fall another 50 feet into a pit of fire and survive? WeLl nOtHiNg iS iMpOsSiBlE

Animals having a gay agenda is no less ridiculous than people having one.

That was my point.

Tormenting someone until they say they are not gay doesn't make someone not gay, it makes them repressed and at risk of mental health issues.
People pretending they are not gay because of peer pressure or the risk of losing family are still gay.

People are either born gay or they are not; that's how that works.

The only person that that affects is the person they are having sex with.

The only thing that has changed in society is the level of acceptance and support, nothing else.

That's what you are raging against.