Because it didn't come from bat soup. It came from "science."

Because there are now about 8 billion people on the planet, encroaching on every inch of the planet, resulting in a much higher transmission rate of viruses from animals to humans.

Serious and honest question. Do you live in a metropolitan area?

One does not have to physically live in the Amazon to share in the collective responsibility for endless clear cutting of virgin rain forest for the cattle industry and the soy bean farms necessary to make grain to feed said cattle.

NO I can already guess your world is dead in 6 or 8 or 10 or 12 or 14 or 35 or 50 years. You have never seen the world beyond your urban, overpopulated, heavily industrialized little microcosm, and you naturally extrapolate that armpit out onto the rest of the planet. You've never seen the world so you don't realize it isn't overflowing with people, that it isn't dying, that a million species aren't dying and washing up on the shores and piling up in the forest. That trees and flowers are abundant, wildlife is thriving and the world is going on quite nicely no matter what you have been led to believe. Soybeans don't kill, clams produce methane, oil and gas are as natural as everything else on the planet and 50 parts per 1,000,000 of the atmosphere doesn't end the world. Climate change is based on arbitrary CO2 levels (plants can't live on less than 300 ppm thrive in 1500 ppm and 350 ppm is the planetary optimum?) as are temperature levels, there is no allowance in the models for natural variation and the assumption is a monolithic atmosphere- which does not exist. The models are based on a static model, random distribution and that is not the reality. The atmosphere/ climate is dynamic, fluid and when you factor precipitation, orographic weather and everything else that influences it you have well over a trillion data points- warming models barely break 1,000.
SO don't waste your breath, I've heard it a million times, shill for big oil, not a scientist, not peer reviewed, not science, when every real science disproves the hoax.
Live a partial life in fear of total destruction and waste the joy and peace and the comfort that is available in abundance, and of course demand socialism so the leaders can get filthy rich and the people can get abysmally poor to "fix" this problem caused by free markets.

I guess to summarize this, you don't know shit.

That's nice. Whatever all that bullshit you typed is, TLDR

Whatever Non-Amazon genius. I asked you a question to engage in a reasonable discussion and you come back with a dose of propaganda right out of the useful idiot playbook, so I spelled it out Mr. Party Pants of Science. How is the temperature of the earth unchanging except from the activities of mankind? No natural variation from year to year? Like I said, you have to deny every real science to buy the propaganda of socialist induced climate warming global change. Have the totally miserable, fear filled and hateful existence you've been indoctrinated for , then in 50 years think to yourself. "Well that never happened."

Whatever you need to tell yourself. There is no point in having a discussion with you, because according to you, 1) you already know everything there is to know about climate change (of course the experts have it all wrong) and 2) you already know everything there is to know about me (based on preconceived notions that allow you to immediately classify and discredit every human being different from you)...all of which tells me 3) you are not half as smart as you believe and a waste of my time.

Uh excuse me? Already know everything? That's why I asked a question in my first comment. 1) Experts in geology, biology, physics, entomology, chemistry, astronomy, meterology, and other sciences are experts, and they have it all wrong? 2) I don't know anything about you. You refused to answer an honest question to try to start to get to know you and your world view. You left me no choice but to respond to your inane comment about the Amazon, soybeans and cows, all subjects I do have extensive knowledge about. # Wasting your time does not involve significant cost.

Anyone who uses the phrase "socialist induced climate warming global change" has nothing legitimate to add to the discussion. Go play your game with the rubes, you can't sell your shit to me.

Ah, a closed mind. Not selling shit, you really don't give a rat's ass about the truth. If you did, you would google, optimum CO2 for plant growth. If the science really mattered, you would google hazardous levels of CO2 (OSHA or other health sites). If you cared about the truth, you would google a lot of other sites I would recommend for you to check out and draw your own conclusions.
You would ponder this example, let's say the atmosphere as a percentage is represented by the 100,000 seat Kyle Stadium in Texas (1/10th of a million, kind of scientific). Of those 100,000 sports fans, 79,000 are nitrogen. 20,000 are oxygen. 900 are argon. Let's do a simple tally to see where we are since those are really BIG numbers, that's 99,900 ( I'll wait while you get your calculator to make sure I'm not lying to you). Okay, checked me out? Good with that so far? The remaining gases are known as trace gases, of which 40 (400 ppm) is CO2. In the static atmosphere theory of Climate Change- 35 of those sports fans are good, but the 5 additional Texans are destroying the planet. 5 out of 100,000. 50 ppm.
Physics says that CO2 doesn't only reflect heat in one direction. If it reflects heat at all, it would reflect an equal amount of heat from the sun back into space- that's a real live scientific term called "equilibrium". Not as fun as the goosestepping march you are doing now, but hey, the facts can sometimes get in the way of a really good time.
Now let me present another case study. A few years back people were horrified by the amount of global warming induced glacial melting that revealed primordial forests underneath them. A sure sign we are racing headlong into catastrophe.
Don't you think to ask, "How warm was it when the forest grew 10,000 years ago before it got covered by a glacier?"

All the facts are TLDR. With that attitude you are doomed to ignorance.

LOL...go sell Televangelist Coronavirus Cures next...sorry man, I have had these arguments a million times with too many idiots to count...the scientists have this right, not you and Billy Bob from the comic book store. Peddle your product to the rubes, not me.

Educate me, please I'm serious. Explain the glacial melting that revealed primordial forests underneath them. How warm was it when the forest grew 10,000 years ago before it got covered by a glacier? You seem to be very well informed, I just can't square this with the Climate Change theory, and I think it's a key problem.

What happened? I asked you a question that you could help me with.

Ain't playing your game sparky. Go pedal your b.s. to the rubes.

Awe dude, is it because the science of climate change only takes 144 characters to explain and anything beyond that is too hard for you? Is real science beyond your mental scope? Is it you don't know why trees would have grown 10,000 years ago then been covered by a glacier. It's the robber land baron oil companies fault!!!!!
Oh I know. Your mammy told you that you can't be on the internet and you don't want to get caught again. She'll take away your favorite eco-organic-soy burgers and send them to starving cattle in the Amazon, again.
Don't pout, the short buses will be running again next school year.

Go peddle my bs? Dude, this is my meme. You came here puking out your Playstation wisdom. Stop smoking now, you won't have any Twinkies left for breakfast if smoke any more of that stuff.

I had a hard time sorting out your thoughts so I fed them into google translate and this is what it spit out-----

"One does not simply have to physically buy in Amazon to share in the collective responsibility for endless clear virgin cutting rain forest for the cattle industry and the soy bean farms necessary to make grain to feed" said the cattle.
"Anyone who uses the phrase "socialist induced climate warming global change" has nothing legitimate to add to the discussion. Go forth hence and ply your rubes of the cubic sort game, you can't sell your shit to me." he cast a menacing aspersion of his highest intellectual capacity.
"All the facts are TLDR. With that attitude I are doomed to ignorance," he pleaded within himself. "Anything longer than 144 characters is fraught with meanings and concepts too difficult for a man who has simply not gone to the Amazon to know!"
"LOL...go sell Televangelist, Coronavirus Cures next.!" esplained the wizurd.
"Sorry man, I have had these arguments a million times, and with too many idiots to count...the scientists have this right, to bare arms and to freedom of earth worship," he replied in sorrowful tones.
"Not you Billy Bob from the comic book store! Peddle your product to the rubic cubes, not me!" the wizurd begged.