Distracted Boyfriend

how is it a false dillemna if you cant get unemployment and you have to do it or starve?

Yes, In this case it is not applicable when literally the choice is "Either starve by having no benefits" or "Go back into the workforce and risk CV-19"

Just because you live with mommy and don't have to make it, doesn't mean it isn't the reality for many.

there aren't when you have no other means of support, you twerp. You live with mommy, so you don't have to live in the real world where unemployment is high and the option to get a job is very limited.

it takes TWO weeks to get the first paychek minimum, while that happens how do they even GET TO AND FROM work, our economy was so fragile most people can't afford to miss two paychecks.

Healthcare is tied to a job, so if you have a kid with diabetes, quitting your shitty job and waiting 90 days for healthcare in a new job is a death sentence.

You have no idea how the world works, wipe the snot from your nose.

yes, it litertally does and yes, having no insurance for 90 days will be a death sentence for many.

Insurance that can't pay for conditions that already exist means parents have to pay out of pocket 600 a month - normal countries pay about 35 a month for the same thing.

false, Canada pays 35 because they are the largest provider and negotiated it.

They don't artificially surpress it. Its the opposite. In America they charge 600 because they can. In normal countries they can't.

Stop defending big pharma charging 5000% increase and calling it a positive. You are f**king Americans.

those companies wouldn't sell it as a loss. They still sell it in places that have sane price caps. They charge that much because price gouging is real. They buy up all competition.

Yep, prevents price gouging. Big pharma still makes money. Children don't die for a 35 dollar bottle of insulin because they can get away with selling it for 600

turns out, whent he choice is "pay or your kid dies" it isn't a "free market" Situation - its coercion.