Well then by definition communism would be even better because it argues for immediate distribution and equality right? No. Because definitions, peoples interpretation of the definition and practical application are different things.
For example, avague definition like 'change for equality' means nothing in real life because even liberals can't agree on what equality is. Some want select groups to be a protected class and consider fair and equal criticism to be a form of discrimination and some want additional allowances/disadvantages retroactively instated on other groups because of historical instances..
I wouldn't call either of those positive change or equality but most liberals ive ever encountered would..