Need I say more!

Sitting Presidents cannot be criminally indicted per OLC guidance, and Trump has never testified under oath in relation to any scandal.

He never released his tax returns.

However, many of his associates have either already been bagged by Mueller, or else have the suggestion of criminality upon them through their later activities in Ukraine (Giuliani, etc.) even if they haven’t been formally prosecuted yet. (The endgame is these folks will likely all be pardoned by Trump in his last few weeks in office)

Trump dismissed Sondland and Vindman 2 days after his partisan impeachment acquittal, and took other actions to send a message that whistleblowing will not be tolerated.

Trump staffs compliant loyalists and family members in positions of power wherever possible.

Trump has pulled all the levers available to him to avoid accountability under the law.

Historians will be piecing together the wreckage of the Trump Administration for decades to come.

So you basically have nothing

So you're basically blind!

Braille baby! ;)

If you read all that and you still see nothing, I can’t help you.

He's beyond help! He's following Trump like a Satanist follows Satan!

That was a big word sandwich without any meat... not filling. What actual crime is he guilty of?

It's a fair question. Here's a simplified version:

1. The violations set forth and detailed in the Impeachment Articles: Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress. https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20191216/CRPT-116hrpt346.pdf
2. Obstruction of Justice in other respects: The retaliatory dismissals of Sondland and Vindman could have been impeachable conduct in and of themselves, save for the fact that they occurred 2 days after an impeachment acquittal and Democrats had the good sense not to put the country through that again.
3. Michael Cohen took the fall, but I believe the payoffs to pornstars during the '16 election unearthed by the Mueller team could have been linked back to Trump as a campaign finance violation.

That's just for starters, and for the other reasons I've detailed, there's very good reason to suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg.

You do realize this is all staged right? It's like basically watching wrestling while both parties are working together behind the scenes to extend the patriot act, continue wars, and back Israeli Zionist agendas and banks. Also this whole bailout is a huge fraud to strip citizens of their wealth and rights.
The impeachment was all bullshit from the start, they milked it as long as they could to tie up key democratic candidates so biden could steal the lead.
The virus was even planned in advance, event 201, there's even an tv special that aired a year ago pushing some new experimental vaccines. Oh and mandatory vaccines are coming next. You dont like government injections, that's fine but you won't be able to travel.
All this is happening while people like you are hyper focused on a bogus impeachment. They're two parties or two heads of the same snake, and you're on the menu for dinner.

I really hope you are trolling, because otherwise you are so far the conspiracy rabbit-hole that I don’t see any hope of you coming back.

I directly answered your fair question about what crimes Trump has committed, and rather than accept this information, now you are changing the subject and talking about a whole bunch of other stuff.

I’ve done the best I can.

https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20191216/CRPT-116hrpt346.pdf

Here’s 658 pages detailing what the House was able to learn about Trump’s Ukraine activities, despite the Administration’s holistic obstruction of the investigation.

Dissenting viewpoints included in the interests of fairness & balance.

If you want to see actual evidence of a real conspiracy, it’s all laid out for you right there.

658 pages is quite a read, I asked what his crime was and you have offered 658 pages, 658 pages, just to answer what should be a simple question. What if it was me offering you 658 pages of truth to impeach Obama when he was in office? Of course you're going to say you would have read it and made a fair decision and listened to my vague arguments but would you really? Think about it, what if the table was turned. Did you look into Obama's birth certificate allegations or did you trust that someone else had and debunked it? If you did look into it at all it was pretty easy to find the truth, not sifting through 658 pages either, his birth certificate had vector layers, which means it was made on a computer, computers didn't exist when he was born. Easy right? Impeachable offence right? The truth is simple and accessible, 658 pages is not simple or accessible. I was trying to expand your world view and maybe get you to take a step back and look at big picture stuff for a moment, but the journey is yours.

Oh so what computer operating system were hospitals using in 1961 lol

Yes, I looked into Obama’s birth certificate.

This article debunks several arguments made about the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate, including the vector layers thing: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/birth-certificate/

This was how Trump rose to political prominence: on the basis of a (frankly racist) rumor that turned out to be totally bunk. That foreshadowed a lot about him.

If 658 pages of Impeachment stuff is too much of a read, then here’s the condensed version (just the Articles of Impeachment themselves, which are 9 double-spaced pages): https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/democrats.judiciary.house.gov/files/documents/articles%20of%20impeachment.pdf

I’ve answered a couple more of your questions now — but I’m afraid you’ll find something else unsatisfactory in my response and will just shift the goalposts on me again.

I read the snopes argument, it doesn't debunk the vector layers, the layers have printing behind the typed words that appear when the typing is removed. It says there's some software floating around that can scan in layers but it doesn't say what software was used, why would they use some high tech scanner to scan a simple document, where is this magic scanner? The logical conclusion is that it was made on a computer, and not simply scanned from a real document. They messed up and released the certificate without making sure nobody would see the layers.
Snopes has a way of throwing some technical sounding words at a something they want to debunk without ever actually debunking anything. Like I said the truth is easy, snopes is hardly ever on the side of truth. Snopes is no more credible than me sitting on my couch, basically that's what it is, a middle aged couple on their couch surfing the internet.

Not trying to be the goal post here, but just like snopes, you want people to ignore the obvious and believe some elaborate story. Its simple, biden is on video admitting what he was doing in Ukraine, trump was investigating his corruption, Biden got caught, Pelosi was holding bidens opponents captive while he was able to run his campaign freely, if he could get into the frontrunner position then they could say trump was investigating his front running opponent and maybe biden could win. But biden is on video, we've all seen and heard about his corruption from his own mouth... it's easy. Trump may be a first class shithead but this right vs left circus isn't helping expose him.