Italy's wireless networks vs "coronavirus" cases

Looks like a population density map to me

Turns out, there's a conspiracy to put 4G coverage over highly populated areas.

I am shocked. SHOCKED! Well, not that shocked.

So, there's more cases where more people live?

It never hurts to go over the basics again, I guess.

Great point, Antithesis & Kylie Fan, thanks for the feedback. Yeah, I guess I would need to show another graph demonstrating that the concentrations are not merely due to population density. After all, one would expect that the most highly populated areas would also be the most likely areas to get wireless internet coverage. Oh well, back to the drawing board...
(This meme will self-destruct in 24 hours.)

The problem is that 5G has been installed only in densely populated areas (because that's the most practical, cost-effective way to do it), and the data I would need is not necessarily publicly available. Though such a study needs to be done, it would be a huge undertaking, the statistics would constantly be changing, and I'm not feeling up to the challenge, but I hope there are already people studying this. Of course, safety studies should have been long before governments let the telecom companies unleash such powerful electromagnetic waves on the public in the first place! 🤬

(Map on the right is dated March 9, 2020.)

What's really needed right now is an accurate mapping of where all the wireless networks have been introduced, along with a tally of how many "coronavirus" cases/deaths have been reported in each location, as I attempted to do with Italy.

I'm sure there is a very strong correlation. After all, more than 10,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies demonstrate harm to human health from RF radiation:
https://5g-emf.com/10000-studies/