Imgflip Logo Icon

Angry Greta

Angry Greta | WHEN SHE REALIZES THE TRUTH; SHE'LL FIND IT WAS HER OWN PARENTS THAT STOLE HER CHILDHOOD | image tagged in angry greta | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
10,127 views 99 upvotes Made by badmantn 4 years ago in politics
Angry Greta memeCaption this Meme
51 Comments
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
Bullshit Thomas | image tagged in bullshit thomas | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 4y
So I Got That Goin For Me Which Is Nice Meme | COUNTRY AFTER COUNTRY IS SHUTTING DOWN DUE TO CORONA, BUT GRETA WON'T BE TRAVELING UNTIL THIS IS OVER SO I GOT THAT GOING FOR ME, WHICH IS N | image tagged in memes,so i got that goin for me which is nice | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
They wont let her free think.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Summer's coming and no one can stop it.
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
It helps if you show a chart that goes back more than 140 years.
http://www.longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
So you think we should ban the use of cement?
1 up, 4y
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
But, wouldn't that cause deforestation? There'd be less trees to absorb the CO2.
Climate activists have their heads so far up their arses...
2 ups, 4y
Carbon is the building block of life. Carbon dioxide is not capable of trapping heat and therefore is not a greenhouse gas.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
A dead tree does not continue to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. It ceases to be a carbon filter (releasing oxygen) and becomes a carbon store.
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Fire-resistant wood? What did they use, asbestos? O_o
1 up, 4y
There are some families of wood that are as fire-resistant as concrete. Woods like ebony, ironwood, and ipe are fire resistant.....they're also expensive as hell. It would be cheaper to construct a building using human bone.
0 ups, 4y
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnn.com/style/amp/wooden-skyscrapers-timber-trend-catching-fire-duplicate-2/index.html

No asbestos, lol. This article goes into it a bit.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
Fire resistant upon completion. During construction it’s worse than a Texas A&M bonfire
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Is that the one that won’t be completed until the year 2041?
0 ups, 4y
https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/worlds-tallest-timber-framed-building-finally-opens-doors/amp

Here’s the current “plyscraper” record-holder in Norway, and it’s already been built
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
What could possibly go wrong.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Large pieces of wood don't burn easily, and the manufacturers do other stuff to the boards to make them fireproof

But don't take my word for it, just read the articles I posted or do your own research

Knowledge at your fingertips!
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Don't take my word for it, Read a history book. Watch a YouTube video, Ask Google,Siri or Alexa.

Knowledge at your fingertips! I know you'll ignore.
0 ups, 4y
Towers aren't really designed to withstand the full force of an airplane crash

Not sure what your point is this time
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I guess you missed that the climate swings were caused by volcanoes?
How on earth does cement, gas, oil, coal and land use fall under human CO2 emissions? We only emit CO2 when we breathe out. The plants breathe that in and give us O2.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I believe NASA knows more about planetary issues than all the right-wing TV/radio pundits and YouTube conspiracists put together

If they're capable of taking photos like this, then they're capable of measuring and describing changes right here on earth. And so are many other non-NASA affiliated scientists and agencies

"How on earth does cement, gas, oil, coal and land use fall under human CO2 emissions?"

Because these emissions are the result of human industrial processes. If our species didn't exist, concrete wouldn't be made and we wouldn't have coal-fired power plants. That's why lots of smart people are working hard on how to make these processes more eco-friendly

No one is saying we should breathe less. That's another source of CO2 I suppose but it's negligible
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
NASA takes our tax dollars and gives us crappy CGI, not photographs.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Damn, you are such a condescending prick. I told you not to assume. I guess you don't know the old saying about that...keep making an ass of yourself.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see...
1 up, 4y
Top panel: What you think you're doing
Bottom panel: What you're actually doing

Conspiracy theorists consider themselves "skeptics" but they are some of the least skeptical people of all. If Alex Jones or whoever shouts it loudly enough, then they'll believe it

A true outlook of skepticism requires you to check all new claims against what other authorities are saying, what you already know, and with common sense

When you do that: mainstream views don't look so bad
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
"I don't have to assume anything: you came right out and admitted it yourself when you said:

"NASA takes our tax dollars and gives us crappy CGI, not photographs."
If you really believe that, then yes, you are a conspiracy theorist.
I am sorry that label stings. It is not intended as an insult, just a description of reality."

This is what I was responding to when I said you are a condescending prick:

"Top panel: What you think you're doing
Bottom panel: What you're actually doing
Conspiracy theorists consider themselves "skeptics" but they are some of the least skeptical people of all. If Alex Jones or whoever shouts it loudly enough, then they'll believe it
A true outlook of skepticism requires you to check all new claims against what other authorities are saying, what you already know, and with common sense
When you do that: mainstream views don't look so bad"

You are still a condescending prick.
0 ups, 4y
I'll take being accused of being a condescending prick by a conspiracy theorist than to actually be a conspiracy theorist

Oh well

YMMV
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
In the past 150 years Volcanoes have created more CO2 than all of humanity will create throughout their entire Existence.

But don't take my word for it, Take the word of a credentialed Scientist.

"Over the past 250 years, humans have added just one part of CO2 in 10,000 to the atmosphere. One volcanic cough can do this a this in a day." (Ian Plimer)

Facts doesn't care about your hoax.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ian Pilmer lol, what a hack:
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Ian_Plimer
https://skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Ian_Plimer.htm

But don't take my word for it, check the studies cited in these unbiased sources

https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/volcano-co2-humans-emissions-16102017/

"While estimates for volcanic CO2 vary mostly between 200 and 300 million tons, our own CO2 emissions range around 24 billion tons — and that figure speaks for itself. No matter how you look at it, 2.4 gigatons are much more than 0.3."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/volcano-carbon-emissions/

"There is no question that very large volcanic eruptions can inject significant amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens vented approximately 10 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere in only 9 hours.
However, it currently takes humanity only 2.5 hours to put out the same amount. While large explosive eruptions like this are rare and only occur globally every 10 years or so, humanity’s emissions are ceaseless and increasing every year."

etc etc.

Facts don't care about your BS "source" or your narrative
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Oh I see. My credentialed Scientist is a hack, But your Scientists that receive grants in order to push the climate change hoax are legitimate. LMAO

No one believes your copied and pasted talking points, Your BS graphs or your links to biased sites. It's why your comments are consistently downvoted.

Now be the arrogant douche bag you are and say everyone is wrong. You're right because your parents raised you to be a gullible fool.
0 ups, 4y
You posted a single quote from a known biased scientist with no link or backing article... and another crying kid

And you label me arrogant lol

I actually do my research before commenting: you're going to have to work harder than that
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Nobody says the "world is ending" dude lol. It's just gonna get hotter and hotter, year after year, with unpredictable effects. Key distinction!

Already happened in Australia a couple months ago after its hottest and driest year ever. Remember that?

And right now we're only at 1 degree Celsius warmer than pre-industrial levels. What will happen at 3-4 degrees? We can make our best guesses, but nobody really knows until it happens.

But we do know that when it happens, y'all climate-change deniers will always have an alternative explanation no matter how ridiculous or implausible
2 ups, 4y
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
So... You're saying you're going to wait right here as Gretta grows old. Got it

Facts don't care about your feelings. Neither does Gretta, Kylie, Or your imaginary lazy ass wife.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Until Greta repudiates anything she's ever done, her climate advocacy stands

Facts don't care about your feelings
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
You're listening to a child, Stunted minds think alike.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
I give up looking for your comments buried in the downvotes. You don't need my help making an ass of you, You're doing fine on your own.

Keep posting those BS talking points, Copied and pasted arguments, And links to libtarded sites.
You are an arrogant fool, Other users on Flip agree. Your fake wife would agree if she existed.

Now be the arrogant fool you are ...And strut around like a pigeon thinking you're right and everyone else is wrong.

Don't crawl away mad, KylieClown, Just go away.
Angry Greta memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
WHEN SHE REALIZES THE TRUTH; SHE'LL FIND IT WAS HER OWN PARENTS THAT STOLE HER CHILDHOOD