I take it you did not see their response.
It only needed 2 hours to highlight all the ommisions of evidence presented in summation from Dems. They accomplished a solid rebuttal by presenting the testimony which the Dems collected from others present on the same occasion. Those ommisions clearly nullify all witness testimony presented in Dems Summation. The Dem case ommitted contrary opinions of the same phone calls etc. because they clearly state the opposing/nullifying information to the cherry picked information that Dems offerred.
I thought more information should be presented but I now see how The house should have collected all information and gone to the SC if it needed to compel witnesses who were unwilling.
So fix is in but no one to blame except themselves.